When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Here's the '70 LT1 I bought last fall for a chunk less $$$ than his price. It's in mostly original paint, original interior, and the tank sticker is still in place. It does have the original white top which needs to be replaced. Rust-free... I haven't taken interior pictures, but it's very good w/no dash cracks or seat rips, etc. The carpet is worn beneath the floormats(!), but it's all very good driver-quality.
If you ever get the urge to cut that car loose, drop me an email... rowdyrat@aol.com.
Sold to a new owner for $22,500 plus shipping to Florida.
I must admit I was pretty surprised.
I would have loved this particular car but knew I wold be way upside down at that price by the time I got it done.
Seller was a great guy too.
Bill
The seller was very honest, being up front about the restoration engine. I suspect many may not be so. Apparently the price was NOT out of bounds for what the market will pay. Strikes me many posters here tend to be a bit harsh when estimating value. I'm no expert on LT1's but the price didn't strike me as that far out of line when considering what other cars have sold for. I have to agree with the posters who say after 5 years or so of patina the engine will probably become the original again...
Curious, what issues did you see with the stamp pad? Wondering if many would notice?
Roger,
The "broach marks" look suspect, even from a so-so photograph. I would imagine that in person, under magnification it would be very apparent that they are not broach marks.
The VIN derivative has a major issue. Take a look at pad photos of cars near this one and you should be able to pick it out.
I didn't pull any photos of the assembly stamp so I have no comment on that. The first two areas were enough to get my attention.
This re-stamp is better than most that get posted on this forum, but it is still pretty easy to spot if you know what you are looking for.
The "broach marks" look suspect, even from a so-so photograph. I would imagine that in person, under magnification it would be very apparent that they are not broach marks.
The VIN derivative has a major issue. Take a look at pad photos of cars near this one and you should be able to pick it out.
I didn't pull any photos of the assembly stamp so I have no comment on that. The first two areas were enough to get my attention.
This re-stamp is better than most that get posted on this forum, but it is still pretty easy to spot if you know what you are looking for.
Regards,
Stan
Where would I find the photos you refer to? I gather you're suggesting I look at pad photos from a car built around the same time as this one? Something unique to that time period?