Techie question...383 PERFORMANCE engines





Dep
I figure he is trapping about 6700-6800, easy, with no-problems at all.





These are the pistons to a friends off road only, road racing 383 ci. I think these JE popups were 12.8 or so compression with 64 cc heads. This motor uses an 8000 rpm red line. Every year that it has been raced it's never had a failure. Same crank, rods, and pistons. It just gets new ring, bearings, and mod's every year to make it work better.
second picture off to the right.
Last edited by gkull; Mar 28, 2005 at 11:31 AM.
Why do you ask?





I wonder if anyone is running 377CI engines any more (destroked 400)?
I guess they fell out of favor when the 383 became popular.
Anyways, thanks for the excellent responses.
Dep


I wonder if anyone is running 377CI engines any more (destroked 400)?
I guess they fell out of favor when the 383 became popular.
Anyways, thanks for the excellent responses.
Dep
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/66278/index.html






I'm thinking racing fuel on anything above 10.5-1. Are you still using the stock rear end and stick or auto?
Fevre: Yep...saw that website. But I am looking more for info on full blast strip-only 383s or 377s. Actually, the 377 was used in the Cheetah cars.

Dep
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





The only limitations on motors these days is air flow and will the valve train hold together. Once you get into good bottom end parts the old idea of feet per minute of the pistons doesn't really come into play on sub 8000 rpm motors with sub 3.800 or less stroker cranks.
Anybody that has to use anything above 92 octane in 11:1 or less CR motors has not done their homework
The other thing if your going to run race gas why stop at 12.5 CR Why not go ahead and just build 15:1 or 17 to 1 with methanol





The only limitations on motors these days is air flow and will the valve train hold together. Once you get into good bottom end parts the old idea of feet per minute of the pistons doesn't really come into play on sub 8000 rpm motors with sub 3.800 or less stroker cranks.
Anybody that has to use anything above 92 octane in 11:1 or less CR motors has not done their homework
The other thing if your going to run race gas why stop at 12.5 CR Why not go ahead and just build 15:1 or 17 to 1 with methanol
I'm not worried about pump gas as I plan on racing fuel no matter what engine I use. I haven't seen engines UNDER 11-1 compression being used in any serious competition (NHRA and NASCAR). 13.5-1 is about the limit in practicality for compression ratio. I'm not running John Force's car you know
Considering NASCAR is using a 358 motor and getting over 700 HP, and Dave Strickler was getting 456@7700RPM out of a 302 (using STOCK valve train), I would hope that a substantial horsepower increase could be reached with a hotter 383 without going too exotic or breaking the bank.
Dep










Dep
Ci within a class range. Like 350 through 427 ci with all the same parts and compression. Would all make the same HP within a small %.
Like my 383 and 427 are very simular. MY 383 is a radical thurough bred compared to my TQ monster 427 small block.
Dep
As for 13.1 or more CR on 383s..that would be awesome, but I never see any for some reason. Most high CR motors that I have been around were Big Blocks.






You can get an amazing "bang-fer-yer-buck" with a mousemotor as compared to a big block. I still have the utmost respect for the 302 Z-28 engine and I have NOT ruled out going with that cubic inch for my engine choice. Consider...I can get a VERY nice SET of smallblock complete heads for what I pay for ONE big block head. I can almost stroll down the street and pick up smallblock parts laying around

I can buy a COMPLETE smallblock for what they are selling a short block big block for.
Don't get me wrong...I still think the ratmotor is the ULTIMATE in performance for the Chevy line. No amount of boring and stroking can turn a mousemotor into a ratmotor equal. But if I drop in a killer big block into my Vette (and I wouldn't even bother with any of the mild crate ratmotors Chevy offers), I have no doubt that the rear end and u-joints will immediately become shrapnel. I'm not running an auto, and when I come off the line, it will be slipping my foot off the clutch. I have ZERO confidence that the Vette drivetrain can take a lot of those type of launches with the power and torque a big block puts out. A smallblock offers a much better chance of the rear end surviving. Until someone comes up with an inexpensive way of installing a Ford rear end in a Vette without back halfing the car and cutting the crap out of things, I think I'll be stuck squeaking with a mouse

Dep
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/66278/index.html
When they finaly get done blathering, you have a build up, using their numbers, of $5300 for 380 HP and 474 ft. lbs. of torque.
Mine ain't done and running yet, but I have less than $3700 in the engine alone, and, according to DD, 387 HP and 435 ft. lbs of torque. My dollar figure is based upon the cost of new parts vs the used parts I am taking from my 350. Their big bump is a roller cam, my numbers are for a flat tappet.
No wonder people are starting to say WTF is with the magazines? I have receipts for all my parts, if anyone is interested. No secret on how to get performance on a budget, just don't listen to the mags.
Hey, I am not proud, if anyone wants to know what I did and how I did it, E-Mail me. Don't forget, my numbers came from DD. Will chassis dyno this spring when everything is together.



http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sum...%20engine.html






http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sum...%20engine.html
Dep









