C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Would you rather - original and matching number or modified C1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2018, 03:29 AM
  #1  
Taz007
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Taz007's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2018
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Would you rather - original and matching number or modified C1

As I unfortunately haven’t yet had the privilege to drive a c1 and I’m imbarking in purchasing one soon - wanted to get peoples options.

I want ant to be able to take the car out and obviously enjoy it and currently have found two. One is all original matching number 1959 single barrel with power glide. All mechanicals have been overhauled and rebuilt.

The other is a 1960 which has been upgraded with a 327ci with electronic points, 2 speed power glide and disc brakes etc.

what way would people go???

Popular Reply

12-22-2018, 07:32 AM
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,530 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
Default

I agree with Frankie on both his points.

Catalog-engineered cars with "upgrades" scare me. There is a risk that the "engineering" behind the "upgrades" neglected one or more important parameters and will fail. Too, the quality of the install depends on the skill of the person doing the work, always a big unknown.

I trust the original engineering which went into these cars. I'm not saying it reflects modern thinking because it obviously doesn't. But it does reflect the careful consideration of the engineers of the day and they were really sharp individuals.

Jim
Old 12-22-2018, 04:49 AM
  #2  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

??? I'm not hearing much difference between the two except the larger motor will hae a little more umph....
Electronic points are a wash. If it was a coin toss I'd rather have the original car all day long - no brainer for me...
Old 12-22-2018, 07:32 AM
  #3  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,530 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

I agree with Frankie on both his points.

Catalog-engineered cars with "upgrades" scare me. There is a risk that the "engineering" behind the "upgrades" neglected one or more important parameters and will fail. Too, the quality of the install depends on the skill of the person doing the work, always a big unknown.

I trust the original engineering which went into these cars. I'm not saying it reflects modern thinking because it obviously doesn't. But it does reflect the careful consideration of the engineers of the day and they were really sharp individuals.

Jim

Last edited by jim lockwood; 12-22-2018 at 07:33 AM.
The following 9 users liked this post by jim lockwood:
ah53 (12-22-2018), blue_74 (12-23-2018), C.T. (12-22-2018), jimgessner (12-22-2018), leif.anderson93 (12-22-2018), mark6669 (12-26-2018), Nowhere Man (12-22-2018), Rich Yanulis (12-22-2018), Todd H. (12-22-2018) and 4 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 12-22-2018, 07:54 AM
  #4  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,010
Received 6,944 Likes on 4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
I agree with Frankie on both his points.

Catalog-engineered cars with "upgrades" scare me. There is a risk that the "engineering" behind the "upgrades" neglected one or more important parameters and will fail. Too, the quality of the install depends on the skill of the person doing the work, always a big unknown.

I trust the original engineering which went into these cars. I'm not saying it reflects modern thinking because it obviously doesn't. But it does reflect the careful consideration of the engineers of the day and they were really sharp individuals.

Jim
X2 Also if you never driven one that is a must. They will not drive like anything you ever driven. And if your a big person you won’t fit to well
Old 12-22-2018, 08:27 AM
  #5  
Todd H.
Drifting
 
Todd H.'s Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,274
Received 423 Likes on 249 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (track prepared))
2019 C1 of Year Finalist (track prepared)

Default

As Frankie, Jim, and Nowhere are saying, not much difference in the "enjoyability" of the two examples you cite. I'd pick the '59 because it's more original. Are you sure you want an automatic?

Some of the guys on here really don't like the way solid axle Corvettes drive. I always wonder how many cars they've been exposed to. If a solid axle Corvette has been maintained properly, it will drive much the same as a no power steering-brakes Sting Ray, as long as they're both running fresh radial tires. If the steering and front suspension are worn out or improperly adjusted they're a real handful, like every other old car. You don't know which you're going to get until you go and look at it and drive it. Even the restored cars are seemingly often put together by guys that never heard of a torque wrench, because they drive like crap if not properly assembled.

Real tall husky guys don't fit well in them. I'm 6'2" 195 and I fit fine in my '57.
The following 2 users liked this post by Todd H.:
jimgessner (12-22-2018), ptjsk (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 08:41 AM
  #6  
449er
Race Director
 
449er's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2016
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 10,683
Received 4,713 Likes on 2,998 Posts
2023 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2021 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Default

If I am buying a C1, I would want the original car if possible
Old 12-22-2018, 08:42 AM
  #7  
68hemi
Race Director
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,048 Likes on 1,934 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

You guys are making a big deal over a few mods between the two cars the OP listed. Simple upgrade to a 327, disc brakes and a distributor upgrade are not a big deal. Personally I would rather have the bigger engine and disc brakes. OP only asked for a pick of the two cars listed.

Last edited by 68hemi; 12-22-2018 at 08:43 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Roger Walling (12-23-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 08:49 AM
  #8  
128racecar
Racer
 
128racecar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 420
Received 139 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Todd H.
Real tall husky guys don't fit well in them. I'm 6'2" 195 and I fit fine in my '57.
This is key before you even drive one. When I was selling my 57, there was more than one potential buyer I had come by that I knew wouldn’t buy the car the second I saw him get out of his car. At 6’ 1” and 175 lb, I was okay, but bigger guys around the waist were not. 58-62 do have more room than 56-57.
Old 12-22-2018, 10:03 AM
  #9  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,382
Received 5,554 Likes on 2,797 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Depends on how you want to use it. If your primary plan is to be judged, only drive it to shows, and crave originality (stamping, markings, and everything as it was from the factory), then stay stock with the ‘59. If you plan on driving it regularly and it is more about the drive, handling and comfort, go with the ‘60.

Personally, my ‘61 was my daily driver, so an upgraded engine, overdrive tranny, power steering, power disc brakes, small steering wheel and more comfortable/roomy seats was mandatory. Same with my ‘64 today. If outward appearance is you primary concern and you want to drive it regularly, there are upgrades you can make that don’t change the outward appearance much if at all, yet improve the driving and safety experience substantially. Good luck!
The following users liked this post:
Roger Walling (12-23-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 11:05 AM
  #10  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,010
Received 6,944 Likes on 4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid
Depends on how you want to use it. If your primary plan is to be judged, only drive it to shows, and crave originality (stamping, markings, and everything as it was from the factory), then stay stock with the ‘59. If you plan on driving it regularly and it is more about the drive, handling and comfort, go with the ‘60.

Personally, my ‘61 was my daily driver, so an upgraded engine, overdrive tranny, power steering, power disc brakes, small steering wheel and more comfortable/roomy seats was mandatory. Same with my ‘64 today. If outward appearance is you primary concern and you want to drive it regularly, there are upgrades you can make that don’t change the outward appearance much if at all, yet improve the driving and safety experience substantially. Good luck!
sorry but that’s silly. These cars where driven millions of miles by thousands of people for decades completely stock as GM designed it. They did not get changed over until people got spoiled by newer cars. So if you can’t enjoy them stock then your spoiled by new cars and it seems your never be happy with them.

Last edited by Nowhere Man; 12-22-2018 at 11:05 AM.
Old 12-22-2018, 11:15 AM
  #11  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,382
Received 5,554 Likes on 2,797 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Lol, you are a broken record at a time when records are obsolete.
Old 12-22-2018, 11:16 AM
  #12  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

Youll have to drive both, you may fall in love with one...or neither.
As said "restored" means nothing if the work was done by a hack. THese are old cars and need to be looked after periodically

Buy what you really like..if youre doing it for $ or what others think youre not going to enjoy it at all. Stock, what color, options or not doesnt matter.
6'3 220 Ill probably never be able to fit in one.

Last edited by cv67; 12-22-2018 at 11:17 AM.
Old 12-22-2018, 11:18 AM
  #13  
Pop Chevy
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Pop Chevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Sarver Pa
Posts: 4,570
Received 784 Likes on 536 Posts
2021 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

I myself would take the upgraded one . My 60 has lots of power and needs lots of stopping ability, but let's not start that pissing war about drum vs disc brakes AGAIN. "To each his own" I like Hot Rods !
The following 3 users liked this post by Pop Chevy:
appelen (12-22-2018), dcamick (12-23-2018), ptjsk (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 11:22 AM
  #14  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,010
Received 6,944 Likes on 4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid
Lol, you are a broken record at a time when records are obsolete.
records are making a come back weather you believe it or not. But why do you find that funny. How did all those new car owners drive those cars new when they didn’t know any better. I will admit I am spoiled by new cars but when it comes to driving old cars I enjoy the simplicity that comes with it.
Old 12-22-2018, 11:45 AM
  #15  
jimgessner
Safety Car
 
jimgessner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Bandera Texas
Posts: 4,148
Received 638 Likes on 382 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 128racecar


This is key before you even drive one. When I was selling my 57, there was more than one potential buyer I had come by that I knew wouldn’t buy the car the second I saw him get out of his car. At 6’ 1” and 175 lb, I was okay, but bigger guys around the waist were not. 58-62 do have more room than 56-57.
I agree. Today my ''big gut'' will NOT fit behind the steering wheel. Maybe if bodied as race car 57's with the short column.
Old 12-22-2018, 11:56 AM
  #16  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,382
Received 5,554 Likes on 2,797 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Originally Posted by Nowhere Man

records are making a come back weather you believe it or not. But why do you find that funny. How did all those new car owners drive those cars new when they didn’t know any better. I will admit I am spoiled by new cars but when it comes to driving old cars I enjoy the simplicity that comes with it.
Yes they are and I have a few.

You and I represent two ends of this hobby. What was good enough in the 60’s is not good enough for me today. We are both aligned that these are great vehicles, but I believe if I can add modern performance, comfort and safety while preserving the beauty of the original design I should do it. The GM designers in the ‘60 were limited by the technology of the time. I am not. We both show our position across multiple threads where you question anyone who wants to change or upgrade from original and I encourage people to pursue their own originality. Your response is predictably, “If you want modern performance and comfort, buy a modern car.” This position completely misses the point. The design, the simplicity, and the rawness of the experience can be preserved while making the car yours and unique in its own way to please your personal vision. It is not about either/or, it is about both.
The following 3 users liked this post by Factoid:
blown454 (12-23-2018), DUB (12-25-2018), Roger Walling (12-23-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 12:23 PM
  #17  
Nowhere Man
Team Owner
 
Nowhere Man's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,010
Received 6,944 Likes on 4,783 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

No but to tell people these cars are no fun in stock form is where I have a problem. I agree you can make these cars into anything your bank account can pay for. But not everyone wants a reto mod and not everyone wants a stock car. I get that. But let people figure that on there own by getting a base line of what stock is. My biggest regret on my Chevelle is I never drove one without power steering, power brakes and disk brakes. But I added all that to mine. If I driven it without all that I might not ever needed to up grade. I driven Corvettes with both and I could care less either way. And your responses are predecitble too. So let’s agree to disagree. But there is plenty of room in this hobby for both guys like us. We just need to respect OUR opinions

Last edited by Nowhere Man; 12-22-2018 at 12:24 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Roger Walling (12-23-2018)

Get notified of new replies

To Would you rather - original and matching number or modified C1

Old 12-22-2018, 12:29 PM
  #18  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

The C1 in original trim is truly like driving a "fast tractor"

That was the allure of it in my '61.... I'm C1-sized at well under 6' and 175lbs with my shoes on....it does make a difference...

I won't get into the urinary competition about engines, but as I stated, gimme the original motor over the "mystery mill" that may or may not be a dog or have cobbled together parts....

There is the consideration of future value and I would think, all else being equal, the original car is the better expenditure of funds... But opinions are like......mmm....what's that saying again ?

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 12-22-2018 at 12:30 PM.
Old 12-22-2018, 12:59 PM
  #19  
jet-tech
Pro
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Here's my 2 cent.

I would not buy a vette with a power glide transmission again unless I was unable to drive a manual. For me, driving a sports or muscle car with a manual is a much better driving experience and may be harder to sell in the future.

if the car is not completely original you won't feel guilty about making performance and safety upgrades.
Old 12-22-2018, 01:08 PM
  #20  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,422
Received 5,331 Likes on 2,775 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Taz007
As I unfortunately haven’t yet had the privilege to drive a c1 and I’m imbarking in purchasing one soon - wanted to get peoples options.

I want ant to be able to take the car out and obviously enjoy it and currently have found two. One is all original matching number 1959 single barrel with power glide. All mechanicals have been overhauled and rebuilt.

The other is a 1960 which has been upgraded with a 327ci with electronic points, 2 speed power glide and disc brakes etc.

what way would people go???
Keep in mind that Corvettes started keying engine block VIN derivatives to the car's VIN in 1960, so even though a car is loosely described that way, a 1959 cant really be "numbers matching," only "correct" when considering the block number, casting date and assembly code. Multiple engines could be plugged in there and be considered "correct."

I liked my 1958 to be as stock as possible, but as Frankie says, they are like driving a tractor. Radial tires are a must.


Quick Reply: Would you rather - original and matching number or modified C1



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.