Can Am aluminum blocks
#22
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
I don't know, Jim - I hadn't heard of that one. I do remember clearly that all '73 Chevrolets got the coolant recovery system (which was an absolute necessity on the Vega), and it went into production with full knowlege that it infringed on the existing patent; that's how important it was. The coolant recovery system and the larger radiator solved the chronic cooling problem (which was the root cause of the engine problem). I remember all that stuff like it was yesterday - I was the Vega Launch Manager at Lordstown.
#24
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
The engine design problem was Ed Cole's insistence on an iron ("Heron" head, with intake and exhaust valves in-line and intake and exhaust ports on the same side of the head) head on an aluminum open-deck block (Chevrolet didn't design the engine - Corporate Engineering Staff did, under Cole's direct supervision, and punted it to Chevrolet before any durability development was done). Chevrolet HATED that engine - we called it "The world's tallest, smallest engine".
The first thing Chevrolet did after having the engine dumped on them was to design a SOHC crossflow Hemi aluminum head, which was 26# lighter, made 40 more horsepower, and had the same coefficient of expansion as the block; it was called the "L-10", and 12 were made (see photo below). Ed Cole (then President of GM) refused to approve the funds to produce it, as "You already have a cylinder head" (the iron one, which he designed). Had the L-10 head gone to production, there wouldn't have been any "Vega engine stories".
#25
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes
on
3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
I don't know, Jim - I hadn't heard of that one. I do remember clearly that all '73 Chevrolets got the coolant recovery system (which was an absolute necessity on the Vega), and it went into production with full knowlege that it infringed on the existing patent; that's how important it was.
This plea went out in the Feb/Mar 1975 issue of Corvette News. Does that fit the timeline of the lawsuit and/or was the listed GM contact an attorney?
Expiring minds want to know....
Jim
#27
i sold several set of iron plated pistons to carl foltz many years ago. he was collecting all that old can am stuff. his son runs a cylinder head shop in mich. someplace. i have the instuction manual on how to set up those can am engines on my computer.
#28
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
The suit was filed in the Fall of '72, right after the 73's were announced, and was settled about six months later.
#29
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
#30
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,529 Likes
on
3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
I was told by someone long forgotten now that the reason for the request in Corvette News was that GM owned the patent on the idea of a coolant recovery system and needed some examples to prove that GM was the first to reduce the idea to practice.
Now I don't know what to make of the CN request.
Jim