When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
POLL: Chrome Bumper Conversion Kit for Rubber Bumper 'Vettes
After keeping up with Sevensteps original thread, I still find no poll on who with rubber bumpers would buy a chrome bumper conversion kit if one was offered. I have no dog in this hunt but also don't consider myself a "chrome bumper elitist" as a couple of posts in the original thread have called those of us who own a '68-'73. It's your car, do what you want.
So, vote if you wish and let's see what the verdict is...
Id do it if the cost was under 1500 but I would only want the chrome rear. It would have to be a bolt on kit that could be returned back to stock as well. Its never going to happen though....
I voted No but not because I like the rubber bumpers. It would be MAJOR surgery so best bet if you want steel bumpers is to sell the rubber bumper car and by a steel bumper car.
I voted No but not because I like the rubber bumpers. It would be MAJOR surgery so best bet if you want steel bumpers is to sell the rubber bumper car and by a steel bumper car.
It is not "major surgery at best". You need to go back a re-read the original thread. We are talking about a bolt-on kit that replaces the front nose piece only. There is no "surgery" except what is entailed in ubolting the original nose piece and bolting the new one on.
Without pictures of a completed prototype and all of the negative posts in my last thread and "poo=poos" of the idea, I completely expect more "no" votes than yes..
It is fashionable and trendy to "like what ya got" and not wish it was something else and I understand that...However, if this kit was done right, it would be successful and people would want it.
You would have to see a completed car and compare all angles to a "before" shot to really be able to grasp what the kit consisted of and how much more desireable it would look.
Voting now "NO" based on not enough specifics of the completed model, what labor is involved, the quality, and most importantly what it LOOKS like, is uninformed at best.
I am a huge fan of chrome bumper cars and my dream car is a 1970 (my birth year) big block 4-speed, red of course. I am, however, happy with my red '77 l-48. Someday I will get my dream car but until then, I'm satisfied with what I have. I'm all for modifying cars too but there are certain things I feel shouldn't be done like putting a big block hood and emblems on a small block car...for that matter putting l-82 badging on an l-48. Another thing that really gets my goat is people who put z-71 4x4 stickers on 2 wheel drive trucks. I guess these people don't think a person can tell the difference???
It is not "major surgery at best". You need to go back a re-read the original thread. We are talking about a bolt-on kit that replaces the front nose piece only. There is no "surgery" except what is entailed in ubolting the original nose piece and bolting the new one on.
The nose is different so would not be a bolt on. Only way to do a bolt on would be to create a "different" front bumper assembly that would fit the different nose. But that would not look like the original steel bumper cars. The rear chrome bumpers would be even more surgery as the quarters and deck are different. Would require a major grafting operation.
But I guess that a reasonable cost steel bumper setup could be designed to replace the rubber bumper caps if you did not care if it did not look like the original steel bumper cars. Would be more of a custom car look.
Without pictures of a completed prototype and all of the negative posts in my last thread and "poo=poos" of the idea, I completely expect more "no" votes than yes..
It is fashionable and trendy to "like what ya got" and not wish it was something else and I understand that...However, if this kit was done right, it would be successful and people would want it.
You would have to see a completed car and compare all angles to a "before" shot to really be able to grasp what the kit consisted of and how much more desireable it would look.
Voting now "NO" based on not enough specifics of the completed model, what labor is involved, the quality, and most importantly what it LOOKS like, is uninformed at best.
There are no pictures of a prototype! There is no prototype! There are no specifics! And I don't want a steel bumper on my 76! I have fiberglass bumpers glassed in to the body and they look great.
Seven, you need to understand that not everyone likes what you like. If you want this "bolt on" faux pre 73 bumper thing, then go for it, get with several companies and convince them they'll make big bucks on this deal.
My dos centavos.
I did not vote because I don't have rubber bumpers. That said, I am not an elitist, and I am certainly not against someone doing this. I am only thinking that the price to do it may be prohibitive. The direction this poll is taking is part of the positive next steps I mentioned in the other thread. Get good data to create a sound business case and you might convince someone to take on the R&D.
BTW: My '69 will not be stock, so I too have made multiple mods including wheels, steeroids, killer lights conversion, hydroboost brakes, fiberglass spring, sidepipes, the list goes on. I won't likely use the stock paint color either. I enjoy well done modified cars. IMHO, I still think there is not a great enough return on investment for a company to undertake this product but if I'm wrong it wouldn't be the first time.
The idea reminds me of those Ferrari Testarossa body kits that they were putting on Fiero's back in the 80's . . . sure, they sold a few- but its just wrong.
The nose is different so would not be a bolt on. Only way to do a bolt on would be to create a "different" front bumper assembly that would fit the different nose. But that would not look like the original steel bumper cars. The rear chrome bumpers would be even more surgery as the quarters and deck are different. Would require a major grafting operation.
But I guess that a reasonable cost steel bumper setup could be designed to replace the rubber bumper caps if you did not care if it did not look like the original steel bumper cars. Would be more of a custom car look.
Exactly...Just something to make it look more like what GM should have done to it starting in 1973...Here's a quick photoshop from another user of what one may look like...
It looks OK but IMHO, this idea would NOT "sell like hot cakes" like was said in the other thread. Most of us with rubber bumpers are perfectly happy with our cars.
Last edited by SteveG75; May 31, 2007 at 12:25 PM.
The pic above does not look too bad but I think a chrome front, rubber rear is just wrong.
It looks OK but IMHO, this idea would NOT "sell like hot cakes" like was said in the other thread. Most of us with rubber bumpers are perfectly happy with our cars.
I looked very closely at my rear bumper....It could be custom designed the same exact way. Give it the 80-82 style spoiler, (reminiscent of the 68-72 rear spoilers), but pull the contour in to a more concave style and don't recess the tailights. The whole rear bumper cover could be remolded to resemble a 1972 style along with a chrome "bumper" that attached to via specialized brackets and hardware that came with the kit.
I looked very closely at my rear bumper....It could be custom designed the same exact way. Give it the 80-82 style spoiler, (reminiscent of the 68-72 rear spoilers), but pull the contour in to a more concave style and don't recess the tailights. The whole rear bumper cover could be remolded to resemble a 1972 style along with a chrome "bumper" that attached to via specialized brackets and hardware that came with the kit.
But then you would have to remove the reinforcement bar. I actually had to have the shop custom trim my bar in order to keep it when I swapped to the 80-82 rear. Sorry, I just don't think the safety hazrd is worth it.
That said, you could probably do the mod for about $1500 per an end. That is assuming mass production which I do not see the demand for.
Exactly...Just something to make it look more like what GM should have done to it starting in 1973...
Don't know if I would agree with you there about what GM should have done.
Here is a statement regarding comments from Larry Shinoda:
"Larry Shinoda, the famous Corvette designer, once commented in an interview that the 1973 was his favorite of the post-1967 era because the front and rear styling were closest to what the stylists originally had in mind when this series was first designed."
(Illustrated Corvette Buyer's Guide by Michael Antonick).
I voted no because I happen to like the rubber bumpers. The chrome bumpers are ok, but not as much to my personal taste. I think some kits would sell, doubt there would be enough though to make any $ on them.
Kind of a neat idea tho
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.