When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
motor:
350ci
10.25:1 compression
XE268 cam
Roller tip rockers
Sportsman II heads (200cc, 2.02")
PRM Intake (I might switch to a single plane)
750cfm speed demon (runs rich with current set up)
1 5/8" headers and 2.5" flowmasters
I run the Comp XS282s in the 355 in my Z28- pics in my photo album if you're interested. I don't know how the flow numbers for your Sportsmans compare to the AFR 195s that I have but my comp ratio is pretty close to yours at 11:1. With that cam the idle is fairly nasty but throttle response is good, with very strong mid range & top end power.
My combo should be comfortably around 450+ HP according to everybody I talked to before deciding on that cam. I'd go with a split pattern cam with your heads and I'd stick with the dual plane intake. I run a Weiand Steath intake w/ a 1/2" phenolic spacer. If you want to give up a little peak HP and play it safe in terms of street usable torque the XS274s looks pretty good. Either way you should hit your goal of 400+ HP.
While others may argue, I'm not even-sure you really need a solid-lifter cam to achieve 400-425 HP.
I have a 355 CID SBC in my '79 Z28 that weighs-in at 3700+ pounds at the strip:
it is 10.3:1 CR, uses 1989 iron DART heads (2.020"/1.600"/64cc), Victor Jr. intake, 750 double-pump Holley, and has an 'old-technology' CC 292H cam.
With a THM400, 10" converter, and street tires, it has run 13.60s @ 105 thru the pipes, which is (maybe???) quicker and faster than the lighter 1970 370/360 HP LT-1 Z28s or Corvettes.
Les- That sounds like an awesome combo you have there. I think those AFR 195 are alot better then the sportsmans.
Motorhead- did you use the 282S or The SX282S? I think the 282S is a single pattern a step below the 294S. How was the torque and what gears did you run with it?
Les- That sounds like an awesome combo you have there. I think those AFR 195 are alot better then the sportsmans.
Motorhead- did you use the 282S or The SX282S? I think the 282S is a single pattern a step below the 294S. How was the torque and what gears did you run with it?
I just always thought that solid cams made more power then hyd. flat tappet. Since I'm going to replace the cam and lifters I figured why not go Solid.
Are there any disadvantages of running solid v. hyd lifters?
L82kid, Im putting together a 350 with edelbrock rpm heads ( I had laying around, not my first pick) and am gonna use the xs282 with a victor jr, 750 holley. I should have it together in a few weeks, I will let you know how it runs. Its going in a 71 c3 4spd with 411's.
Les- That sounds like an awesome combo you have there. I think those AFR 195 are alot better then the sportsmans.
Motorhead- did you use the 282S or The SX282S? I think the 282S is a single pattern a step below the 294S. How was the torque and what gears did you run with it?
Thanks. Once I got the valves relashed & the timing set up right I found that it'd blow the tires away from a roll in 1st & all the way through 2nd. I bought some 17" AR TT2s with the painted spokes & put a set of Kuhmo Ecsta MX tires- got my traction back.
The only downside to solid lifters is adjusting the valves from time to time- not a big deal though. Like Bob said, the lifters with the oiling holes are a good idea. I got mine from Crower.
I have a couple of short vids if you want to hear it running. They were taken before timing & valve lash were dialed in but you can still get a pretty good idea. I'll email them to you if you're interested.
Thanks Les, I just got the vids and they worked without a problem. Your car looks and sounds great. Thats sick how the tires break loose from a rolling start.
I just always thought that solid cams made more power then hyd. flat tappet. Since I'm going to replace the cam and lifters I figured why not go Solid.
Are there any disadvantages of running solid v. hyd lifters?
There are no 'disadvantages' to running a solid-lifter camshaft, other than occasionally adjusting valve-lash, and they usually DO make more power:
when my Z28 was built, with the intention of racing weekly at the local strip, I had no truck or trailer, and I had to run on street-tires, so I figured a hydraulic cam wouldn't be destructive on the drive-train or spin the tires.
When I finally did get a tow vehicle and trailer, the car was deadly consistent, even more-so with slicks and an 8" converter, so I decided against changing the motor:
it currently runs 12-eighties at 105 MPH.
Last edited by Glensgages; May 6, 2005 at 05:04 AM.
Thank you!
Hell, when we began, I was just hoping for consistency and durability.
The 'power-to-weight' calculations, based on MPH, show approx 290 RWHP, while numbers based-on ET (much-less accurate) say approx 345 RWHP:
either-way, the numbers are-what-they-are, and these figures might help-out anybody pondering this choice of cam-styles.
I am running a 292S in my 350 motor. It has around 10 to 1 compression. AFR 190 heads and the stock LT1 intake. I have run a best of 12.7 at 110. I feel there is a little more in my combo. I should be able to run mid 12s. This is all on street tires. It has a pretty hairy idle and will pull to 7000 rpm so your short block should be able to take it. I have thought about changing it but every time I drive it I change my mind. Next cam would be a roller.