When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
are the later c3's with cross fire injection good or bad? Im looking at a couple of them but i noticed GM didnt keep the CFI around too awful long? are there things to look for with these?
From: Out Where the Buses Don't Run, Eglin AFB/ Niceville FL
2025 C8 Z06/7/E-Ray of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Modified
2021 C6 of the Year Winner - Modified
2020 C7 of the Year Finalist -- Modified
2020 C6 of the Year Finalist - Modified
They are good in that they are a reliable system and get great fuel economy. They are bad because there are not a lot of performance mods you can do and they were only in production on the Vette for two years (82,84).
No problems with mine. Runs like a top and very fuel efficient and reliable. Actualy I think GM used this system on most of its cars through the early 90's?? Its just that the Vettes had Dual TBI instead of one??
There are people out there that will tell you that the Cross-Fire is junk, but I disagree. Lot's of owners have gotten thousands of miles of trouble free driving from them. Technology was changing rapidly at that time. GM developed the Tune-Port system and replaced the Cross-Fire with it, because it was more efficient and could be made to produce more power, than the Cross-Fire.
If there's a rub with the system, it's the availability of parts and the lack of knowlegable people around still to work on them. This is a legitimate concern, but I won't let keep me from buying my "dream" car.
Last edited by gbvette62; Jan 4, 2011 at 06:31 PM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.