When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The LS6 was the 71 BB rated at 425 HP. The Ls5 was a good motor with a ton of torque. The LT1s had less of them made so they are probably more desireable than the LS5 motored Vettes. They ran close to the same 1/4 mile times. The BB had a ton of torque the LT1 was more of a fined tuned racer motor. The LT1 was better balanced due to the lesser weight.
The LS6 was the 71 BB rated at 425 HP. The Ls5 was a good motor with a ton of torque. The LT1s had less of them made so they are probably more desireable than the LS5 motored Vettes. They ran close to the same 1/4 mile times. The BB had a ton of torque the LT1 was more of a fined tuned racer motor. The LT1 was better balanced due to the lesser weight.
Thanks-I keep hearing LT1, lower production and same time etc.
I am not a fan of the big block hoods, woould the LT1 have to have that?
Does the scoop design offer aditional airflow?
I have a base 72, but would like a 70-72 Vert LT1 - I think.
Will check them out in person as I see em more and more.
...that's how many were made...it would be interesting to know how many of each are still on the road today.
So i guess it depends on what you mean by desirable. The LT-1 might be considered more desirable today because it is more rare (less desirable 35 years ago because less people bought them?). However big blocks are certainly desirable cars...also the LS5 has the higher HP rating over the LT-1's
So i guess it depends on what you mean by desirable. The LT-1 might be considered more desirable today because it is more rare (less desirable 35 years ago because less people bought them?).
Less LT-1s were sold because the LT-1 option was significantly more expensive than the LS5, not necessarily because it was less desirable. The LT-1 was a true high performance engine with solid lifters, large Holley carb, transistor ignition, and aluminum high-rise intake manifolds. In addition, all LT-1s came with 4speed, most with M21 and 3.70 or 4.11 gears. The LS5 did have slightly more hp, but it also had more weight. 0-60 and 1/4 were very close but overall performance the LT-1 was/is better. Yes I'm a biased LT-1 owner. I've owned 2 70s and a 71.
Thanks-I keep hearing LT1, lower production and same time etc.
I am not a fan of the big block hoods, woould the LT1 have to have that?
Does the scoop design offer aditional airflow?
I have a base 72, but would like a 70-72 Vert LT1 - I think.
Will check them out in person as I see em more and more.
Yes they do have the BB/LT1 hood. The hood was needed for the high rise alum intake on the LT1. My car is a 72 LT1 vert. The LT1 motor is long gone as is most of the original stuff. The body and int. still are pretty much stock. Different wheels are the only thing noticable.
Yes they do have the BB/LT1 hood. The hood was needed for the high rise alum intake on the LT1. My car is a 72 LT1 vert. The LT1 motor is long gone as is most of the original stuff. The body and int. still are pretty much stock. Different wheels are the only thing noticable.
Gordon, Is this because the car's been in several different hands over the years or by choice? I'm in your general area and beginning to take a look at LT-1s. I'm trying to get a handle on the market and availability for original equipment cars.
Gordon, Is this because the car's been in several different hands over the years or by choice? I'm in your general area and beginning to take a look at LT-1s. I'm trying to get a handle on the market and availability for original equipment cars.
Long story on this car. Short one is I am the 14th owner of this car. Most never even had it 2 years. I/my dad bought it in 91 as a pretty beat up car. It had a 78 350 passenger car engine in it. It did only have 46K miles on it. I have records of the titles and all the owners before me so the mileage is pretty true. I restored it back to original as much as we could and made it road worthy in 94. Dad retired and I bought it back in 96. I have been modifying it ever since. The stock car was OK but it is in no comparison to what I have now. It is faster and handles better than stock. I still have some of the original stuff but doubt it will ever go back to stock.