C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

'70 LT-1 Car and Driver Test Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2008, 11:39 AM
  #1  
Midyrman
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Midyrman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 1,263
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts

Default '70 LT-1 Car and Driver Test Results

Does anyone know the exact results of the Car Life and Auto Tech (I think that was the name back then) article from 1970 for the LT-1? I believe the times were under 6 secs for the 0-60mph and around 14 sec for the 1/4.....both traction limited.

Thanks!
Old 01-26-2008, 02:22 PM
  #2  
StickShiftCorvette
Drifting
 
StickShiftCorvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Car and Driver didn't test the '70 Corvettes.

For '71 (low compression) 0-60 was 6.0 sec with the 1/4 in 14.57@100.55 mph. I am taking these numbers from a CD reprint book of 68-77 road tests.

I recall Hot Rod getting much better times from a '71 or '72 LT-1 with a 1/4 mile time of 13.85 @105 (certain about the time, less so the speed) - it was a 4.11 4 speed car.

While there were traction issues, I don't think 0-60 or the 1/4 was traction limited with any factory small block. 0-60 was traction limited on hot (425-430-436 HP rated) big blocks.
Old 01-26-2008, 03:28 PM
  #3  
dennis
Drifting
 
dennis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,949
Received 88 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Midyrman
Does anyone know the exact results of the Car Life and Auto Tech (I think that was the name back then) article from 1970 for the LT-1? I believe the times were under 6 secs for the 0-60mph and around 14 sec for the 1/4.....both traction limited.

Thanks!
I remember vette mag doing a comparison between the 70 LT 1 and the (at the time), new lt1. Guess it was early 90's.

I may still have the mag, but the 70 was in the low 12's with a rear tire swap and tweeking the carb/timing. Think they talked about breaking the 11's( if memory serves me)
Old 01-26-2008, 09:37 PM
  #4  
mstanton
Drifting
 
mstanton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2003
Location: Upstate South Carolina
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dennis
I remember vette mag doing a comparison between the 70 LT 1 and the (at the time), new lt1. Guess it was early 90's.

I may still have the mag, but the 70 was in the low 12's with a rear tire swap and tweeking the carb/timing. Think they talked about breaking the 11's( if memory serves me)
Low 12s. Breaking 11s. That sounds fast. How did the 70 compare with the new LT-1. I own a 70 LT-1 and 92 LT-1, both stock. The 70 "feels" way faster.
Old 01-26-2008, 11:05 PM
  #5  
dennis
Drifting
 
dennis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,949
Received 88 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mstanton
Low 12s. Breaking 11s. That sounds fast. How did the 70 compare with the new LT-1. I own a 70 LT-1 and 92 LT-1, both stock. The 70 "feels" way faster.
no contest
Old 01-26-2008, 11:32 PM
  #6  
wfo76
Drifting
 
wfo76's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: MS
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Car Life (Aug70)

M21/4.11

0-60 5.7 sec
0-100 13.5 sec
1/4 mile 14.17 @ 102.15 mph

car was fully loaded with every option except PS and defroster

Old 01-27-2008, 10:26 AM
  #7  
Midyrman
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Midyrman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 1,263
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts

Default

Thank you.

I recall the article mentioning the F70 tire being on the thin side given the size of the wheel wells and that a wider factory tire would have easily lowered those times-- and they were wondering why GM didn't use a wider tire.
Old 01-27-2008, 10:41 AM
  #8  
ZR-111
Heel & Toe
 
ZR-111's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys I hate to rain on your parade here. The chances on a SMB doing under 14's would be a miracle. At the time I ran a 70 340 six/pak and the best time I could do was 13.91 I remember a 70-W30 blew me away with a 12.00 flat, Now that was a monster as a mater of fact the W30 pretty much was a monster and it could blow away most BB Vettes at the time. It's nice to dream. later
Old 01-27-2008, 11:25 AM
  #9  
Barry's70LT1
Drifting
 
Barry's70LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 1,867
Received 831 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZR-111
Sorry guys I hate to rain on your parade here. The chances on a SMB doing under 14's would be a miracle.
Sorry, I hate to rain on your parade, I ran consistent 13.1s with F60 Goodyear Polyglass in the early 70s.
Traction was still a problem with the 60 series.

The times quoted in the magazines were with stock tires
and traction issues were a real problem.
The stock F70 tires were almost useless off the line.

If you took those same cars today and put some good sticky tires
on them, then the times would be more representative of their performance.

Thanks
Barry
Old 01-27-2008, 12:47 PM
  #10  
dennis
Drifting
 
dennis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,949
Received 88 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZR-111
Now that was a monster as a mater of fact the W30 pretty much was a monster and it could blow away most BB Vettes at the time. It's nice to dream. later

I do agree with your dreaming part...

Get notified of new replies

To '70 LT-1 Car and Driver Test Results




Quick Reply: '70 LT-1 Car and Driver Test Results



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.