When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The sound level will of course depend on your choise of engine, but I think glasspacks are much louder than reverse flow.
I have a modified 427 bowtie L88 with hooker sidepipes. I tried glasspacks (3" ID), and it was laud as thunder (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_9xpvaURUM). Then I installed reverse flows and the loudness dissapeared, and it sounded more "metallic". But the muffler was way too restrictive for the engine - it couldn´t get enough flow - so now I re-installed the glasspacks and welded in some race cones. The race cones took just an edge off the sound level, so I´m still looking for new setups.
If to choose glasspacks you could go for the one with smaller inner diameter which will lower the sound level too.
But anyway - if you do have an almost stock smallblock, the glasspacks migth be perfect and give a cool rumbble....
Im not saying I want it quiet. I just want to be able to have a conversation with the passenger without yelling. I've tried the hooker max flows (to loud) STS baffles (sounded to tinny) sweet thunders (to loud). It seems theirs no middle of the road for my 427 w/460+HP. So Im going to try the reverse flows.
Im not saying I want it quiet. I just want to be able to have a conversation with the passenger without yelling. I've tried the hooker max flows (to loud) STS baffles (sounded to tinny) sweet thunders (to loud). It seems theirs no middle of the road for my 427 w/460+HP. So Im going to try the reverse flows.
Let me relate this little tale before you plop down your cash for the reverse flows. .
Years ago when I tried them for the first time on a very mild smallblock I dropped them in the side tubes, slipped the side tubes over the collectors (which was a pretty tight fit). For whatever reason I decided to fire the motor before I cranked down the clamps. I was surprised how quiet they were and ever so slightly I blipped the throttle....and blew both side tubes off! Hows that for back pressure?
Driving impressions were not good either, seat of the pants power was way down.
It your moneys, makes your choice
Let me relate this little tale before you plop down your cash for the reverse flows. .
Years ago when I tried them for the first time on a very mild smallblock I dropped them in the side tubes, slipped the side tubes over the collectors (which was a pretty tight fit). For whatever reason I decided to fire the motor before I cranked down the clamps. I was surprised how quiet they were and ever so slightly I blipped the throttle....and blew both side tubes off! Hows that for back pressure?
Driving impressions were not good either, seat of the pants power was way down.
It your moneys, makes your choice
Yellow 72. Now I believe you, put reverse flows in yesterday (had to prove it to myself, its one of those stuborn dutch things if your not from Pa. you would'nt understand). Now its to quiet and the backpressure is exactly as you explained. Took it for a ride and it would'nt go. I had all the bolts tightened down and the pressure actually pushed the tubes back 3/8 of an inch I could tell that because I saw where the never-seize line was from installation.
Yellow 72. Now I believe you, put reverse flows in yesterday (had to prove it to myself, its one of those stuborn dutch things if your not from Pa. you would'nt understand). Now its to quiet and the backpressure is exactly as you explained. Took it for a ride and it would'nt go. I had all the bolts tightened down and the pressure actually pushed the tubes back 3/8 of an inch I could tell that because I saw where the never-seize line was from installation.
The value of this forum aye.
I have a side pipes with reverse flow side pipes. I have just installed 427 bb engine, and to be honest I am some what disapointed with its performance !
Looks like these reverse flow pipes may be the issue!
Back in the late 70s, I had the Hooker sidepipes on my Pontiac T/A. I first had the glass-pack inserts in, and yes, they were LOUD. You could hear me coming from 2 blocks away. Later on, I tried the reverse-flow inserts. I agree with all of the above comments, in that they were more restrictive, but I could at least hear myself think.....
Pulled the trigger and ordered some maxi flow hookers from summit.
#21046HKR
I tried to order some sweet thunder inserts, but never got any reply....
( I often find US companys that are not interested in international orders)
I did get a prompt responce from STS, but there price and freight options made the hookers about half the price.....
So out come the reverse flow baffles and hopefully I will not attract too much interest from the cops ...... and hope to find that "missing" hp!!
Those MaxFlow Hookers look pretty cool...I REALLY need to do something about my rusted-out inserts, but haven't been able to pull the trigger on STS Baffles. Wish they weren't so expensive.
Does anyone else have the MaxiFlow inserts? Pretty safe to say they're less restrictive than the Glasspacks, right?
The Max Flows were the first inserts I tried and they flow great but the volume with a coupe car was too loud and very DEEP tone. Obviously a lot of the sound and volume will vary depending on your engine compression, cam and overall horsepower.
I put the glass pack inserts in and they brought the volume down but I could tell the flow was sacrificed too so I had a custom set of inserts made but I'm working on the car now so I haven't had a chance to install them and shoot a video. The link in my signature will take you to a video with the Max flow inserts at idle with a few revs which sounded great but under load was a different story for me anyway.
The Max Flows were the first inserts I tried and they flow great but the volume with a coupe car was too loud and very DEEP tone. Obviously a lot of the sound and volume will vary depending on your engine compression, cam and overall horsepower.
I put the glass pack inserts in and they brought the volume down but I could tell the flow was sacrificed too so I had a custom set of inserts made but I'm working on the car now so I haven't had a chance to install them and shoot a video. The link in my signature will take you to a video with the Max flow inserts at idle with a few revs which sounded great but under load was a different story for me anyway.
The sound from the current reverse flow inserts is great, still quite loud but good tone. The main issue is the engine is way sluggish! On talking with my engine guy he says he has had this problem with these types of baffles in the past.
The 427 BB feels by the seat of the pants like driving a strong 350 sb, not a modified BB. The previous owner of the engine had run 10's in 1/4 with it.
I have dropped the comp from 13:1 to 10.8:1 and replaced the old iron closed chamber heads with Brodix race rite heads, only other change in the LS6 manifold, in place of the single plane deal.
I know I will have lost some hp's, opinion is it still should go ok.......
We shall see shortly i guess
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Had 'glasspacks, sold reverse flows without every trying them, and planning on MaxFlows this time around. Sweet Thunder would be my second choice. STS are a bit tinny to my ear. Wondering how cones and MaxFlows would sound...
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.