When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm looking at a '71 whose body build date is 3 months and 3 days past the date on the engine pad. Most cars I've seen it's usually about a 1 month apart. Should I consider this a big red flag or did it sometimes take this long to assemble the car at the factory?
BTW - all other dates line up perfectly (engine casting date, etc..)
My '69 has an engine pad date of 3/25/69 and a trim tag date of June 23, 1969, just shy of 3 months. There was a 6-8 week strike during that time period, however.
I seem to recall a strike affecting the '71 model year also, don't have details.
I'm looking at a '71 whose body build date is 3 months and 3 days past the date on the engine pad. Most cars I've seen it's usually about a 1 month apart. Should I consider this a big red flag or did it sometimes take this long to assemble the car at the factory?
BTW - all other dates line up perfectly (engine casting date, etc..)
Not totally unusual.
For reference, my November 71 car has an August 71 motor, september carb and october heads.
I'm looking at a '71 whose body build date is 3 months and 3 days past the date on the engine pad. Most cars I've seen it's usually about a 1 month apart. Should I consider this a big red flag or did it sometimes take this long to assemble the car at the factory?
Could have been once the body was assembled, it had to sit and wait on some part for an option on the car or was sent back to the body shop for major repairs and sat until they got back to it. As pointed out...not unusual and especially as you show...all other dates line up.
There was a strike during October and November of 1971. There were no cars built in October and only 449 in November. The strike actually started the end of September.