When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I understand that GM used the 327 in a number of vehicles over a number of years. Casting numbers on my 66' 327/300 show up on the Chevelle...Camaro....even some El Camino's. My question is.... What is the difference in the Corvette 327 block.... and the block's used in those vehicles? Casting number is the same. Is the motor...essentially the same? Thanks.
Corvette block cast date has one digit for the year. Passenger blocks had 2 digits.. Now that's the way it is in my 63 but not sure about other years. But it is an interesting question and I would like to know too.
Corvette block cast date has one digit for the year. Passenger blocks had 2 digits.. Now that's the way it is in my 63 but not sure about other years. But it is an interesting question and I would like to know too.
Corvette small blocks have a single digit for the year because ALL Corvette small blocks came from Flint. All Flint small blocks have a single digit for the year, regardless of whether they were bound for Corvettes or not.
By the same token, ALL small blocks with two digits for the year came from Tonawanda and no Tonawanda small blocks were used in Corvettes.
Corvette small blocks have a single digit for the year because ALL Corvette small blocks came from Flint. All Flint small blocks have a single digit for the year, regardless of whether they were bound for Corvettes or not.
By the same token, ALL small blocks with two digits for the year came from Tonawanda and no Tonawanda small blocks were used in Corvettes.
So if someone has a small block C2 with a 2 digit date, even though the stamping would appear to be correct, then it would be a restamp block out of a pass car.
So if someone has a small block C2 with a 2 digit date, even though the stamping would appear to be correct, then it would be a restamp block out of a pass car.
As Jim says..........although there are a few (very few) exceptions. NCRS 1965 Judging Manual has this info. There was a brief period when swaps were done between Flint and Tonawanda engine plants for contingency planning. The block casting # is 3858180. It is a small block casting.
However ALL machining and assembly for Corvette small block engines was done at Flint............so they carry the "F" or the "V" (67) engine assembly prefix.
Tonawanda cast and machined all the big block engines during the C2 period.
The motor carries the "F" designation on the stamp pad... but indicates it's from a '66 Chevelle 327/300 hp. There are no VIN stamps on the pad leading me to believe it's not the original motor. The casting numbers from the rear near the bell housing match the casting numbers on the base model Corvette motor 327/300. Question is: Is this essentially the same block that came with the Corvette base model 300/327? Internals the same? Thanks.
The motor carries the "F" designation on the stamp pad... but indicates it's from a '66 Chevelle 327/300 hp. There are no VIN stamps on the pad leading me to believe it's not the original motor. The casting numbers from the rear near the bell housing match the casting numbers on the base model Corvette motor 327/300. Question is: Is this essentially the same block that came with the Corvette base model 300/327? Internals the same? Thanks.
REGARDLESS of what car/Corvette/truck an engine was installed in, a Flint block is a Flint block and a Tonawanda block is a Tonawanda block.
As already mentioned, Corvettes ONLY received small blocks from Flint. BUUUUUUUUUUUUT, Flint built engines also went into mega thousands of other Chevrolet vehicles-----------------------and so did Tonawanda built small blocks-----------------------BUT NOT CORVETTES.
If a Corvette does not have its born with engine, then it is NOT a numbers matching engine -----------------------ESPECIALLY if it has a Tonawanda built engine. BUUUUUUUUT, if a Flint engine, with the correct casting date was located, and when it was machined at the machine shop, and the machine shop "accidentally" surfaced the decks and removed the STAMPED numbers from the stamp pad, then it sorta kinda could pass as a correct engine. That's all I'm going to say about that------------------you can read between the lines.
The 66 Chevelle never had a advertised 327 with 300 hp. It only had the 327/275 engine which by rule of GM no vin stamp on the engine pad. Has only engines with a advertised HP of 300 or above in passenger cars got a vin stamp. But basically it was the same engine as the Corvette 300 minus the carb and exhaust manifolds. But the block was identical. There is no such thing as a corvette only block
Is this essentially the same block that came with the Corvette base model 300/327? Internals the same? Thanks.
Ken asked if the internals were the same. As you stated, carb and exhaust manifolds were different. Block was the same. I would venture to say the pistons, crank, rods, cam, and valves were also the same.
sure do. all but the oil pan, carb, dist, exhaust manifold, air cleaner, and stickers its the same. Flint was casting and building 300 engines a HOUR. the more shared parts the better.
sure do. all but the oil pan, carb, dist, exhaust manifold, air cleaner, and stickers its the same. Flint was casting and building 300 engines a HOUR. the more shared parts the better.
The oil pan is actually not the same. The Corvette oil pan is a little shallower and has the drain plug in the center, where passenger cars have it on the side.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.