When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
That stamping looks okay to me from here although the original broach marks may have been inadvertently removed by improper cleaning of the stamp pad. Chevy engine plant at Flint used capital letter I's as the number 1 in block stampings - don't ask me why.
That stamping looks okay to me from here although the original broach marks may have been inadvertently removed by improper cleaning of the stamp pad. Chevy engine plant at Flint used capital letter I's as the number 1 in block stampings - don't ask me why.
Nothing about this says re-stamp to me: character use, shape, spacing, and baseline alignment all looks great.
The timeline from engine assembly to VIN is a tad longer than "normal" at 4 weeks (12/15/65 to ~1/12/66) but maybe with the holidays or other delays (rail slowdowns, weather, etc) isn't a red flag for anything. Most timelines are a couple-three weeks.
Last edited by barkingrats; Jan 18, 2026 at 12:44 PM.
arent no broach marks a telling sign ? what makes the stamp look good that it isnt restamped?
flint was producing about 300 engines an HOUR I doubt they changed the cutting heads often. If you really want to have peace of mind find known real blocks assembled the same day as yours and compare. Or pay Al Greening his fee
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
Originally Posted by Maxim819
Ok cool. No sign of restamp ?
While the original broach marks would help to confirm no restamp was done, the letters and numbers in those stamps look right as rain to me. IF it was a restamp it was very well done.
that pad was painted once by observing the paint in the letters.
it has a aged patina
it has a aged edge and not a sharp pad.
it looks decades old .. probably more than a couple.
but the paint on the numbers may mean a rebuild and paint.. unless previous owners painted the pad and then removed the paint on the pad and let it patina out.. or was already patina'ed
arent no broach marks a telling sign ? what makes the stamp look good that it isnt restamped?
Whether in person or by photo, to determine broach marks requires much better lighting and higher resolution. They can be quite fine to fairly coarse depending on the broach's wear. And, because of past cleaning efforts, the back area next to the head is going to be a better place to see them rather than toward the front edge. In the pic this area is in shadow.
Even if assembly date is the same as another block, you won't know that the blocks were broached on the same date. Additionally, I don't know how many block broach lines Flint had going, so a comparison also may not be definitive without knowing they went through the same machine. I don't think there's any way to determine either thing.
yes, blocks were cast, broached, machined, then went into a room to sit there to be built.. did the factory have more than 1 room? more than 1 broacher? was policy absolutely first in and first out, or first in last out in that room. the build dates of the engine can be weeks or months apart with 2 cars ( vin x and vin x+1) in line at the car assembly plant..
and... when a rebuild shop does a shot peen/cleaning of the block to be rebuilt, the broach marks are now gone...even without decking the block.. and the stamp is untouched.
all sorts of things can happen and cause one to suspect the stamp pad.. doesn't mean it is not the original engine.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.