When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone have Duke’s updated paper? My L72 has an LS6 cam and I believe both lifters are not actually on the base circle when the relevant piston is at TDC on the power stroke. His paper has updated lash specs and the procedure for which valves to adjust every 90 degrees of engine rotation.
Anyone have Duke’s updated paper? My L72 has an LS6 cam and I believe both lifters are not actually on the base circle when the relevant piston is at TDC on the power stroke. His paper has updated lash specs and the procedure for which valves to adjust every 90 degrees of engine rotation.
Mark, see below....
Last edited by FLYNAVY30; Aug 23, 2021 at 08:32 AM.
Another option is to use the EO/IC method..... When the Exhaust starts to open, adjust the Intake. When the Intake starts to close, adjust the Exhaust. Yes, it requires rolling over the motor more, but it works.....
Another option is to use the EO/IC method..... When the Exhaust starts to open, adjust the Intake. When the Intake starts to close, adjust the Exhaust. Yes, it requires rolling over the motor more, but it works.....
This is the method I’ve been using as of late. At first I thought it would take forever but it seems to actually go pretty quickly. I usually draw out a sketch showing the cylinder layout, firing order and intake/exhaust valves and just go through each cylinder and record the value on each valve as I go and it goes pretty quick with minimum chance of confusion.
The LS6 cam is the same as the L-71 cam, which is the same as the L-78/78 cam except this early cam has an oil groove in the rear bearing. The same lobe is used on both sides. If you didn't have a machine shop cut that groove in the later cam your L-72 would have seized up long ago.
For the '65 L-78 the recommended valve lash was .020/.024". For '66 and later it was increased to .024./028". I don't' know why. I do know that the clearance ramp height on the lobe is .012", and 1.7 x .012 = .0204".
Like small block rockers the big block rocker ratio is not constant, but I don't have a reliable data set of rocker ratio behavior through the full range of lift.