When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Would a stock or close to stock 1981 350 fitted with a Turbo - and any necessary helping aids, eg cam, headers, or cat in the trashcan,
run with or better a hopped up 383 ??????
And if they are close, who's gonna get the gas milage cup ??
The 383 would still have the advantage simply because the bottom end of the 350 can't take too much power unless it is built for it. That said, the turbo motor is going to be much easier to live with on the street and will get better gas mileage. Depending on how it is built it can be a much more refined power plant.
I disagree, the SBC can take quite a beating, what it can't take is revs..and like any engine detonation.
I guess this is directed at me. My point is that I do not believe an '81 350 is built to the same strength standards as a 1970 LT-1. If you tried to boost it up to match a well built 383 bad things could happen. Don't get me wrong, I would take the turbo 350 over the 383 any day. One of these days my '70 big block will have turbos on it.
The down side of turbo's is that they need time to spool up, so they are great for horsepower but don't do much for low end torque. The benefit you get from a 383 is the stroke, even more then cubic inchs. Think of crankshaft throw as a lever, the longer the lever the greater the torque. That is why the LS1 is such a torquey motor,even though it has less cubic inches (346 vs 350) it has a smaller bore diameter and a longer stroke. A 383 gives you a torque advatage through out it's operating range. Try running a Dyno Sim on a 327,350 & 377, all have the same bore diameter but different strokes (3.25, 3.48, 3.75) built the same way they will all put out just about the same HP +/- 5, but then look look at the torque,substantial.
By the time you bought a new crank (81 is cast and will crack if you boost that motor) then you might as well get a 383 stroker kit. Every turbo/supercharger book I have talks about using a forged crank and forged pistons. You would also probably want some Aluminium heads to help with the detonation/heat problem.
How about a 383 turbo? Now all you have to worry about is shredding tires, breaking driveshafts, gearboxes and half shafts.
The new turbos have less of the turbo lag problems. To quote Gale Banks "We don't have lag issues anymore, we have tire issues." It's all in how you want to run it. Fast is fast whether you have forced induction or naturally aspirated engines. The nice thing about a turbo for me is it makes up for the "bad air" that we have here in utah. A naturally aspirated engine is more susceptible to altitude and air pressure. An intercooled turbo-charged engine will have the capacity to keep the intake pressure the same thus making the engine consistently strong even at high altitudes.