When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't know much about 283's except I guess its a casting from 1964. Also I would think it a bit odd to have this engine in a 75 Corvette. Guy wants $2k for it. I know his son and thats how I heard about it. Just curious what the forum thinks.
Block casting code 3834810
1. TRW 11.5 FORGED STANDARD PISTONS
2. MOLY RINGS SEALED POWER
3. ARP ROD BOLTS
4. 10/10 STEEL SMALL JOURNAL CRANK
5. NOS 8 INCH FACTORY BALANCER
6. CLEVITE BEARINGS
7. MELLINGS HV PUMP, PICK UP. AND SCREEN
8. MOROSO OIL PUMP SHAFT
9. ARP HOLD DOWN BOLT
10.CLOYES 2X ROLLER CHAIN
Heads Casting code 3890462
Fuelie heads fresh with steel 2.02 and 1.65 valves, screw in 3/8" studs
1.5 Scorpion Roller Rockers
Cam - Doug Herbert CC5B
Duration Int. 284 at .050 246
Exh. 287 at .050 247
Lift Int. 498 Exh. 500
Lobe Sep. 108 degrees
Valve Lash = 25
You sure it's not a real 327?...A 283 with a 327 crank yields 307 C.I. (Different bore diameter). Also, it sometimes takes alot of grinding to fit a 327 crank into a 283 block....unless it is a 1962 block.
again, the type of material has little or no effect in this area. i have read tech articles that state iron heads HELP with this problem.
Cast iron holds in a lot of heat and thus runs hotter on the surface in the combustion chambers. Aluminum wicks this heat away from the surface of the combustion chamber to the water jackets something like 4 times faster than iron. Aluminum heads run cooler and allow the running of higher compression.
yea that is the common falshood that everyone is feed. just like batteries on concrete. the only true advantages with aluminum heads are weight savings and bragging
I was taught that I had to run about 1 point higher with aluminum to compensate for the heat (Power) lost by not having the thermal storage capabilities of cast iron....Hmmmm
again, the type of material has little or no effect in this area. i have read tech articles that state iron heads HELP with this problem.
So why did GM drop compression of the engines if high compression cast iron can run on the lower octane pump gas? I'm not trying to needle you, I'm just trying to get some evidence to prove this to myself.
To meet emissions requirements for the equipment they had at that time as cheaply as they could.
Both L-48 and L-82 engines meet emission standards...L-82 engines have at least 1/2 point higher compression...Many of us on the forum have 10.5 to 11.0 in our street vettes using aluminum heads..
This sound odd. If I remember correctly you would have to bore the 283 .125" to get to a 327 bore. The old blocks were thick, but that's really pushing it. Even if it works, you could not bore that block any further.
Why would you want a low nickel block with small cubic inches and no further rebuilds, when you could get a newer high nickel block (wears much longer) with more cubes?
Are you getting just the engine or the whole car? If the price includes the car, it might be a good deal. However, if you are buying the engine only, and it is not a valuable block for some other reason, I think I would get some other engine.
I cannot find that engine casting number on this list:
A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.
You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.
You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
You pretty much remember your stuff. But, again, you get into crank and rod journal problems when you fail to take into account the large and small journal stuff. For instance: Only way to make a 302 using a 327 block and 283 crank is to get a small journal 327 block. But the real DZ 302 didn't use a 283 crank to make this displacement, just in case this comes up. There is no way to make a 302 out of a 350 block using factory parts since there were no small-journal 350 blocks or large-journal 283 cranks. The math works out right but there are no factory parts to do this.
You pretty much remember your stuff. But, again, you get into crank and rod journal problems when you fail to take into account the large and small journal stuff. For instance: Only way to make a 302 using a 327 block and 283 crank is to get a small journal 327 block. But the real DZ 302 didn't use a 283 crank to make this displacement, just in case this comes up. There is no way to make a 302 out of a 350 block using factory parts since there were no small-journal 350 blocks or large-journal 283 cranks. The math works out right but there are no factory parts to do this.
Why would a 302 block be different? The '67 302 rods were small journals, '68 and '69 were large journal. The main journals are the same. The bore is 4.00 in.. The 302 and 283 share the same 3.00 stroke.
Why would a 302 block be different? The '67 302 rods were small journals, '68 and '69 were large journal. The main journals are the same. The bore is 4.00 in.. The 302 and 283 share the same 3.00 stroke.
Real DZ 302 cranks are not the same as the garden variety 283 cranks. Yes they do share the same stroke. 283 cranks are all small journal and come in both forged, then cast for the '67 run, but still all small journals. The crank counterweights are different between 302 and 283 cranks and so is the flywheel flange. The only way to make a 350 block into a 302 is with a large journal 302 crank which, as you point out, only existed in 68 and 69 and aren't exactly falling off shelves around the country. So, in that regard, you are right that you can make a 302 from a 350 block using the later big journal 302 crank but, again, it can't be done with a 283 crank since there were no small journal 350 blocks or big journal 283 cranks.
To meet emissions requirements for the equipment they had at that time as cheaply as they could.
One needs to remember that tetraethyl lead served two purposes: Lubricating the seats, and it was a natural octane booster. By removing the lead from gasoline, the octane dropped, and it became necessary to lower compression to prevent detonation.
Kinda makes those who just go out and buy a motor and stick it in over a couple of beers with a few friends seem simple. The only math I need to know is 12 empty beers means 12 more needed = pass another wrench thingy.
Good debate guys, keep it going.
yea that is the common falshood that everyone is feed. just like batteries on concrete. the only true advantages with aluminum heads are weight savings and bragging
Well, to each his own. There are people on this forum that have done the iron to aluminum swap and had the rattling under load go away even though they gained three quarters of a point in compression and didn't retard the timing advance. Of course I'm just going by what they wrote.
Kinda makes those who just go out and buy a motor and stick it in over a couple of beers with a few friends seem simple.
Either you got fast working friends or slow drinkers.
As far as iron vs alum heads. Alum heads not only tolerate more compression, but need more compression to make the same power as iron. Benefit of alum is the weight savings, easier porting, and perhaps advanced design (mainly due to high hp applications).
A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.
You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
A 283 block and 327 crank make a 307. The 283 and 307 pistons are not the same. The wrist pin is set higher in the 307 because of the longer stroke crankshaft. If you used a 307 piston in a 283 it would have about 5/1 compression.