Please help explain disappointing dyno result (long post)
Yes, vortecs are great, but since I'm on the other side of the big pond Vortecs are just as expensive as aluminum heads (which is why I chose edelbrocks).
How would milling the heads turn out?
Compressioin ratio
Cyl.: 8
Bore: 4"
Stroke: 3.484"
CC: 64
Head gasket thickness: 0.052"
Head gasket bore: 4.1"
Piston to Deck clearance: 0.025"
Piston type: flat/dished, 13cc
Quench distance: 0,077
Displacement: 350 cui
Calculated static compression ratio: 8,68
Cam timing and overlap
Advertised intake duration: 268
Advertised exhaust duration: 280
Lobe separation: 110
Intake lobe centerline: 106
Seat timing
Intake, open: 28 (ABDC)
Intake, close: 60 (ABDC)
Exhaust, open: 74 (ATDC)
Exhaust, close: 26 (ATDC)
Overlap: 54
Total cam advance: 4
Dynamic stroke lenght
Crank stroke: 3.484"
Rod length: 5.7"
ADV Intake closing angle: 60
Dynamic stroke lenght: 2,874"
Distance of piston from BDC: 1,484"
Calculated Dynamic Compression ratio: 5,409
I fiddled with some numbers, swapping pistons to say 5 cc flattops and headgaskets to Mr. Gasket 0.020 (1130) would do both my static as my dynamic compression good, keeping these heads: 10.1:1 static and 6.42:1 DCR.
However having the heads milled to 61 cc (read somwhere 3cc is about maximum... true/false?) and thinner gasket gets me 9,59:1 static and 5,933 DCR.
The second option allows me to do it myself, the first requires a shop to swap pistons and everything that comes along with that.
What is wise??










