C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine Option, unusual to me

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #1  
flood's Avatar
flood
Thread Starter
Race Director
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 10,896
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default Engine Option, unusual to me

A stroked 283. Stroked to 327.

I don't know much about 283's except I guess its a casting from 1964. Also I would think it a bit odd to have this engine in a 75 Corvette. Guy wants $2k for it. I know his son and thats how I heard about it. Just curious what the forum thinks.

Block casting code 3834810
1. TRW 11.5 FORGED STANDARD PISTONS
2. MOLY RINGS SEALED POWER
3. ARP ROD BOLTS
4. 10/10 STEEL SMALL JOURNAL CRANK
5. NOS 8 INCH FACTORY BALANCER
6. CLEVITE BEARINGS
7. MELLINGS HV PUMP, PICK UP. AND SCREEN
8. MOROSO OIL PUMP SHAFT
9. ARP HOLD DOWN BOLT
10.CLOYES 2X ROLLER CHAIN

Heads Casting code 3890462
Fuelie heads fresh with steel 2.02 and 1.65 valves, screw in 3/8" studs
1.5 Scorpion Roller Rockers
Cam - Doug Herbert CC5B
Duration Int. 284 at .050 246
Exh. 287 at .050 247
Lift Int. 498 Exh. 500
Lobe Sep. 108 degrees
Valve Lash = 25

Mallory Distributor # 2548201H (gap= .022")
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #2  
Entropy's Avatar
Entropy
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32,519
Likes: 1
From: central America
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

An iron headed car with 11.5 CR...I think you might have trouble with detonation, even on 93 gas. Can you get good gas for it?

trw
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
big_G's Avatar
big_G
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 4
From: Austin Texas
Default

You sure it's not a real 327?...A 283 with a 327 crank yields 307 C.I. (Different bore diameter). Also, it sometimes takes alot of grinding to fit a 327 crank into a 283 block....unless it is a 1962 block.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #4  
redc3's Avatar
redc3
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
From: pr, frederick md.
Default

Originally Posted by 72 stingray owner
An iron headed car with 11.5 CR...I think you might have trouble with detonation, even on 93 gas. Can you get good gas for it?

trw
again, the type of material has little or no effect in this area. i have read tech articles that state iron heads HELP with this problem.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 12:55 PM
  #5  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by redc3
again, the type of material has little or no effect in this area. i have read tech articles that state iron heads HELP with this problem.
Cast iron holds in a lot of heat and thus runs hotter on the surface in the combustion chambers. Aluminum wicks this heat away from the surface of the combustion chamber to the water jackets something like 4 times faster than iron. Aluminum heads run cooler and allow the running of higher compression.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
redc3's Avatar
redc3
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,161
Likes: 0
From: pr, frederick md.
Default

yea that is the common falshood that everyone is feed. just like batteries on concrete. the only true advantages with aluminum heads are weight savings and bragging
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #7  
big_G's Avatar
big_G
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 4
From: Austin Texas
Default

I was taught that I had to run about 1 point higher with aluminum to compensate for the heat (Power) lost by not having the thermal storage capabilities of cast iron....Hmmmm
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #8  
Entropy's Avatar
Entropy
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32,519
Likes: 1
From: central America
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by redc3
again, the type of material has little or no effect in this area. i have read tech articles that state iron heads HELP with this problem.
So why did GM drop compression of the engines if high compression cast iron can run on the lower octane pump gas? I'm not trying to needle you, I'm just trying to get some evidence to prove this to myself.

trw
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:00 PM
  #9  
Easy Mike's Avatar
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 38,923
Likes: 1,482
From: Southbound
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by 72 stingray owner
So why did GM drop compression of the engines if high compression cast iron can run on the lower octane pump gas?....trw
To meet emissions requirements for the equipment they had at that time as cheaply as they could.

Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #10  
big_G's Avatar
big_G
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 4
From: Austin Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Easy Mike
To meet emissions requirements for the equipment they had at that time as cheaply as they could.


Both L-48 and L-82 engines meet emission standards...L-82 engines have at least 1/2 point higher compression...Many of us on the forum have 10.5 to 11.0 in our street vettes using aluminum heads..
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #11  
NeverFinished's Avatar
NeverFinished
Advanced
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default

This sound odd. If I remember correctly you would have to bore the 283 .125" to get to a 327 bore. The old blocks were thick, but that's really pushing it. Even if it works, you could not bore that block any further.

Why would you want a low nickel block with small cubic inches and no further rebuilds, when you could get a newer high nickel block (wears much longer) with more cubes?

Are you getting just the engine or the whole car? If the price includes the car, it might be a good deal. However, if you are buying the engine only, and it is not a valuable block for some other reason, I think I would get some other engine.

I cannot find that engine casting number on this list:

www.nastyz28.com/sbcmenu.html
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #12  
holley505's Avatar
holley505
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 7
From: Longwood Florida
Default

A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.

You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #13  
gerry72's Avatar
gerry72
Safety Car
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 43
From: San Antonio TX
Default

Originally Posted by holley505
A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.

You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
You pretty much remember your stuff. But, again, you get into crank and rod journal problems when you fail to take into account the large and small journal stuff. For instance: Only way to make a 302 using a 327 block and 283 crank is to get a small journal 327 block. But the real DZ 302 didn't use a 283 crank to make this displacement, just in case this comes up. There is no way to make a 302 out of a 350 block using factory parts since there were no small-journal 350 blocks or large-journal 283 cranks. The math works out right but there are no factory parts to do this.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
big_G's Avatar
big_G
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 4
From: Austin Texas
Default

Originally Posted by gerry72
You pretty much remember your stuff. But, again, you get into crank and rod journal problems when you fail to take into account the large and small journal stuff. For instance: Only way to make a 302 using a 327 block and 283 crank is to get a small journal 327 block. But the real DZ 302 didn't use a 283 crank to make this displacement, just in case this comes up. There is no way to make a 302 out of a 350 block using factory parts since there were no small-journal 350 blocks or large-journal 283 cranks. The math works out right but there are no factory parts to do this.
Why would a 302 block be different? The '67 302 rods were small journals, '68 and '69 were large journal. The main journals are the same. The bore is 4.00 in.. The 302 and 283 share the same 3.00 stroke.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #15  
gerry72's Avatar
gerry72
Safety Car
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 43
From: San Antonio TX
Default

Originally Posted by big_G
Why would a 302 block be different? The '67 302 rods were small journals, '68 and '69 were large journal. The main journals are the same. The bore is 4.00 in.. The 302 and 283 share the same 3.00 stroke.
Real DZ 302 cranks are not the same as the garden variety 283 cranks. Yes they do share the same stroke. 283 cranks are all small journal and come in both forged, then cast for the '67 run, but still all small journals. The crank counterweights are different between 302 and 283 cranks and so is the flywheel flange. The only way to make a 350 block into a 302 is with a large journal 302 crank which, as you point out, only existed in 68 and 69 and aren't exactly falling off shelves around the country. So, in that regard, you are right that you can make a 302 from a 350 block using the later big journal 302 crank but, again, it can't be done with a 283 crank since there were no small journal 350 blocks or big journal 283 cranks.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #16  
Entropy's Avatar
Entropy
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 32,519
Likes: 1
From: central America
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by Easy Mike
To meet emissions requirements for the equipment they had at that time as cheaply as they could.

One needs to remember that tetraethyl lead served two purposes: Lubricating the seats, and it was a natural octane booster. By removing the lead from gasoline, the octane dropped, and it became necessary to lower compression to prevent detonation.

http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/leadtet/leadh.htm

The above link explains the chemistry.

<now donning flame suit>

trw
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #17  
Glass Act's Avatar
Glass Act
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,545
Likes: 3
From: 406ci SB, AFR 180 Heads - 490 HP @5,600 RPM 529 lb-ft @ 4,100 RPM
Default

Kinda makes those who just go out and buy a motor and stick it in over a couple of beers with a few friends seem simple. The only math I need to know is 12 empty beers means 12 more needed = pass another wrench thingy.
Good debate guys, keep it going.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Engine Option, unusual to me

Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #18  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by redc3
yea that is the common falshood that everyone is feed. just like batteries on concrete. the only true advantages with aluminum heads are weight savings and bragging
Well, to each his own. There are people on this forum that have done the iron to aluminum swap and had the rattling under load go away even though they gained three quarters of a point in compression and didn't retard the timing advance. Of course I'm just going by what they wrote.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #19  
mandm1200's Avatar
mandm1200
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 1
From: New Cumberland PA
Default

Originally Posted by Glass Act
Kinda makes those who just go out and buy a motor and stick it in over a couple of beers with a few friends seem simple.
Either you got fast working friends or slow drinkers.

As far as iron vs alum heads. Alum heads not only tolerate more compression, but need more compression to make the same power as iron. Benefit of alum is the weight savings, easier porting, and perhaps advanced design (mainly due to high hp applications).
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #20  
BigBlockk's Avatar
BigBlockk
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 1
From: North Bend Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by holley505
A little before my time... but the 350 and 327 and chevy 302 all use a 4 inch bore. The crank stroke is what changes the cubic inches. I am sure that big_G is right the 307 and 283 use the small piston.

You can make 302 with a 350/327 block and 283 crank I think? And 283 with a 327 crank makes a 327?? something like that!
A 283 block and 327 crank make a 307. The 283 and 307 pistons are not the same. The wrist pin is set higher in the 307 because of the longer stroke crankshaft. If you used a 307 piston in a 283 it would have about 5/1 compression.

BigBlockk

Later.....
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE