When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
does anyone have experience with this shim kit? not concerned with the fastener hardware, just the shim quality and fitment. it's about half to a third the price of the usual vendors. thanks
sorry, for some reason i can't get the link to work. this is the description and item number:
it's an amazon listing and the companies name is Laformo LFMOT001095
Stainless Steel Trailing Arm Shim Kit With Hardware Compatible With 1963-1982 Chevy Corvette (Never Rust.)
They look like they will be good. You'll have to drill a hole for the cotter pin like I did when I rebuilt the rear end but they are MUCH easier to do alignments with than the original hole type.
thanks for the input guys and diablo, thanks for fixing the link. i was mainly trying to determine if the shims in this kit were dimensionally accurate and there was enough variety in thickness to do an accurate toe setting. i went ahead and ordered it, i figure at this price it's not the end of the world if i can't use it.
also, while i've got you here, the chassis manual tells you how much change in castor or camber you can expect for a given thickness of shim. i couldn't find that info for rear toe. not absolutely necessary but would be nice.
also, while i've got you here, the chassis manual tells you how much change in castor or camber you can expect for a given thickness of shim. i couldn't find that info for rear toe. not absolutely necessary but would be nice.
I thought the shims were for rear toe in and the strut rods were for camber. Didn’t know you could change the rear caster.
I think he was saying with some abbreviation, that the FSM posts shim thickness data for camber/caster on the front end - but doesn’t provide similar data for how much toe is affected by various shim thicknesses on the rear suspension. Actually that wouldn’t be to difficult to figure out with a bit of geometry.
I think he was saying with some abbreviation, that the FSM posts shim thickness data for camber/caster on the front end - but doesn’t provide similar data for how much toe is affected by various shim thicknesses on the rear suspension. Actually that wouldn’t be to difficult to figure out with a bit of geometry.