When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Greg, you just spent four paragraphs (in post#49) denigrating those who don’t agree with your way of thinking, then have the audacity to say you can “Have this discussion all day without insulting another member”. Which is it?
Greg, you just spent four paragraphs (in post#49) denigrating those who don’t agree with your way of thinking, then have the audacity to say you can “Have this discussion all day without insulting another member”. Which is it?
Your credibility is non-existent.
Yup. Greg would rather score points than discuss the issue. He wants to show you how clever he is, rather than address any point you bring up. It’s worthless to the discussion.
As the OP, I’m going to ask the mods to close this thread, it was meant to invite vigorous discussion, not personal assaults.
well, in fairness you did put “escalation” in the thread title.
I think those who are offering knowledgeable insights into cars on BaT are usually pretty easy to spot, and the rest of the comments can fall by the side if you’re looking to glean more about the car/C2 in general.
it’s a shame that there were disingenuous arguments made in this thread, as that doesn’t help anyone, stranger or friend.
OK, I know when I'm licked!
If the majority prefer it the other way I'll give up the argument.
No hard feelings guys, you're all still my Corvette brothers.
Before the close, I'll sign up for Greg's position, 100%. Most but not all the self identified experts chiming in on every BaT C2 auctions simply want to announce to the world their vast knowledge of C2s. Roy is an exception as are a few others. The ones that really know speak the least. The ones that speak the most know the least. BaT has become like FB. Another place to type incessantly; lies, truths, and pure babble. Adults should be able to figure out for themselves what used car to buy, and what not to buy. If a mistake is made, adults learn from the experience and move on.
I hear you. But do you draw a distinction between people who point out all the non-correct this and that, vs. someone who spots a blatant lie or intentional misrepresentation of a car?
Before the close, I'll sign up for Greg's position, 100%. Most but not all the self identified experts chiming in on every BaT C2 auctions simply want to announce to the world their vast knowledge of C2s. Roy is an exception as are a few others. The ones that really know speak the least. The ones that speak the most know the least. BaT has become like FB. Another place to type incessantly; lies, truths, and pure babble. Adults should be able to figure out for themselves what used car to buy, and what not to buy. If a mistake is made, adults learn from the experience and move on.
Greg's post #49 makes a logical argument, to which I agree with. With respect to Bat however, they encourage the peanut gallery by having a comment section. That and the fee's capped at $5k is what keeps them cooking I think
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every Model vs Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!
Joe Kucinski
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!
Joe Kucinski
10 Things C8 Corvette Owners Hate (But Won't Tell You)
Joe Kucinski
10 Best Corvettes Coming to Barrett-Jackson Palm Beach 2026!
Brett Foote
Every Corvette Grand Sport Explained! (C2, C4, C6, C7, & C8)
Joe Kucinski
Grand Sport & Grand Sport X Launch Alongside All-New 535hp LS6 V8!
Michael S. Palmer
5 Reasons Bad Drivers Crash & 5 Ways to Avoid a Costly Mistake!
Joe Kucinski
7 Bolt-On Upgrades From Extreme Online Store to Level Up Your C6 Corvette
How about responding to any claims made by the seller that one finds fault with? That way you are not a nit-picker but an interested party trying to pin down an issue. If he claims it's a 66 when we all know it is a 65 then I believe it is appropriate to comment but not to say things that one sees wrong with the car if the seller has not claimed otherwise.
How about responding to any claims made by the seller that one finds fault with? That way you are not a nit-picker but an interested party trying to pin down an issue. If he claims it's a 66 when we all know it is a 65 then I believe it is appropriate to comment but not to say things that one sees wrong with the car if the seller has not claimed otherwise.
I know of a recent BAT auction where the seller (a dealer of some note) claimed that a ‘63 SWC was a “numbers matching” car. He had to walk it back when someone from this Forum provided conclusive evidence that it was not (an old For Sale ad on this Forum where a former seller energetically stressed that the car was NOT numbers matching and “not for the purist”).
Even after he walked back the claim, he started an EBay auction where he AGAIN listed the car as having “the numbers matching engine under the hood”. When I called him on this in a direct message, he unabashedly admitted that it was a restamp. But left the verbiage in his EBay listing intact. He only changed the BAT listing because he had no choice; the comments were public and visible.
As a multiple C2 owner I’m enjoying the recent value increases of my cars (though the only practical effect is to increase my insurance costs), driven, to a large extent by the huge dollar sales of some very questionable vehicles on BaT.
Philosophically, I have mixed feelings about this. Should I try to help BaT bidders comprehend the crap they’re buying, in the process getting shouted down by shills and unknowing cheerleaders, or should I ignore my conscience and join the legions of yes men raving about an early 63 fuelie SWC with a beautiful new trim tag, mis-located fuelie emblems, and a host of parts that don’t belong on an early 63 car? (Or any 63, for that matter).
It makes me wonder if we’re on the cusp of a new day, one where originality is so blurred by several new generation’s ignorance of these vehicles that no one knows what’s what, or cares. Maybe that’s inevitable, I should just laugh and go on with life…
i am no NCRS informed corvette owner, so there is that. Say what you think, be prepared for contrary folk, and unless some one is in your face, in person, live and let live (you know, to an extent)....i hope, when you sell your car, you get a good return on your investment....but, then you won't have the car.
I have bought a few cars off BaT. I have also NOT bought a few cars off BaT b/c of the comments that were made. I researched some information that someone made in the comments section and found issues that made the cars not worth buying....very thankful that comments section exists. Yes there is a bunch of bad info on there but there is also good info in those discussions. It's up the buyer to sift through them. I think anyone buying or selling on BaT is aware of the comments section and understands before participation. I think it's really useful when the sellers aren't being completely up front about things.
Re-stamped engine cars are "numbers-matching" all the time. Where is the deception?
We all know that “numbers-matching” is supposed to be synonymous with original. This is the time-honored definition. Any other abuse of the semantics is dishonest. Let’s not try to be cute. There was clear intent to deceive.
Born with, oem, numbers match, date match, etc. are all progressively more obscure terms trying to form some relationship or even deceit towards having a prospective buyer pay extra for the car. If someone says their car in “numbers matching” and technically it is without declaring it was a restamp, but clearly a poorly done restamp most people (perhaps not all) will either lower their asking price or walk away wondering what other trickery awaits them.
The simple answer on BaT, given we are debating something completely out of our control, is to not click on the site. Easy peasy.
Well there you've said it. "we all know.." Who are you to determine or declare what "is supposed to be" or what is "time honored tradition". Who says it's abuse of semantics?
I never say "numbers-matching" and others don't either. But apparently you do, in very limited circumstances. But I don't get to say how people can or cannot describe classic cars. What gives you the right to decide how others describe classic cars? Nothing does. Who are you to say who is trying to be deceptive and who isn't? Get down off your high horse for just a moment and think about whether or not it's your right, or your job to determine how anyone else but you engages in the hobby of classic corvettes.
if you have ever spent any time in a court of law you would understand how a term like “numbers matching” has come to be. In the legal world it is a car that has numbers matching on the title to the numbers on the drive train components REGARDLESS as to how well done they are or not. It is a get around to stating that it MAY or MAY NOT have the “born with” engine. So if you want to use a catch phrase use this one to identify an original engine as there is no denying what that means.
Here we are in the C1/C2 forum with members defending the use of (usually) intentionally misleading terms on the basis that they are technically correct.
Here we are in the C1/C2 forum with members defending the use of (usually) intentionally misleading terms on the basis that they are technically correct.
Your statement is a good example of how things can get misconstrued. You are correct in that the term IS technically correct.
I for one am not DEFENDING anything just rather the opposite and pointing out what you have to watch out for with these terms. For the uneducated buyer they can be fooled into thinking that a “numbers matching” described car can be an original drivetrain car. The term is commonly used today by dealers for sure. They use it to protect themselves from legal action down the road and in some cases rightfully so. They buy and sell cars that they may or may not know the real story about the car, may have a good enough re-stamp with correct casting numbers/dates to fool many and finally not all dealers are as smart as some think they are, but smart enough to know how to protect themselves legally.
Individuals use this term also for the same reasons. Some KNOW what they have and use it to protect themselves and some simply use it AGAIN to protect themselves because they may not be sure or have any PROOF of what the car actually is.
As others have noted, there is wiggle room in the term "numbers matching." That's one way lawyers keep themselves busy.
But, we should recognize that, even though "numbers matching" doesn't exactly mean "original to the car," it means more than just a matching number somewhere. I mean, if I write my VIN on my engine's valve cover with a grease pencil, I don't think anyone is going to say, "he wasn't lying when he said that's a 'numbers matching' car." Saying "numbers matching" carries at least some implied claim of originality or at least correctness.
Bottom line, though, is that the buyer has to perform his due diligence. The peanut gallery on BAT can be helpful, but it's still on the buyer to make the final decision and to live with it.