When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
K24 might be August '69 since there was no May '69 production. We'd know for sure with the consecutive unit number.
Mike,
I'm going from memory on this one, but pretty sure that "K" is the June code for 1969... I sold my '69 last year, but I know it was a July built car with an "L" build code.
Regardless, your comment about cross-checking against the VIN is a good one. A Monza red paint code is pretty desirable in the used Corvette market... It's always nice to confirm that the trim tag is probably the one that was originally installed on the car.
It doesn't (exactly), but ending consecutive unit numbers are known for some months so it's a matter of taking ending numbers from two known months and determining where the VIN in question fits. As an oversimplistic example, let's say June '69 production ended with 501, July '69 ended with 750, and August '69 ended with 1000. The consecutive unit number in question is 777. We know it wasn't produced in June or July, so #777 would have been assembled in early August.
You can also use the Time Build date with the consecutive unit number and get closer. Let's say #774 has a Time Build date of August 5 and #778 has a Time Build Date of August 7. Our fictional #777 could have been assembled on the 5th, but since the first car assembled on the 7th was #778, we can conclude #777 was the last car built on the 6th.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.