When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi all,
I have a 1964 327 engine,10.5/1 compression, 300 BHP originallly and manual 4-speed . I am going to recondition the engine and being European and not used to the USA cam figures was wondering what sort of cam was mounted originally and what best cam to use now for normal,maybe a bit spirited driving?
Thks for answering,
Dirk/Antwerp
Hi all,
I have a 1964 327 engine,10.5/1 compression, 300 BHP originallly and manual 4-speed . I am going to recondition the engine and being European and not used to the USA cam figures was wondering what sort of cam was mounted originally and what best cam to use now for normal,maybe a bit spirited driving?
Thks for answering,
Dirk/Antwerp
The stock replacement for the 327/300 HP cam is Sealed Power CS-274.
SWC Duke recommends his "300 HP Special" cam.
The stock replacement for the 327/350 HP cam is Sealed Power CS-179R which will be "fine" with your compression ratio although it was always used with nominal 11:1 SCR.
Any of these have gentle valve action and are used with the stock GM valve springs.
Last edited by 65tripleblack; Feb 12, 2017 at 09:49 AM.
The actual CR of typical OE 327/300s is no more than 10:1 and they should run detonation-free on European 98 RON fuel. They might even be okay with the next lower octane. You should run a test. CR specs back in the day were as over rated as horsepower.
Installing the 350 HP cam in a 327/300 has been common for decades, but it will change the idle behavior and be a dead giveaway that the engine has been modified.
If you want to maintain OE idle behavior with the stump pulling low end torque of the 300 HP engine and the top end power and revs of the 350 HP engine you can do a "Special 300 HP" config. with the McCagh Special camshaft.
Search for threads started by me and download the "Tale of Two Camshafts" pdf. You should also check out some the the other threads in that list like the compression ratio paper and tuning seminar.
Regardless of which path you follow replace the OE connecting rods. Your engine has the first design 327 rods that are weak at the bolt seats and subject to fatigue failure.
The large bearing base 350 rods are a lot more durable than the first design 327 rods and even the second design 327 rods that went into production in '66. (Both are small bearing.)
Plain vanilla 350 rods are okay for reuse unless the maximum design speed is over 6000.
I would stay with the stock 300hp camshaft, rebuild the engine in Stock form and enjoy your car. The 300hp engine has plenty of performance for today's driving.
I agree with Mike.
The 327/350 HP cam is the way to go.
Engine sounds great and with a LSA of 114 it creates a excellent vacuum signal.
But I admit is miss the solid lifter noise.
Hi all,
I have a 1964 327 engine,10.5/1 compression, 300 BHP originallly and manual 4-speed . I am going to recondition the engine and being European and not used to the USA cam figures was wondering what sort of cam was mounted originally and what best cam to use now for normal,maybe a bit spirited driving?
Thks for answering,
Dirk/Antwerp
I'm not going to dazzle you with theories and papers representing 50 year old thought processes, but I do know of one tried and true spec that will get you what you want. First things first, do NOT use any cam that has the same lobe profile on both the intake and exhaust. Second, do NOT use a cam with an exhaust lobe that has less than 10 degrees (more) duration than the intake lobe. Example 200 intake, 210 exhaust; 210 intake, 220 exhaust, etc.
Once you get to about 220-222 on the intake side, you've reached the point whereby you start losing enough vacuum at idle for power brakes (if you have them). Lobe separation angle plays a big part in cam selection.
Do yourself a favor and use Crane H-278-2 (grind number) 113801 (part number)
Invest in some reduced stem manley valves and this cam with those valves are worth probably 30HP over the other cams above. Valve springs and some scat rods will make the motor live forever.
Disclosure, I have used this cam profile multiple times for the use you're looking for and I used to build performance engines. The track was my dyno.
Last edited by ArchStanton; Feb 13, 2017 at 03:33 PM.
The large bearing base 350 rods are a lot more durable than the first design 327 rods and even the second design 327 rods that went into production in '66. (Both are small bearing.)
Plain vanilla 350 rods are okay for reuse unless the maximum design speed is over 6000.
Duke
Duke - do you have a part number for those large bearing base 350 connecting rods? As luck would have it, I am helping a friend take his 250 hp 327 up to the 300 hp configuration, so we have some license to improve sight unseen things like the cam (this thread valuable there) and we will take the opportunity to address the connecting rods.
Duke - do you have a part number for those large bearing base 350 connecting rods? As luck would have it, I am helping a friend take his 250 hp 327 up to the 300 hp configuration, so we have some license to improve sight unseen things like the cam (this thread valuable there) and we will take the opportunity to address the connecting rods.
The 350 rod big end is too big for a 327 unless you're using the '68/later crank which also requires larger main bearings.
Duke - do you have a part number for those large bearing base 350 connecting rods? As luck would have it, I am helping a friend take his 250 hp 327 up to the 300 hp configuration, so we have some license to improve sight unseen things like the cam (this thread valuable there) and we will take the opportunity to address the connecting rods.
I think you can use Eagle I beam rods P/N 5140. They weigh in at 590 grams which is not as heavy as someother after market rods. They are 5.7 inches and use a 3/8 cap screw. Also Crower Sportsman rods are good but a little pricey. Both are close to the OEM rod weight.
Eagle SIR5700... available in both small and large bearing,... pressed or floating pin... about 570 grams (very close to OE)... about $250 per set... okay to 7000-plus on a 327.
Email me if you want the "Special 300 HP" tech support paper.
Hi all,
I have a 1964 327 engine,10.5/1 compression, 300 BHP originallly and manual 4-speed . I am going to recondition the engine and being European and not used to the USA cam figures was wondering what sort of cam was mounted originally and what best cam to use now for normal,maybe a bit spirited driving?
Thks for answering,
Dirk/Antwerp
Comp cam 12-677-4
274 int duration 280 exh duration exh 510 lift int 501 lift
lobe separation 110. This is a solid lifter cam.
Lobe separation at 110 will allow compression of 10.5 to 1 not to denonate. Also 650 Holley double pumper is a good choice.
Hi all,
Thanks again for all the advice given. Got me a new set of H-beam rods ,thinking about Sealed power H660 Hypereutectic pistons.
Engine has an Edelbrock torker manifold.In view with the car not going to be driven when cold,do I plug the carb heater orifices in the alu manifold?Seems the engine gets lots of heated air from under the bonnet.Some years now since I have seen decent snow here in Belgium.
I have not decided yet on cams,want to follow advice from the senior members,but as I notice the H660 flat pistons give only 9.5 C/R. Do I have to take dome ones?
I read that it makes the combustian chamber less favourable .
Dirk/Antwerp
The H660 is okay. Also google keith Black pistons and look at the KB156 and KB157. The actual CR depends highly on head gasket thickness and piston vendor often don't say what head gasket thickness is used to determine the specified CR. Search threads started by me and download and read the CR paper.
Once you have selected a cam, the maximum CR can be established base on IVC point, and then you use the data you measure and piston dome specs with various head gasket thickness to get the CR in the proper range without exceeding the maximum
H-beam rods doesn't mean much unless you state the manufacturer and part number. There are many out there. How much did they cost?
A single plane manifold is not a good choice for road a road engine. They sacrifice low end torque for some top end power, but how much time will you spend over 5000 revs?
Any OE big port manifold or aftermarket 180 degree manifold that will provide adequate hood clearance is fine.