Missing ZL-1?
I respect the Horse power issues, however i saw with my own eyes, the Gold car in Ohio with 16,000 miles on the dyno and it hit 640HP If i remember correct it was 642.2hp to be exact. I also saw the dyno results of a 69 L-88 car with 5400 miles and the dyno sheet was 538.3. I can tell you this, the ZL-1 motors were a very different animal. The cam timing has something to do with a big horse power gain in the engine as well as the head configuration. Like i said many people think the ZL-1 and L-88 are the same engine with an aluminum block, They are not they are TOTALLY different beasts.
I respect the Horse power issues, however i saw with my own eyes, the Gold car in Ohio with 16,000 miles on the dyno and it hit 640HP If i remember correct it was 642.2hp to be exact. I also saw the dyno results of a 69 L-88 car with 5400 miles and the dyno sheet was 538.3. I can tell you this, the ZL-1 motors were a very different animal. The cam timing has something to do with a big horse power gain in the engine as well as the head configuration. Like i said many people think the ZL-1 and L-88 are the same engine with an aluminum block, They are not they are TOTALLY different beasts.
I'm not saying it isn't true; I'm saying you should establish your credentials for making these statements.
And who verified the documentation on the white car?
Identifying yourself would help.
As you can imagine, lots of anonymous people post some very interesting things on this forum.
You guys do know about the only 1970 LS-7 in existance, right?
I need to clarify the white car again. This car is a DOCUMENTED REAL ZL-1 car. The tank sticker of the car has been verified and the orginal owner has sworn to the car being real. It was not a conversion as was rumored. That rumor came from a painted block in the car. Research has proven that the assembly plant INDEED painted the aluminum blocks. This was their way of getting the ZL-1's out the door. The dealer did not switch the car to a ZL-1 motor. They replaced the painted block with a non painted block, but BOTH blocks were aluminum and the cars tank sticker has the L-88 option as well as the ZL-1 option. Hence a REAL PRODUCTION ZL-1.
Last edited by early shark; Sep 21, 2009 at 08:17 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I don't know much about the cars, but I bought my first L/88 engine in early 1970 and have owned one or two of the cars.




i also read early on in this thread about the red ZL-1 car being run then showing up later with the 454r motor a year later. This is true and false at the same time. The chassis of the cars were the same however the bodies were not. that car was actually destroyed by GM as a "pilot car" program.
bigdaddyvet, until we know who you are (really) and what facts you stand on, you are full of poop and there isn't anyone here who should take you seriously.
Regards,
Mark Donnally
He also inquired if I was Roy Bratz (a slight misspelling of his last name), my complete profile is listed.
Last edited by early shark; Sep 22, 2009 at 12:58 AM.
I am not talking about the article that was in Corvette Enthusaist magazine.
Anyway, this article had a picture of the original tank sticker for the car. I have seen the tank sticker, and I seem to recall that it listed the color as Monaco Orange.
Can anyone locate that article and confirm that the color listed is Monaco Orange.
I do not believe that this car was repainted. The original owner told me he ordered the car with that color specifically to support the Gulf Oil racing program. Gulf Oil exec had to call Chevrolet and convince them to build the car with an automatic, so Gulf Oil was involved before the car was built.
Good to see you posting here!
Was that the first or second tank sticker this car showed up with?

I did a pre-purchase inspection for a gentleman who was interested in buying this car a few years ago. The trim tag was the real deal and was definitely coded for Monaco orange... End of story.
What I have learned from my research:
Chevrolet records indicate two ZL-1 optioned Corvettes were produced for sale during the 1969 model year.
There is no supporting evidence that these Chevrolet records are 100% accurate or complete.
The ownership history and documentation on the Daytona yellow car is sufficient to convince me that it was originally built as a ZL-1 Corvette at the St. Louis assembly plant.
There is no supporting evidence that the Daytona yellow car is one of the two that Chevrolet claims that they built for sale. It might be, but there is no documentation to prove that it is.
The remaining cars (Monaco orange, Can Am white, and Lemans blue) have issues to varying degrees. That doesn't mean that they were not originally ZL-1 cars, but it does create doubt as to what they originally were built as.
I am unaware of a Riverside gold car. Not to say that there wasn't one, but in 30 years of fanatically tracking Corvettes of this era, I think that I would have heard something about it.
If I had Donnally's money
and dropping several million dollars on a 1969 Corvette was an option, the only car that I would make an offer on (at this point in time) is the Daytona yellow car that Roger owns.Regards,
Stan Falenski

















