Undecided..

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 27, 2006 | 09:47 AM

Warhead

Thread Starter

Racer

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 330

Likes: 0

From: Lurkerville

Undecided..

I am currently rebuilding my L82. So far I am having the block bored .030, decked, line honed.. all the normal stuff. Plan on using Edelbrock Performer RPM heads (170cc runners, 2.02's and 64cc). Compression ratio should end up around 9.7:1 I believe. I am undecided on 2 things.
1. Fuel injection or N/A. Have been looking at Edelbrocks MPI systems, pricey as hell. Can save a few bucks going N/A. Is there any big benifit between FI and N/A?

2. Cam. Not too familiar with cam sizing, any help here welcome.

My desire is to "wake up" the engine and still have a very streetable ride. What are your thoughts?

Feb 27, 2006 | 09:50 AM

GDaina

Race Director

Joined: Feb 1999

Posts: 16,978

Likes: 7

From: In Dreams There Is Truth Ohio

F.I. will give you the best fuel economy and street manners.

Feb 27, 2006 | 11:56 AM

VintageMuscle

Advanced

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 72

Likes: 0

From: Canton Georgia

With 9.7 compression, I would select the XE262H-10 from comp cams. Part# 12-238-2. I'm interested to see what others would recommend. You may even get by on 89 octane with that cam, and not require premium fuel.

Feb 27, 2006 | 12:00 PM

Entropy

Team Owner

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 32,519

Likes: 1

From: central America

St. Jude Donor '08-'09

What's your budget?
If there isn't a limit, I'd suggest going with a roller cam and fuel injection. Both are used in modern engines with great results.
Do you have an automatic or a manual? That can make a big difference when picking a cam. Also need to know rear end ratio and what you'll be doing with the car.

Basically, we need more info.

trw

Feb 27, 2006 | 12:26 PM

BKbroiler

Le Mans Master

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 5,086

Likes: 787

From: Lebanon Township New Jersey

Quote:

Originally Posted by VintageMuscle

I have the Comp XE262 cam in my engine. Although it is a 383, that cam acts very mild in normal driving. Lots of low rpm power.

Feb 27, 2006 | 02:43 PM

Warhead

Thread Starter

Racer

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 330

Likes: 0

From: Lurkerville

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72 stingray owner

What's your budget?

trw

No real budget, would like to limit the total dollar amount as much as possable without sacrificing quality parts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72 stingray owner

Do you have an automatic or a manual? That can make a big difference when picking a cam. Also need to know rear end ratio and what you'll be doing with the car.

Basically, we need more info.

trw

Auto tranny, th350. Was also thinking about upgrade to a unit with an OD, perhaps a 4L60. Rear end ratio should be 3:55 but dont quate me on that.

Feb 27, 2006 | 07:55 PM

BigBlockk

Drifting

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 1,959

Likes: 1

From: North Bend Ohio

A hydraulic roller with about 280 degrees duration (220 @ '050" lift) and whatever lift the heads will allow. A set of headers and a well tuned Quadrajet.

With sharply tuned cruise metering this setup will rival FI in economy, better it in power and you won't have all that fuel curve crap. On top of all that you won't have to buy a $200 fuel pump and hook it up.

Just a lot simpler.

BigBlockk

Later.....

Feb 28, 2006 | 02:51 PM

spikezz4

Pro

Joined: Apr 2000

Posts: 625

Likes: 0

From: The Villages FL

FI or Carb

Besides the port injection systems, look at the Holley TBI unit. We have found it easy to work with and tune and very reliable once you have it dialed in. We have it on a 383 daily driver and it makes the Corvette a very nice driver. Fuel mileage will not be quite as good as port injection, but for lower initial cost and the simplicity it offers, it might be a viable choice. I personally prefer port injection, but I have been rather impressed with the TBI unit after 4 or 5 thousand miles.

Spike