When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I recently replaced the thermostat housing seal on my newly acquired '79 and was kinda surpised that no thermostat was installed. The heater is not in line (ie manifold ports are plugged)...is this normal? Will adding a thermostat cause any problems? I can't imagine it would...
Wuttin, some people remove the thermostat under the theory that it allows more water flow, resulting in cooler operating temps. There is another camp, however, that feels that removing the thermostat allows the water to flow too quickly through the radiator, and doesn't allow the radiator to properly cool it as it passes through. Personally, I've never noticed much of a difference (except in winter).
No thermostat will not allow the water to remain in the radiator long enough to cool off. The idea of a stat is to hold water in the rad until it cools to a certain temp, then open it to allow cooler water into the engine to cool it off.
No thermostat will not allow the water to remain in the radiator long enough to cool off. The idea of a stat is to hold water in the rad until it cools to a certain temp, then open it to allow cooler water into the engine to cool it off.
Have any of you guys ever really tested this?? Or are you just going by what others say???
I have.. I spend alot of time running with and without a thermostat. Every day I took the car out and I changed the thermostat. Either in or out but it never ran the way it ran the day before.
I also monitored head temperature in BOTH heads.
I found with a thermostat I needed ONE fan on at all times and the motor ran about 195 with a 165 themostat.
Without any themostat in I didn't need ANY fan on the open road and the motor stabalized at 185-188.
I also found that after driving and shutting down for 5 minutes like in a gas stop the heads equlized temperature faster with NO thermostat.
Take all the theories you want but until you have tested them yourself you don't really know what works best for you.
That said I would not run my dailly driver without a thermostat but my corvette will NOT run a thermostat.
Have any of you guys ever really tested this?? Or are you just going by what others say???
I have.. I spend alot of time running with and without a thermostat. Every day I took the car out and I changed the thermostat. Either in or out but it never ran the way it ran the day before.
I also monitored head temperature in BOTH heads.
I found with a thermostat I needed ONE fan on at all times and the motor ran about 195 with a 165 themostat.
Without any themostat in I didn't need ANY fan on the open road and the motor stabalized at 185-188.
I also found that after driving and shutting down for 5 minutes like in a gas stop the heads equlized temperature faster with NO thermostat.
Take all the theories you want but until you have tested them yourself you don't really know what works best for you.
That said I would not run my dailly driver without a thermostat but my corvette will NOT run a thermostat.
I think the discussion of whether or not you should run a thermostat is almost funny. Do you really think GM would spend the time and money to engineer a car with parts (thermostat and related) that are optional? The engine is designed to run at a specified temperature. That temperature is controlled by the combination of the water pump, thermostat, radiator, and the tune-up specs of the engine. If GM could save 10 cents on any part, they would. Why re-engineer what GM already did?
Get your service manual out, find out the correct thermostat (I would guess 180-190), install it and tune up your car. If your car is overheating or just plain running warm then you have a cooling related issue that has been discussed here many times - blocked/clogged or just plain old radiator, failing water pump, thermostat issues, timing issues, etc. GM designed and ran big blocks with a/c and other special high performance engines for many years.
I think the discussion of whether or not you should run a thermostat is almost funny. Do you really think GM would spend the time and money to engineer a car with parts (thermostat and related) that are optional? The engine is designed to run at a specified temperature. That temperature is controlled by the combination of the water pump, thermostat, radiator, and the tune-up specs of the engine. If GM could save 10 cents on any part, they would. Why re-engineer what GM already did?
Get your service manual out, find out the correct thermostat (I would guess 180-190), install it and tune up your car. If your car is overheating or just plain running warm then you have a cooling related issue that has been discussed here many times - blocked/clogged or just plain old radiator, failing water pump, thermostat issues, timing issues, etc. GM designed and ran big blocks with a/c and other special high performance engines for many years.
Thermostats are needed to warm the car up properly in cold weather. For a high performance car running only in the warm weather it is not needed. Also the safely factor of a thermostat sticking and they do stick makes it too risky.
Over heating is not a problem, getting to a proper working temp of about 185 is not a problem. Weather I need a fan or not tells me which is more efficient at cooling the engine.
Mine runs more efficient without a thermostat. GM or a service manual can say all they want. Some of us think outside what is good for the average person/car.
Thermostats are needed to warm the car up properly in cold weather. For a high performance car running only in the warm weather WITH ELECTRIC FANS ON A TEMPERATURE SWITCH it is SOMETIMES not needed. Also the safely factor of a thermostat sticking and they do stick makes it too risky.
Over heating is not a problem, getting to a proper working temp of about 185 is not a problem. Weather I need a fan or not tells me which is more efficient at cooling the engine.
Mine runs more efficient without a thermostat. GM or a service manual can say all they want. Some of us think outside what is good for the average person/car.
i added to your statement
your managing your engine temp with electric fans. therefore your thermostat is a thermo-switch or a switch in your dash. if you had a mechanical fan your car would suck without a thermostat. so really there is just mis-comunication going on in this thread.
so really were discussing managing temps with a thermostat and mechanical fan vs. thermostat and electric fans. vs. just electric fans.
i think we all agree an engines temp needs management to remain constant. its just a matter of how we manage it.
The Thermostat is there to help the engine warm up quickly. It will also regulate the lower end of the temperature range once it gets to operating temperature.
They are not mandatory just like many parts on your car but it helps drivabillity and theoreticaly helps durabillity because of the faster warm up. I have run with them or without them but I prefer to run with them.
I'll chime in and say one of the most important functions of the thermostat is to warm up the engine as quickly as possible. This is not only good for emissions, but you will burn off the nasty stuff in the oil quicker...
i dont run one. the reason being is because if it wear to fail im running at 6000 rpms for like an hour or 1 and if it over heats that ruins the whole day so its easier just to leave it out.
I think that big blocks and small blocks pumping big horsepower will warm up pretty fast, with or without a thermostat. Horsepower creates a lot of heat. For stock small blocks a high flow thermostat would heat the engine fast enough and provide adequate temperatures. However, controlling temperatures using a thermostat or with electric fans is basically doing the same thing. Warm up times vary depending on how cold or warm it is outside, so the time varies no matter what. Constant temperatures after warmup is important but either way the temps are going to be fairly constant. I can't see dependability or durability sacrificed either way. Just my thoughts on it all.
Bernie
i dont run one. the reason being is because if it wear to fail im running at 6000 rpms for like an hour or 1 and if it over heats that ruins the whole day so its easier just to leave it out.
basically i cant type. what i meant is i dont wanan take the risk of over heating while racing( since all i do is race my car)did that clear it up. after reading what i said above i dont even know what i meant
basically i cant type. what i meant is i dont wanan take the risk of over heating while racing( since all i do is race my car)did that clear it up. after reading what i said above i dont even know what i meant
then invest in a failsafe type. if it fails, it fails to the open position...
Thought I would jump in here. It is true that a car will run cooler without a thermostat. I did it with my 61 Merc in high school because it was overheating and I had no money. So its a fact, however personally I would never recommend this to anyone. An old GM mechanic told me years ago that it not only increase emissions, but causes excessive wear if not operating at a certain temperature. While I can't prove the excessive wear and I'm not an engineer, I do believe thermostats play a critical role in your vehicle operation.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.