When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi skip your right the welds are bad but make sure you take a close look for cracks I had a friend steam clean my frame to get oil and grease off what I found was scary
...It would seem the someone at GM would have sent some of these frames back to AO Smith...
Originally Posted by 454Luvr
...Maybe they did...
Frames were inspected at A.O Smith prior to shipping to St. Louis and inspected again when received at the plant. It is not likely any "bad" frames got through the quality control process, but stranger things have happened.
I think you are looking at a typical Corvette frame of that time period and not liking what you see. That does not mean the workmanship was crappy or that the frame is\was bad. It means you have a typical, regular production item which met GM specifications.
Hi skip your right the welds are bad but make sure you take a close look for cracks I had a friend steam clean my frame to get oil and grease off what I found was scary
That's exactly what mine looks like " a cats *** sewn shut with a grapevine"
That's exactly what I said while reading this.... UNION MADE .. THAT is the reason it was allowed...I saw a former GM CEO apologize for the garbage they built in the 70s and 80s.
I see no issue here, folks. It's a moot point asking why GM "allowed" anything forty five years ago. The A. O. Smith Company made frames which met the GM engineering specifications of the time.
Exactly! The supplier made the product that GM specified, which would not have been the best frame possible but rather a frame that was adequate to be safe, perform to specifications, and last the desired time frame at the lowest cost possible. That is how machinery is manufactured if you agree with it or not. Design Engineers DO NOT get an open check book to design with. If the frame is safe, does the job, and is reliable then the product is adequate for use. Doesn't have to be pretty and doesn't have to have the best welds. GM never intended for these cars to still be around ..... they are in the business to sale you new ones, not to keep the car forever.
Originally Posted by Skip Burney
What ever happened to taking pride in your work. I have seen cars much older with better quality work on them. I can totally understand the production aspect of things but some of the welding I see on both my 72 and 73 is just shameful. It would seem the someone at GM would have sent some of these frames back to AO Smith.
If the frame met the engineering specification, why would quality send the frame back to the supplier? Actually, they couldn't even if they wanted to. Something called a contract. You can't expect AO Smith to eat the cost of a frame just because the welds don't look nice. The frame held together and lasted far longer than intended.
If the frame met the engineering specification, why would quality send the frame back to the supplier? Actually, they couldn't even if they wanted to. Something called a contract. You can't expect AO Smith to eat the cost of a frame just because the welds don't look nice.
That's not how business works. Components that don't pass QC always have the option of being repaired. No one would be required to dispose of a questionable frame just because it was purchased through a sales order outlining general specifications. The fact is, GM's standards in this area weren't very high. That's why the A-arm detached on my '72 with less than 40K miles, and it's the reason many of these frames developed serious cracks with relatively little use. Whether this is acceptable in the bigger picture - including the purchase price of the vehicles - is a different matter.
That's not how business works. Components that don't pass QC always have the option of being repaired. No one would be required to dispose of a questionable frame just because it was purchased through a sales order outlining general specifications. The fact is, GM's standards in this area weren't very high......
That's basically what I was saying, the frames would have passed QC because of the low standards set by the company. Thus QC is not going to reject the frames.
Who do you think sets the specifications for QC? It's the design engineers job to tell QC what is acceptable. When a part doesn't meet the specifications handed down to QC by engineering (via the frames' engineering drawing), first thing QC will do before rejecting a part to the supplier is contact the design engineer for disposition of the component. It's the engineers responsibility to determine if a rework is acceptable or if the part is rejected. Design Engineering trumps QC in a factory environment.
Basically, low quality standards set by Design = QC accepting frames with less than perfect welds.
I agree the standards were not very high, but if the frame met this low standard, QC is not going to reject the frame. I am a design engineer and I know how industry works. I've personally have evaluated hundreds of parts that did not meet the specifications on the engineering drawing. It's one of the worst jobs that an engineer has to do, but it has to be done.
Last edited by Jason Staley; Dec 24, 2015 at 07:29 PM.
I bought my '72 vert in '95 with a supposed 130k on the clock, but it was an old show car from Maryland, south of DC...called southern Md.....
so it sat in the garage a fair amount of time......
and I have never had the body/frame apart....I suspect they have never been apart, car was repainted by p/o and so it was white from factory, but when repainted the windshield was removed and everything done right.....doubt from shape of the body/frame bolts that they ever were separated....the #4 mounts behind/up high were rusted out some years ago, so replaced.....
From what I seen over some 20 years now, the frame is fine, knock on wood, and lemme tell you the car had been over some crap roads here locally, sabotaged by the local .gov....seriously, abject stupid.....
I bought my '72 vert in '95 with a supposed 130k on the clock, but it was an old show car from Maryland, south of DC...called southern Md.....
so it sat in the garage a fair amount of time......
and I have never had the body/frame apart....I suspect they have never been apart, car was repainted by p/o and so it was white from factory, but when repainted the windshield was removed and everything done right.....doubt from shape of the body/frame bolts that they ever were separated....the #4 mounts behind/up high were rusted out some years ago, so replaced.....
From what I seen over some 20 years now, the frame is fine, knock on wood, and lemme tell you the car had been over some crap roads here locally, sabotaged by the local .gov....seriously, abject stupid.....
but the car handles well, and hangs in there
Do you worry about the condition of the birdcage? I bought my '82 at a good price recently, and I was planning to throw another $3000-4000 into it for mechanical updates and performance. Now I've discovered the birdcage issue. I'm having serious doubts about spending more on the car, and even wondering if I should keep it unless I can confirm that the cage is in reasonably good condition. I removed some of the interior trim today, but that didn't tell me much. There is some evidence of water incursion, and the carpets have been wet in the past. I'm thinking I need to pay a shop to dig deeper and inspect this before I spend too much.
I have a 66 El Camino SS and while they are not show quality welds by any means they are a head and shoulders above my 73 Corvette. The El Camino welds are typical production line welds but the Corvette welds are just pathetic.
It is interesting comparing the welds on my 72 frame to the welds on my Factory Five Cobra frame. I know one is mass produced and the other is a little more quality controlled but the difference is huge. Now I'm not a welder by trade but I deal in The steel and fabrication industry so I have seen quite a few welds. The 72 welds looks like they were hit and miss, like they were trying to conserve welding wire. The FF welds are almost overdone if that is possible. As long as it met the specs that is all that was required. I'm sure every Vette that was raced either broke the frame or was welded up properly. Other than that it was just another street car.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.