C2 front end seems a little high?
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
C2 front end seems a little high?
Is there a measurement I can take to see if my '65 SB is riding too high in front?
If it's too high, how do I raise the front or lower the rear? Thx, Sully
If it's too high, how do I raise the front or lower the rear? Thx, Sully
#2
Race Director
Yes, do you happen to have an AIM or GM shop manual for the car? Measuring instructions and tolerances are provided in them. Also, many previous threads on the subject with a search.
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-29-2018)
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Jul 2001
Location: Various places in California. Not currently aflame.
Posts: 20,510
Received 634 Likes
on
392 Posts
The AIM includes ride height numbers, I believe. I don't have mine with me, but I'm sure someone here will post the page.
You could also take measurements from the bottom lip of the fender to the floor and perhaps some of us could give you our corresponding numbers.
But, in my view, it's personal preference. I think my car rides a little too low in front. I plan to raise it. The only proper way I know to raise or lower the front end on these cars is by changing or cutting the springs.
With all that, your car's stance looks very nice to me.
You could also take measurements from the bottom lip of the fender to the floor and perhaps some of us could give you our corresponding numbers.
But, in my view, it's personal preference. I think my car rides a little too low in front. I plan to raise it. The only proper way I know to raise or lower the front end on these cars is by changing or cutting the springs.
With all that, your car's stance looks very nice to me.
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-29-2018)
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-29-2018)
#6
Le Mans Master
In the Vehicle Information Kit from the GM Heritage Center for the '66 Corvette (the '65 dimensions were not as legible) it lists the Exterior Dimensions on page 44. Rocker Panel to the ground, front and rear are listed as 8", not a bad place to start. It also lists other dimensions, but some are in reference to the Body Zero line. I'm not sure where the body zero line is and I couldn't find anything that did identify it.
Page 16 in the '65 Vehicle Information Kit.
Good luck... GUSTO
Page 16 in the '65 Vehicle Information Kit.
Good luck... GUSTO
Last edited by GUSTO14; 03-29-2018 at 03:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-30-2018)
#7
Melting Slicks
Here are the '65 AIM pages showing height measurements. The "Z" and "D" heights measure the suspension height independent of tire size.
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-30-2018)
The following users liked this post:
Sullyvette (03-30-2018)
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
You'll find many notations in the A.I.M. on illustrations (like for emblem hole locations) that reference distance from the "0" Line in S.V. (side view), P.V. (Plan View), F.V. (Front View), and R.V. (Rear View). Those are simply coordinates in the GM 3-Dimensional Body Measurement System, which are meaningless without a body surface plate and the Master Layout. I may be one of the few left who is familiar with the system and worked with it almost daily.
The following users liked this post:
59BlueSilver (03-30-2018)
#10
Le Mans Master
You won't find anything on it unless you happen to have a full-body surface plate with traveling height gages and crossbars, and the Body Engineering General Arrangement Layout showing the Master Datum Locations for body setup on the plate (the plant used it every day for dimensional process control analysis, done today robotically with vision systems and CMM machines).
You'll find many notations in the A.I.M. on illustrations (like for emblem hole locations) that reference distance from the "0" Line in S.V. (side view), P.V. (Plan View), F.V. (Front View), and R.V. (Rear View). Those are simply coordinates in the GM 3-Dimensional Body Measurement System, which are meaningless without a body surface plate and the Master Layout. I may be one of the few left who is familiar with the system and worked with it almost daily.
You'll find many notations in the A.I.M. on illustrations (like for emblem hole locations) that reference distance from the "0" Line in S.V. (side view), P.V. (Plan View), F.V. (Front View), and R.V. (Rear View). Those are simply coordinates in the GM 3-Dimensional Body Measurement System, which are meaningless without a body surface plate and the Master Layout. I may be one of the few left who is familiar with the system and worked with it almost daily.
GUSTO