Fuel additives????





Tom Parsons
That's about how much benefit you get from additives...
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It costs about $16.00 per gallon, and is VERY corrosive to paint and hard on your skin. I put one gallon in every other fill up - whole tank the first time, half tank the second. Use rubber gloves and a funnel, pour s-l-o-w-l-y, and keep it off of your paint and skin.
This stuff works well for me, lets me run 12* static advance with no detonation, keeps the system clean, and makes up for the cr@p 91 octane 15% ethanol gas we get here in CA.
I'm sure the same old crowd of naysayers from other states and countries ( Indiana and Canada.....
) who have trashed my suggestion before will probably weigh in here again, so I'll have my flame suit on!
Who knows, maybe they still can get decent gasoline there and don't need it, but that doesn't mean it's not working well for me!

Many areas of Canada and the US have had E10 gas for decades and aside from mileage concerns on economy cars, nobody noticed any difference- or were simply unaware of what they were using. Now that there's stickers on pumps and E10 is in the news, there's a problem?
In any case my car runs better with the Touluene added, and I can't run 12* static advance without it on our 91 octane so called "premium", regardless of whether it's 10% or 15% ethanol.
Mike,
Scroll down on this link and it will show a picture of what they finally agreed to for a label. I'm sure that decision only cost 1 or 2 million dollars to reach. After all, you have to appoint a study group who intern appoints a committee and then everyone has to agree and then it's submitted for approval.
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/additive/e15/Jim

Many areas of Canada and the US have had E10 gas for decades and aside from mileage concerns on economy cars, nobody noticed any difference- or were simply unaware of what they were using. Now that there's stickers on pumps and E10 is in the news, there's a problem?
Scroll down on this link and it will show a picture of what they finally agreed to for a label. I'm sure that decision only cost 1 or 2 million dollars to reach. After all, you have to appoint a study group who intern appoints a committee and then everyone has to agree and then it's submitted for approval.
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/additive/e15/Jim
Scroll down on this link and it will show a picture of what they finally agreed to for a label. I'm sure that decision only cost 1 or 2 million dollars to reach. After all, you have to appoint a study group who intern appoints a committee and then everyone has to agree and then it's submitted for approval.
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/additive/e15/Jim
I can't tell from the exerpt in your post who Mike Ward's comment was directed towards since he's been on my "ignore" list for a few months now, but I assume it was probably me since he seems to love to take a shot whenever he gets the chance. I make a practice of not responding or "engaging" in anything he attempts to stir up.
So - thanks for responding on my behalf and saving me the trouble, even if it did come at the expense of having to read what I assume was one of his comments!

Glenn
This is just one example of portable test kits you can buy to check fuel for alcohol and water content.
http://www.fuel-testers.com/product_gas_alcohol.html











You can waste your money on snake oil additives if it makes you feel better. It won't hurt, but it doesn't help either



