Help on restamp question
#1
Help on restamp question
Ok so I recently bought a 1965 Corvette. The last 3 numbers on the deck have been stamped over to match the vin Does anybody know if GM ever did this because I ran the other numberunder the restamp and it is 1 day prior of production date of my vin. ????? Or do you think someone found a correct date coded block that was close to the vin # Im baffled
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,162
Received 7,017 Likes
on
4,821 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
There was a such thing as factory grind outs where they did such things. How you tell them apart from someone who did it 50 years later I have no clue
#3
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,455
Received 5,637 Likes
on
2,833 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Please post a pic. That will really help.
The following users liked this post:
John BX NY (04-29-2024)
#5
Burning Brakes
The factory did do odd things . . here is a pic of my original rear frame stamp from the factory. The front vin stamp was correct and not like this "mistake".
#6
Administrator
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,514
Received 5,364 Likes
on
2,788 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Factoid (05-02-2024)
#7
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 3,122
Received 1,122 Likes
on
577 Posts
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
Well, three possibilities 1) it’s factory re-stamp on an engine that was pulled the previous day for a repair, or other odd reason. Not likely, as the factory would not have even tried to align things so perfectly. 2) It’s a factory stamp (for the earlier car) where someone re-stamped the VIN back in the day (before anyone cared about originality) and put it your car. Or 3) it’s the dumbest, most bubba’d restamp ever.
#9
Team Owner
The following users liked this post:
L78 (05-02-2024)
#10
Administrator
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,514
Received 5,364 Likes
on
2,788 Posts
Ok so I recently bought a 1965 Corvette. The last 3 numbers on the deck have been stamped over to match the vin Does anybody know if GM ever did this because I ran the other numberunder the restamp and it is 1 day prior of production date of my vin. ????? Or do you think someone found a correct date coded block that was close to the vin # Im baffled
#11
Burning Brakes
The "twos" do not look the same . . the curve on the second "2" doesn't match that of the first so . . my guess is restamp by a non factory person.
#13
Pro
That's my guess... and it seems more plausible than someone just happening to find an engine from the previous day and doing the worlds worst restamp in an attempt to counterfeit matching numbers
#14
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,162
Received 7,017 Likes
on
4,821 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
would be interesting to know how the off line heavy repair section of the line handled engine stamping if a problem occurred.
#15
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting in his Nowhere land Hanover Pa
Posts: 49,162
Received 7,017 Likes
on
4,821 Posts
2015 C2 of Year Finalist
#17
Race Director
I believe Al Grenning is the foremost expert on Corvette stamp pads in the world. Al has spent the last 40+ years studying and photographing engine stamps, and has interviewed the people at Tonawanda, Flint and St Louis responsible for stamping the pads. Al regularly does seminars for the NCRS on stamp pads and I've been to a number of them. From what I've learned, typically when a mistake was made when stamping a pad at either the engine plant or the assembly line they did a grind out. A grind out is just what it sounds like, they took a hand held grinder, ground off the mistake and restamped the pad with the correct information. From photos I've seen it's pretty obvious when a grind out has been done because the grind out leaves an obvious circular grinding mark under the stamping.
I've never seen a pad that had a new number stamped over another one, except in the case of a double tap, and I'm not sure it's even possible for it to happen with a different number on the assembly line. How the gang holder was used as described by Al Grenning, was that at the beginning of each shift the gang holder was loaded with the first VIN to be stamped. Once that first block was stamped, only the digit(s) that needed to be changed for the next VIN were removed from the holder and replaced. If the first VIN stamped was xxxxxxx410003, only the "3" was removed and replaced with the "4". This would continued till they got to 10009, at which point both the "0" and the "9" would be removed and the "1" and "0" were added. This would continue till the end of the shift, when the gang holder was emptied completely. It was probably done this way because the person doing the stamping probably didn't have the time to empty and fully reload the gang holder for each VIN, and there was no need to completely empty it for just one or two digits. If this is the way that they stamped VIN's at St Louis, and I believe it is, there's no way that a block would be stamped with three wrong digits unless they were going from "099" to "100", "199" to "200" etc., which is not the case here. Occasionally something would happen like dropping the gang holder and the stamps would fall out and need to be reloaded, but even in this case if a mistake was made it would likely be made by putting the right digits in the holder, in the wrong order. From the numbers I see on that pad that couldn't be the case with this VIN.
I'm not willing to say that it's 100% not a factory screw up, if for no other reason then the broach marks are there and look good, but what I see is completely outside what I've learned would be how a mistake was usually corrected.
This is a pad that really would be worth having Al Grenning at CCAS Affirmation review, but the cost to do this is not cheap. I think he's now charging around $1500 for his expertise.
https://www.ccas4vettes.com/
I've never seen a pad that had a new number stamped over another one, except in the case of a double tap, and I'm not sure it's even possible for it to happen with a different number on the assembly line. How the gang holder was used as described by Al Grenning, was that at the beginning of each shift the gang holder was loaded with the first VIN to be stamped. Once that first block was stamped, only the digit(s) that needed to be changed for the next VIN were removed from the holder and replaced. If the first VIN stamped was xxxxxxx410003, only the "3" was removed and replaced with the "4". This would continued till they got to 10009, at which point both the "0" and the "9" would be removed and the "1" and "0" were added. This would continue till the end of the shift, when the gang holder was emptied completely. It was probably done this way because the person doing the stamping probably didn't have the time to empty and fully reload the gang holder for each VIN, and there was no need to completely empty it for just one or two digits. If this is the way that they stamped VIN's at St Louis, and I believe it is, there's no way that a block would be stamped with three wrong digits unless they were going from "099" to "100", "199" to "200" etc., which is not the case here. Occasionally something would happen like dropping the gang holder and the stamps would fall out and need to be reloaded, but even in this case if a mistake was made it would likely be made by putting the right digits in the holder, in the wrong order. From the numbers I see on that pad that couldn't be the case with this VIN.
I'm not willing to say that it's 100% not a factory screw up, if for no other reason then the broach marks are there and look good, but what I see is completely outside what I've learned would be how a mistake was usually corrected.
This is a pad that really would be worth having Al Grenning at CCAS Affirmation review, but the cost to do this is not cheap. I think he's now charging around $1500 for his expertise.
https://www.ccas4vettes.com/
The following 2 users liked this post by gbvette62:
blue_74 (05-04-2024),
provette67 (04-30-2024)
#20
Race Director
This is a pad that really would be worth having Al Grenning at CCAS Affirmation review, but the cost to do this is not cheap. I think he's now charging around $1500 for his expertise.
https://www.ccas4vettes.com/
https://www.ccas4vettes.com/