283 Question?
I'm working on a 1960 Apache 1/2 ton Pick up truck that has the original 283ci engine. I would like to rebuild my motor to be strong & efficient. I think Chevy did that with the Corvette in those years. Reliable, probably able to run on regular fuel of today and plenty of horses to pull without guzzling the gas. Can you please tell me how to convert my 283 to be the same as the Corvette 283 w/270 hp? And also correct me if I'm wrong? I'm trying to keep my truck period correct so I don't want to add things onto the exterior of the engine that weren't available or would be noticed.
Thank you,
Michael
I'm working on a 1960 Apache 1/2 ton Pick up truck that has the original 283ci engine. I would like to rebuild my motor to be strong & efficient. I think Chevy did that with the Corvette in those years. Reliable, probably able to run on regular fuel of today and plenty of horses to pull without guzzling the gas. Can you please tell me how to convert my 283 to be the same as the Corvette 283 w/270 hp? And also correct me if I'm wrong? I'm trying to keep my truck period correct so I don't want to add things onto the exterior of the engine that weren't available or would be noticed.
Thank you,
Michael
Scribing the bore into the head deck with Dykem then relieving the chamber to the scribe around the intake valve will help flow tremendously....the heads are where the power is found.
I like to shim the stock valve covers and run full roller lifters....they are worth the expense...Comp has a budget roller lifter now that is durable....Trend pushrods are a big plus here too.
You cannot see the cam....so if your budget allows....run a hydraulic roller...Comp's XR258HR would be perfect....
You will have to measure compression....but try to get above 9.5 to 1.
Intake wise....the dual quad is really the best choice....it will flow the best out of any of the period intakes of the time.....but know that ANY modern aftermarket intake will out flow it even with a single carb.
An Edelbrock performer looks pretty stock when painted engine color.
They make an EPS intake now that even has the oil filler tube hole in it.
A 600 cfm vacuum secondary carb is probably the best choice....although I am ver partial to Holleys 670 Truck Avenger with the billet primary boosters....these work great with a small V-8.
I recommend headers of course.
A MSD billet distributor can be painted at the base and have the old style cap installed for stealth effect....the MSD is easy to curve and you will pick up here.
An easy 300+ horsepower is available here....it will move the truck around smartly.
I recently built a small bore 305 for a 54 Chevy truck with all of these mods and it runs very strong
while knocking down 19 MPG!
Peace,
Jebby
If you don't mind a slight deviation from original appearance, find a 400 SB and stick it in your truck.
.
Last edited by MikeM; Jan 18, 2013 at 08:00 AM.





http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c1-a...-pictures.html
and I think that they sound ok too:
crankshft/rod bearings
Camshaft/lifters
pistons
heads
intake manifold/carburetors
distributor
air cleaner(s)
and a few other miscellaneous parts.
Since the manifold, carburetors, distributor weren't factory installed or period correct for a truck, not to mention the carb/manifold combination is expensive and not suited for truck use, see my previous post.
If you're gonna' use your truck for a truck, the 270 hp engine is not the way to go. More cubes are at a lot cheaper price.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I want to use my truck as a daily driver and add a little pep to it without filling it up every other day. Also to have the ability to occasionally tow a trailer or help a friend move. An efficient running motor that burns as much fuel as possible and breathes freely I believe will accomplish this. When I found out the Corvette of the same year as my truck has essentially the same starting blocks of my engine I wanted to see what mods could be made that are period correct and achieve my goals.
The more ideas and the more brands with the correct data of what to use is really great, so that I may weigh through it and figure out which combo of info is best suited for my project.
Jebby,
Thanks for the write up!
Blu72,
Thanks for the link. I'll definitely watch your build a few times!
Thank you again,
Michael










