Side pipes and horsepower.
#41
Race Director
I have Allen's offroad sidepipes. You can hear me comin' a mile away, and if they rob a little HP, so what? They still sound badazz.
#42
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,859 Likes
on
1,102 Posts
This thread makes an interesting discussion, but until there's a controlled study of the same engine (of different HP ratings), utilizing different diameter, angle of bends, under body or side pipes, people r going to believe what they think will happen. There's just too much personal bias (conscious or unconscious) at work here.
#43
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: 6000' up in the mountains CA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
That's already been done, hundreds of times over the last 40+ years, and it's been well-documented; factory sidepipes are proven power-robbers compared to the standard under-car system, especially with big-blocks that pump a lot of air. The cross-section of the factory sidepipe inner core is 2.40 square inches, and the cross-section of the standard 2-1/2" under-car exhaust is 4.90 square inches; that's the only math you need to compare the flow restriction.
#44
Safety Car
Also depends on horsepower level you have to begin with. My 355hp ZZ4 crate motor did not seem to loose much at all with small 2" manifolds and factory style sidepipes - this setup includes a sleeve between the manifolds and the sidepipes that is less than 1 5/8" inner diameter!!! Yet the car ran 12.9 at 108 in the 1/4 at the track (2.03 60ft, which if on slicks/drag radials, might have been a 12.7) Point is, that calculates out to around 300hp at the wheels on most horsepower calc's with the 2,960lb weight. I would have thought that breathing out of a 1 5/8 hole on each side of the car would have killed alot more power than that!! That's no bigger than alot of primary tubes on SBC headers!!
I can tell you this, complete with documentation:
My 327, in it's previous, 2011 configuration, made more than 353 HP at the rear wheels with open headers.
With the cutouts capped, and running through the mufflers pictured in my previous post (VettePack 3 1/2 x 2 1/2 muffler/resonator), it made more than 348 RWHP..........a difference of only 5 RWHP!
Compare pulls 1 and 3 below:
Last edited by 65tripleblack; 11-18-2011 at 08:40 AM.
#45
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia Beach VA
Posts: 2,476
Received 574 Likes
on
321 Posts
C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified 2020
C2 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Joe, what happened on the 2nd or red pull. It was tracking better than the 1st and 3rd and just drops off at 5800. It looks like you had a problem and just let off the gas. I see it is in 4th where the other 2 are in 3rd. Strong numbers for a 327.
Mark
Mark
#46
Safety Car
I'm not smart enough to understand how torque multiplication and gearing has more than a little effect on how RWHP numbers are calculated and output by a chassis dyno. I can tell you that the axle ratio is 3.70.
Lab dyno numbers are independent of drivetrain config/gearing............................it is what it is.................. 1:1 at the flywheel, period!
Hopefully somebody who is familiar with the algorithm used on the Dynojet will educate all of us. I would think that chassis dynos are corrected for vehicle final drive ratio.
Joe
Last edited by 65tripleblack; 11-18-2011 at 09:38 AM.
#47
When I rebuilt for more power, I went to the pipes with a 2.5" inner, and man were they loud!!!! When I raced my buddy with a nitrous'd fast burn 385 in his '68 (who can't read his tach when he races) said he didn't know when to shift cause he couldn't hear his own motor, lol
Last edited by FastEddy; 11-18-2011 at 08:31 PM.
#49
Safety Car
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: St. Clair Shores MI
Posts: 4,050
Received 132 Likes
on
74 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
2017 C2 of the Year Finalist
I get that same complaint alot....... but I also get guys stopping by the pit to tell me that out of 150 musclecars... my little L79 sounds the best rolling down the track
#50
I put a set of Hooker Supercomp undercar headers on my '66bb, then had a custom exhaust fabricated to hook up to the factory 2.5" sidepipes with a balance tube at the 3" collector. It sounds great and I don't think it cost much hp. My 496 bb goes right to 6500 rpm without a hiccup. 2 1/8" primaries and 3" collectors. Good luck, tjs
#51
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Pineville Kentucky
Posts: 2,540
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
CI 6-8-9 Veteran
I guarantee you put the same person in the passsenger seat in two identical cars. (One with sidepipes and one without) and I GUARANTEE they will think the sidepipe car is WAAAAYYY faster
#52
Drifting
I never would have purchased a non-side pipe vette. If I waited 40+ yrs for one, I was going to ensure that it had what I wanted. Looks was the only consideration. Truly, I never even thought about the question of whether they added or subtracted power.
Well, that settles the matter...from one who knows....they hinder power..end of discussion...for those that like them, it's for the looks & sound, eh?....I also required that there was A/C in mine...sure it robs power, adds weight, etc, ...I'd be damned if I was gonna drive one w/o it......most of us r cruisers, we ain't racing the thing.
Well, that settles the matter...from one who knows....they hinder power..end of discussion...for those that like them, it's for the looks & sound, eh?....I also required that there was A/C in mine...sure it robs power, adds weight, etc, ...I'd be damned if I was gonna drive one w/o it......most of us r cruisers, we ain't racing the thing.
#53
Racer
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern Shore Maryland
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well said Farmer, if we are talking about index racing a car that dead hooks and a driver that shifts like Grumpy Jenkins then 15-30hp is a BIG deal. On the street a 4speed with street tires not so much of an issue. I have tried all kinds of sidepipes for sound only. I wouldn't trade my sidepipes for 150hp, I can't hook what I have. Sidepipes are way too cool.
#54
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,844 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
When I bought my '65 Corvette in 1972, I thought sidepipes would be a nice addition for several reasons. One of them was, the other mid-year Corvettes running around back then didn't have them. Metro area population of almost a million people and never saw a single sidepipe car except in the '65-'67 era. Shortly after that, they were all gone. Saw lot's of midyears but all undercar.
Anyway, I put them on and to this day, I think those sidepipes added a little throttle response to the engine and made it a little peppier. But, it's only a 250 hp engine. It wouldn't surprise me a bit that the sidepipes really choked the BB's but so did the undercar pipes. BB cars were not real hard to beat in a drag race with one of my SB cars, on the street back then while running through mufflers. Get the BB's on the track with open exhaust on both of them and it was a different story!
Today, it seems like EVERY midyear either has sidepipes or sidepipes are a planned addition. I still have the GM issue pipes and mine aren't loud like some report unless you open the the throttle but just cruising, makes a nice sound.
Anyway, I put them on and to this day, I think those sidepipes added a little throttle response to the engine and made it a little peppier. But, it's only a 250 hp engine. It wouldn't surprise me a bit that the sidepipes really choked the BB's but so did the undercar pipes. BB cars were not real hard to beat in a drag race with one of my SB cars, on the street back then while running through mufflers. Get the BB's on the track with open exhaust on both of them and it was a different story!
Today, it seems like EVERY midyear either has sidepipes or sidepipes are a planned addition. I still have the GM issue pipes and mine aren't loud like some report unless you open the the throttle but just cruising, makes a nice sound.
Last edited by MikeM; 11-21-2011 at 08:13 PM.