When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I bought a Edelbrock carb at a swap meet, never been on a car. My mistake was I listened to the guy selling that told mee it was a 600 cfm. When I got home I checked the numbers to find that it was a 500, model 1404. I have a friend with a Edelbrock 750, model 1407, willing to swap for the 500. My concern is, would the 500 will be to small but the 750 be to large, cfm wise? I have a rebuilt 350 325 hp motor with edelbrock performer intake.
Any advise on which would be my best route or should I just lookm for a 600. Will eventually be doing a 383 just happen to have the 350 for another project I was going to do so I thought I would put it in the vette for now.
Last edited by 929nitro; Jul 29, 2009 at 02:21 PM.
Thanks for the advice. I'm leaning towards doing the swap and just buying a 600 for this motor and keeping the 750 for the 383, since the 750 only has about 10k miles on it.
The "common wisdom" is that a bigger cfm carb will give you more high end Hp, while a smaller cfm carb will give you more torque at a lower rpm. Ganey's data, although it does support the idea, surprised me by how small the differences were. He only got 1 Hp difference between the 600 and the 750 Edelbrocks.
If I remember right I was told that a basic 350 engine draws in between 600 to 650 cfm. So anything above that is pretty much wasted. Which is why I was concerned about both carbs in my original post. Correct me if I am wrong. I can turn wrenches but not up on a lot of technical performance stuff as to what is best to use. Triing to learn.
The "common wisdom" is that a bigger cfm carb will give you more high end Hp, while a smaller cfm carb will give you more torque at a lower rpm. Ganey's data, although it does support the idea, surprised me by how small the differences were. He only got 1 Hp difference between the 600 and the 750 Edelbrocks.
PK, I think everything is relative. If you up the CFM on any one piece of an engine's air intake system you must ensure that each component down the line matches that CFM rating. So, the intake may be the next bottleneck or the heads.
PK, I think everything is relative. If you up the CFM on any one piece of an engine's air intake system you must ensure that each component down the line matches that CFM rating. So, the intake may be the next bottleneck or the heads.
cc
That makes sense.
I was also thinking down the lines of engine size and rpm too. If I have a 350 cubic inch engine turning at, say, 5000 rpm, I am filling each cylinder with air/gas mixture 2500 times per minute, which works out to 2500x350/1728=506 cubic feet per minute so I think that means a 500 cfm carb won't get me past 5000 rpm no matter what other components are on the system. Of course, this assumes a vacuum of 0 at WOT, which is probably an OK assumption for a weekend hobbyist like me, but probably wouldn't get me very far in the world of carburetor design. Using PV=nRT, the volume and pressure are geometrically related so 3 inches of Hg at WOT would give me about a 10% increase in the volume in the manifold, so I might get it done, but I would be cutting it real close.