C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

327/350 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2014, 09:28 PM
  #21  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hockystik
One more thing to add. I usually “baby” my cars. I like to enjoy the power but hate to brake things that dig deep into my pocket. So, while I’d enjoy stepping on the gas, I won’t be racing it. Does my easy driving change anyone’s opinion on the 350 hp?
I don't race my car either (original motor, trans and rear end, btw) HOWEVER, every now and then I will run it through the gears close to 200-300 under red lining it, and an occasional rolling burn out. What the hell, IMO it's not much fun having a sports car unless you "run it through it's paces" so to speak from time to time. It's what they were meant to be used for in the first place.
Old 10-17-2014, 10:20 PM
  #22  
ricks327
Race Director
 
ricks327's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Birmingham Mi
Posts: 12,580
Received 1,613 Likes on 901 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Donny Brass
mine will run just fine on 93...... with a little timing pulled out.
Donny,
Yours runs more than "just fine".
Rick
Old 10-18-2014, 03:20 AM
  #23  
skyjerm
5th Gear
 
skyjerm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default A 327 is a 327

I researched this online (so it must be true : any 327 is basically a 327 with different cams, carb, intake, etc. Meaning, the difference between an L-79 and an L-2x or 3x is what it puts in and not what it puts out.
I'm not inclined to agree with that based on pure physics, but I can find no facts to dispute it.

Anyway, to your point (what gas to put in it), the most popular guidance is to put the cheapest octane that won't knock. For me (327/350hp), that's full premium (91-93 octane, depending) gas in California, although I had some luck with Super (89 octane) when I was feeling more experimental. If I lived near a drag strip, I'd put in 105 octane and try not to blow my heads off. Seriously, too much octane is not a good thing.

Last edited by skyjerm; 10-18-2014 at 02:50 PM.
Old 10-20-2014, 11:00 AM
  #24  
hockystik
Navigator
Thread Starter
 
hockystik's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hockystik
I've been looking for a nice mid year driver. I found a 1966 with a 327/350 hp. A friend told me those had 11: 1 compression ratio and won't run on pump gas. Is this true and what do these run on and if the last owner ran on pump gas, what kind of damage could this have done? Am I better off finding a 327/300?
Thanks for any help.
Thanks again for everyones response. Not an issue anymore. Over the weekend, I found basically the same car, but with the 327/300 and loaded with options. I bought that car. Only drawback is that it’s an automatic, but I can deal with not shifting a nice car. Now that I own one, I’m sure I’ll have more questions in the future.
Mark
Old 10-20-2014, 11:10 AM
  #25  
BB767
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BB767's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Philo IL
Posts: 847
Received 354 Likes on 148 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hockystik
Thanks again for everyones response. Not an issue anymore. Over the weekend, I found basically the same car, but with the 327/300 and loaded with options. I bought that car. Only drawback is that it’s an automatic, but I can deal with not shifting a nice car. Now that I own one, I’m sure I’ll have more questions in the future.
Mark
Congratulations Mark. While the 327/300 doesn't have the halo around it like the L-79 does, I'm sure you'll find in real world street use it will be an easy engine to live with, especially if you've got a power glide.
Now post pictures of your new car please!!

Thomas
Old 10-20-2014, 12:18 PM
  #26  
Gary's '66
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Gary's '66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2012
Location: Wilton Ca.
Posts: 3,115
Received 192 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hockystik
Thanks again for everyones response. Not an issue anymore. Over the weekend, I found basically the same car, but with the 327/300 and loaded with options. I bought that car. Only drawback is that it’s an automatic, but I can deal with not shifting a nice car. Now that I own one, I’m sure I’ll have more questions in the future.
Mark
Congrats Mark, it sounds more like the car for you going by the way you described your driving habits. Good luck and POST PICS ASAP!
Old 02-01-2015, 01:29 PM
  #27  
Basicman
Heel & Toe
 
Basicman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 327/350

Originally Posted by hockystik
I’m listening to you guys. I’m feeling better about the 350 now. Anymore input welcome. Thanks to those that have responded.
OK, I can give you the real skinny from my own experience. I have a 65 327/350 that is still a factory sealed engine. I have had this car since 1975. I use it and I mean use it. Great Lake tours, weekend get aways exceeding 1000 miles,Smokey mountain tours, everyday use and just all around useful car. Still has points. I run midgrade. When I first had to run unleaded back in the 70's, it spark knocked, but as the years went by and the old carbon residue cleaned up, it started to run just fine on unleaded and I have the original heads without hardened valve seats. Also, spark plug life improved significantly, probably by a factor of 3 since I still have the same plugs that I installed over 30,000 miles ago and they look fine. Great engine.
Old 02-02-2015, 11:00 AM
  #28  
ditchdigger650
Racer
 
ditchdigger650's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Half Moon Bay CA
Posts: 470
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I bought my L-79 in April of 1991 and have run 91 octane in it since day one, never had a problem. I've had several 327's through the years and this to me is the best running small block engine GM ever produced.
Old 02-02-2015, 01:47 PM
  #29  
Basicman
Heel & Toe
 
Basicman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Unleaded fuel in older cars

Originally Posted by ditchdigger650
I bought my L-79 in April of 1991 and have run 91 octane in it since day one, never had a problem. I've had several 327's through the years and this to me is the best running small block engine GM ever produced.
I posted a thread recently on hardened valve seats and the fact that I was working in the auto industry back in the late 60's and early 70's. One of my first projects when I joined Chrysler was to run a bunch of tests using unleaded fuel. Bottom line was we could sink valves on the engine dynomometer but rarely on road tested vehicles. We ran severe cycles to assure we were OK. Also, if the engine saw any leaded fuel and I mean a small amount like the factory fill, the valve seat life was significantly increased by multiples. So, all 327 engines saw leaded fuel, therefore, unless you regrind the valve seats, they should last a long time.
Old 02-02-2015, 01:57 PM
  #30  
morly1963
Melting Slicks
 
morly1963's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: EHT NJ
Posts: 2,724
Received 631 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

I had a high HP engine in my 1970 Vette a few years back and put a can of "Octane Boost" in every fill-up. After getting tired of that I just ran the gas with-out the booster and couldn't feel a difference.
The engine was fine.
Old 02-02-2015, 02:14 PM
  #31  
Basicman
Heel & Toe
 
Basicman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Octane Boost

Originally Posted by morly1963
I had a high HP engine in my 1970 Vette a few years back and put a can of "Octane Boost" in every fill-up. After getting tired of that I just ran the gas with-out the booster and couldn't feel a difference.
The engine was fine.
My experience and I have 40 years in the auto industry and a lot of it in fuels and lubes is that those octane boosters and upper valve lubrication products don't do much if anything. If one can get a gallon of aviation gas with real TEL, then that will do more than anything for the valves. Very little required. A little TEL goes a long ways and I suspect you don't even need that. When we ran the tests, we measured valve stem heights every 3000 miles and that is how we determined ef the valves were sinking into the seats, but we never saw an engine failure as I recall. The industry went to induction hardened valve seats mostly because of heavy duty operation like trucks and heavy trailer tow. In summary, I never saw a disabling engine failure due to running unleaded fuel in vehicles with non hardened valve seats. Hope this helps.
Old 02-02-2015, 02:28 PM
  #32  
ricks327
Race Director
 
ricks327's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Birmingham Mi
Posts: 12,580
Received 1,613 Likes on 901 Posts

Default

Basicman,
Did you work the dyno at the Auburn Hills, Mi. location?
Rick
Old 02-02-2015, 05:13 PM
  #33  
emdoller
Melting Slicks
 
emdoller's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: El Dorado Hills CA
Posts: 2,793
Received 479 Likes on 336 Posts

Default

Mine too runs fine on 91 octane.

As far as 350HP vs 300HP, I don't want to get into the benefit of 50 extra HP but I will say that there's nothing like the distinct sound of an L79. I have both motors and will take the L79 in a NY second.
Old 02-02-2015, 05:44 PM
  #34  
65 vette dude
Melting Slicks
 
65 vette dude's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: cooper city florida
Posts: 3,461
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I have a bone stock 65 L79, and I have my total timing at 34º. I run 93 octane, and I have never had any detonation.
Old 02-02-2015, 11:41 PM
  #35  
jimgessner
Safety Car
 
jimgessner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Bandera Texas
Posts: 4,148
Received 638 Likes on 382 Posts

Default

Bought a 65 CHENILLE SS L-79 new. Owned three L-79 Corvettes over the years. My 66 convertible had air conditioning. These were the best running Chevrolet cars I ever owned, and I had over 100 Chevrolet cars in my life. I love Rochester fuel injection and solid lifters.....and the old 327/300hp engines. But L-79 were the best bang for the $$$. In 1965 where could you find this much fun for $107.60?
Old 09-23-2017, 07:16 AM
  #36  
Jeffthunbird
Melting Slicks
 
Jeffthunbird's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Cortez, FL
Posts: 2,710
Received 892 Likes on 439 Posts

Default Confirm I Have a L-79...

I'm resurrecting this old thread. I bought a '67 coupe with matching number engine and I'm told it is the 350 HP. It has a sticker saying this on the air cleaner lid but I don't think those were factory. How can I confirm which small HP rating I have?
Thanks
Attached Images   
Old 09-23-2017, 07:28 AM
  #37  
Easy Rhino
Team Owner

 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Coloring within the lines
Posts: 27,355
Received 1,920 Likes on 1,333 Posts

Default

Look at the engine stamping on the passenger side of the block surface just forward of the head.

If the engine is original, it should have two alphanumeric codes. The one on the left will be a partial VIN and should match the last six of your car's VIN.

The one on the left should start with the letter "F" and be followed with a date code and a two letter suffix. That suffix tells what the engine is.

On the surface of it your engine appears that it could possibly be original, valve cover paint excepted.

You appear to have the 461 aluminum intake manifold, so if original it is either the L79 (350 HP hydraulic lifters) or L76 (365 HP solid lifters).

Correction: Reading is fundamental - yours is a '67, it cannot have the L76, so it almost sure to be the L79, a very well-thought of 327 engine.

Post the codes here and I'll break out the "Lime book" and interpret.

Last edited by Easy Rhino; 09-23-2017 at 07:30 AM.

Get notified of new replies

To 327/350 hp

Old 09-23-2017, 07:30 AM
  #38  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

On the front of the block at the PS head there should be a pad with a number on it...the letter suffix at the end should tell the engine type IF it hasn't been altered (which does happen unfortunately)...
Attached Images  
Old 09-23-2017, 07:34 AM
  #39  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,016
Received 6,946 Likes on 4,785 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

There's is no need to have this thread come back to life. Just make a new one.

Butto answer your question yes 67 cars used a air cleaner decal showing cubic inch and horsepower rating. But it's a poor way of determing what your engine is. As they have been selling them for years cheap. What you can look for is the engine stamp pad. That is located on the passinger side of the block on the front. If you look down at the end of the valve cover you will find it. If it's covered in paint DO NOT sand the paint of. Use lacquer thinner and remove. Then take a good close up picture. From the looks of the intake you have a L79 327/350
Old 09-23-2017, 07:49 AM
  #40  
Jeffthunbird
Melting Slicks
 
Jeffthunbird's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Cortez, FL
Posts: 2,710
Received 892 Likes on 439 Posts

Default

Thanks a lot for the info. The number matches the VIN which I knew but it also displays the HT which is the L-79 4-speed which is correct.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: 327/350 hp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.