What rear ratio do you like?
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
What rear ratio do you like?
I want more highway drivability for my 58 with 4:11. It runs about 3200-3400rpm at 60mph.
I am looking to buy a 3:55.
-Anyone have an opinion as to the best all around driving ratio?
Thanks
(I'm trying to get in touch with a forum member now to buy. It's hard to find one! Chicago Corvette has great deals but I was told to stay away.)
I am looking to buy a 3:55.
-Anyone have an opinion as to the best all around driving ratio?
Thanks
(I'm trying to get in touch with a forum member now to buy. It's hard to find one! Chicago Corvette has great deals but I was told to stay away.)
#4
Le Mans Master
This subject has been talked about a lot before. I had a 3.55 and as far as highway driving, it still did not give me a low enough RPM. Put a 3.08 in and am very pleased now. You will get lot's of different replies and it comes down to personal preference. I also tried a 3.36 before the 3.55. Wide ratio for sure! Pilot Dan
#6
Le Mans Master
i'm not so sure there is a simple "one answer" to your question. A lot will depend on the gear ratios you have in your tranny and the HP/TQ of your motor.
For example, on my '65 I have 4.11 rear gears which do make a pretty lousy highway gear BUT my stock L76 365hp motor with the 30-30 cam is notorious for it's lack of low-end torque so the 4.11 is practically a requirement just to get the thing off the line.
On the other hand, if your motor produces more torque than you could go with a higher (lower number numerically) rear gear making highway driving a lot more pleasant.
If you have the torque and tranny gear ratios to make it work, a 3.08 or 3.36 would make a great highway gear.
If you dropped in a 5-speed tranny you might even be able to go to a 2.73 rear.
For example, on my '65 I have 4.11 rear gears which do make a pretty lousy highway gear BUT my stock L76 365hp motor with the 30-30 cam is notorious for it's lack of low-end torque so the 4.11 is practically a requirement just to get the thing off the line.
On the other hand, if your motor produces more torque than you could go with a higher (lower number numerically) rear gear making highway driving a lot more pleasant.
If you have the torque and tranny gear ratios to make it work, a 3.08 or 3.36 would make a great highway gear.
If you dropped in a 5-speed tranny you might even be able to go to a 2.73 rear.
#7
Race Director
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes
on
621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
Barry
one would have to have a 'torque monster' big block for an engine to pull a 2.73 w/OD. with my .73 OD and a 2.73 rer, it would be effectively a 1.99; it wouldn't even come close to the ZZ4's curve except maybe about 100...
Bill
#8
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
I think a 327/365 with even a 3.08 axle and no OD would be a sorry combination at anything less than a dollar's worth on the highway. And that's illegal almost everywhere!
#9
Team Owner
My 3.70 wasn't awful to start with but the addition of the Tremec 5 spd just made it perfect....a 'deeper' 1st gear and effortless highway cruising in OD 5th gear. Perfect.
#10
Race Director
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes
on
621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
From reading posts here on this forum about OD transmissions, I think this particular fact is often overlooked.
I think a 327/365 with even a 3.08 axle and no OD would be a sorry combination at anything less than a dollar's worth on the highway. And that's illegal almost everywhere!
I think a 327/365 with even a 3.08 axle and no OD would be a sorry combination at anything less than a dollar's worth on the highway. And that's illegal almost everywhere!
i still think the 1st gear ratio x the rearend ratio rule of thumb should be 10 or above for decent driveability.
the ZZ4 seems to be happy as it has a low flat torque curve.....
Bill
#11
Racer
my 350/370 LT1 (a kissin cousin to the 327/365) was only tolerable with a wide ratio muncie and a 3.55rer til i installed the MY6 with a 3.09 1st gear and then it became driveable. when i changed to a 3.36 it was back to just tolerable and if it hadn't been for the 3.09 1st it would have been a BIG mistake...... thank God for FI; with a carb it would have been next to impossible.....
i still think the 1st gear ratio x the rearend ratio rule of thumb should be 10 or above for decent driveability.
the ZZ4 seems to be happy as it has a low flat torque curve.....
Bill
i still think the 1st gear ratio x the rearend ratio rule of thumb should be 10 or above for decent driveability.
the ZZ4 seems to be happy as it has a low flat torque curve.....
Bill
#12
Le Mans Master
I don't remember now without looking at my info on the car when I get back home but I THOUGHT the standard rear gear ratios were 2.73 standard and 3.08 as a higher performance gear but I very well may be wrong and am forgetting the real info in which case I apologize for the incorrect info.
Generally I agree with you that a 2.73 is going to be pretty high gearing and going to be tough getting off the line but for highway cruising it sure would give a nice low rpm. Maybe with a 5 or 6 speed it could be usable??
In the OP's case a 3.08 or 3.36 is going to be better but I still say it depends on his motor and tranny combo
#13
Drifting
I think there needs to be a couple questions answered first.
What I might like isn't necessarily what you might like or be looking for.
RK
What I might like isn't necessarily what you might like or be looking for.
- What motor / hp ?
- What type of driving (highway / street)?
- What average speeds ?
- Burnouts / Cruising ?
- Tranny (Wide / Close)?
- Tranny (4spd / 5 spd)?
- Is gas mileage a concern ?
RK
Last edited by RoadKing96; 02-08-2012 at 05:31 PM.
#14
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
The SHP engines of the '50's/'60's did not like to run with high gearing, whether it be off the line or cruising. That's why in most cases the standard gear was 3.70.
When you run those engines getting at least close to the point of max torque (3000-3500 rpm), they have good throttle response and acceleration plus acceptable fuel milage. If you try and choke them down to a lower rpm, they do none of the former very well at all.
If you have a standard 250/300 hp engine, they'll accept the higher gears a lot better.
Last edited by MikeM; 02-08-2012 at 05:40 PM.
#15
Drifting
This subject has been talked about a lot before. I had a 3.55 and as far as highway driving, it still did not give me a low enough RPM. Put a 3.08 in and am very pleased now. You will get lot's of different replies and it comes down to personal preference. I also tried a 3.36 before the 3.55. Wide ratio for sure! Pilot Dan
Last edited by tach drive 61; 02-08-2012 at 06:38 PM.
#16
Le Mans Master
Barry,
The SHP engines of the '50's/'60's did not like to run with high gearing, whether it be off the line or cruising. That's why in most cases the standard gear was 3.70.
When you run those engines getting at least close to the point of max torque (3000-3500 rpm), they have good throttle response and acceleration plus acceptable fuel milage. If you try and choke them down to a lower rpm, they do none of the former very well at all.
If you have a standard 250/300 hp engine, they'll accept the higher gears a lot better.
The SHP engines of the '50's/'60's did not like to run with high gearing, whether it be off the line or cruising. That's why in most cases the standard gear was 3.70.
When you run those engines getting at least close to the point of max torque (3000-3500 rpm), they have good throttle response and acceleration plus acceptable fuel milage. If you try and choke them down to a lower rpm, they do none of the former very well at all.
If you have a standard 250/300 hp engine, they'll accept the higher gears a lot better.
back in the day, you would order at least a 3:70 with a close box and the smart guys bought the 4:11's
you are right about the sweet spot in around 3000 rpm and most did not care about freeway cruising....
then again, you use a wide box behind those heavy cammed engines and really change the driver comfort with a taller gear
the problem was the rpm drop in 4th and ironically, the taller you went with the gear, the more it dropped the torque below the sweet spot on the 3rd to 4th shift....unless of course you wound it tighter in 3rd....
#17
Burning Brakes
I love 3:70's with a close ratio - perfect for the type of street driving that I do
#19
Safety Car
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Clinton Township MI
Posts: 4,750
Received 119 Likes
on
98 Posts
Cruise-In III Veteran
Really like the "jump" with my wide box and 3.73:1 posi rear. DON'T like buzzin' when I try to cruise on long trips above 65 mph. Frankie's right about getting that perfect match via a 5 speed using my 3.73's. I'm slowly getting off the fence to migrating in this direction.
Jim
In God We Trust!
Jim
In God We Trust!
#20
Race Director
Another vote for the 3.70 ratio.