C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

new rear spring problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #41  
...Roger...'s Avatar
...Roger...
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,528
Likes: 53
From: Dayton, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Wuttin
The instructions are available on the VBP website...they are wrong.

http://www.vbandp.com/instructions/h...ruct/42300.htm

I contacted them when I installed my monospring last year because the ears on the mounting plate were bending when trying to meet the 40-45 ft-lb torque spec (and I wasn't even close to the spec!). They assured me the plates were actually an improvement over the original GM, but not to torque them to spec or they'd bend (amazing). I snugged everything up and haven't had a problem, but I'll be taking a closer second look to be sure. I love the feel of the spring and I'd do it again, but I strongly suggested they correct their instructions before the litigation kicks in...
Wow-Your correct-what a shame.On your 4 bolt design the 2-FE7 plates would fix yours right up and allow you to torque the bolts up.Leaving them loose-I dont think that sounds very accurate.Whats loose mean-thats what a torque spec. is for.I think if a company is going to sell a product to replace another they should be responsible enough to do it right.Shame Shame
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #42  
rihwoods's Avatar
rihwoods
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,100
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by DWncchs
Wow-Your correct-what a shame.On your 4 bolt design the 2-FE7 plates would fix yours right up and allow you to torque the bolts up.Leaving them loose-I dont think that sounds very accurate.Whats loose mean-thats what a torque spec. is for.I think if a company is going to sell a product to replace another they should be responsible enough to do it right.Shame Shame
They must have a reason for the reduced torque....as I understand,they tested their spring on Vettes....
Also,reading their instructions,I wonder how many guys ignored or missed the part about "jacking" on the spring...that may explain how some broke after install...

Rich
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #43  
...Roger...'s Avatar
...Roger...
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,528
Likes: 53
From: Dayton, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by rihwoods
They must have a reason for the reduced torque....as I understand,they tested their spring on Vettes....
Also,reading their instructions,I wonder how many guys ignored or missed the part about "jacking" on the spring...that may explain how some broke after install...

Rich
The reason for the reduced torque is because there is nothing but rubber to torque against and they haven't come up with a better plan than to just leave the bolts loose.At bear minumum they could instruct to apply some thread lock so the bolts wont work their way out.That is the reason GM put the plate in on the 3 bolt design mounting plate so there would be something for the 2 rear bolts to torque against,the single front bolt bottoms on the housing.Rich if you look at your old TRW you can see it is surrounded by rubber AND there is steel around the outside to torque against.They tell you never to jack against the fiberglass spring but what happens when it works its way over against the steel mounting bolts-its the same thing it can fracture the spring.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #44  
greyghost79's Avatar
greyghost79
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Wuttin
I contacted them when I installed my monospring last year because the ears on the mounting plate were bending when trying to meet the 40-45 ft-lb torque spec (and I wasn't even close to the spec!). They assured me the plates were actually an improvement over the original GM, but not to torque them to spec or they'd bend (amazing). I snugged everything up and haven't had a problem, but I'll be taking a closer second look to be sure. I love the feel of the spring and I'd do it again, but I strongly suggested they correct their instructions before the litigation kicks in...


yup, that's exactly what mine did. ends of mounting plate starting bending before i got any reading on my torque wrench. i got them torqued only to about 10 pounds and the plate is "u-shaped" under the spring now. i've not had any problems and it's not gotten loose in several years but i'm not comfortable with it.

What are these "FE-7" plates and where can i get them?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #45  
...Roger...'s Avatar
...Roger...
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 16,528
Likes: 53
From: Dayton, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by greyghost79
yup, that's exactly what mine did. ends of mounting plate starting bending before i got any reading on my torque wrench. i got them torqued only to about 10 pounds and the plate is "u-shaped" under the spring now. i've not had any problems and it's not gotten loose in several years but i'm not comfortable with it.

What are these "FE-7" plates and where can i get them?
The standard (9 leaf) spring in your 79 was 2.5" wide but the optional (7 leaf) "FE-7" or Gymkhana was only 2.25" wide so GM used this pair of plates to fill in that .25".Both of these springs were steel.So Gm intended them to be used that way however I have used them with the VBP type spring to limit how far the rubber will crush.These will allow the rubber to be crushed to 2" thick and then you can achieve your torque spec and you dont have to leave them loose and the plate wont bend. They are 1/8" thick,2" tall and about 6" long.The measurement your concerned about is the 2".Measure the thickness of the rubber mount on your spring.Look at Richs top pic in post #23-the plates will fit like the white ones in that pic.Hope this helps.

http://www.ecklers.com/product.asp?p...dept%5Fid=1826
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #46  
VBP's Avatar
VBP
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 1
From: St Petersburg FL
St. Jude Donor '07,'13
Default Spring Problem

Since Texaswilkins was having some issues and this thread started, I had Gary, my tech, write this for me to post.

We set up the parts in our shop to duplicate your situation as best we could. I saw the pictures you emailed Pattie. If you would like, we can send you some spacer shims, similar to some other ones mentioned in recent forum postings. We could also send some tubular spacers that could go on the shanks of the plate kit bolts, between the plate and the housing. This gap has not been an issue before, but we see what you are getting at. We have sold literally thousands of C-2 and C-3 rear springs, at the 2-1/4” width, and have not experienced any problems. We could easily cut our slabs to the 2-1/2” width. This would require a widened urethane pad set-up like the ones we have molded for us right now.

If all the suspension components are up to snuff, there should never by any longitudinal forces (shifting forward or aft) of the tip ends of the spring. The spring strictly supports the weight of the car, while the other components, such as the trailing arms and strut rods, guide the spindle assembly through the motion of wheel travel. The spring cushions have a curvature and isolate the ends of the spring so normal pivoting action can occur.

I would definitely stay with the composite (fiberglass) spring rather than the steel one for ride and handling improvements. I hope this information is of some help. Please call Gary, toll free at 1-800-237-9991or email through Pattie at pattie@vbandp.com if you need further information or parts sent or would like to discuss this further.

Sincerely,

Gary G.
Tech Department
VBP (Vette Brakes and Products)
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE