When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am debating replacing the airgap/holley 750 with this Edelbrock dual quad set-up. The carb./intake came with the car when I traded for it last Summer. It is sitting on the shelf collecting dust. I either need to put it on this build or sell it. Anybody have opinions?? I know it would LOOK great but how will it perform on a 454 built roller engine street cruiser?? [IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
I would put it on even if it cost me a couple of HP it looks sooo I was contemplating put one of those on mine not long ago and would have if I had the setup sitting on a shelf
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Brent go for it!!!!
My first car was a '57 2 door Belair, with a 283 punched out to a 302 (actually a 301) Duntov 30-30 solid cam and "Dual Quads". Two Carters on an old Vette intake. Of all the cars I have had, this setup drew more attention when I cracked open the hood. Old school but still cool..
I tried a dual quad at first after the rebuild. I couldn't get it to run good and gave up. (although I'm sure part of the problem of getting it to run good was my inexperience) Replaced it with a RPM Air-Gap 2-R Intake and a Holley 850 "HO-Mod AED carb. Here is a pic of the dual quad setup.
Brent,
You can really get just as good a performance with a good dual plane high rise and a single 4 barrel. My Z-28 was a small block and an ultra high revver so got away with the Edelbrock TR1-Y tunnel ram. But that stuff is mostly show for the street.... good show,though
Best,
Greg
You have a lot of motor for that 750 Holley. GO FOR IT!! A guy with a built to the hilt 454 isn't to concerned about mileage, especially after I seen that nice duelly. Your used to puttin gas in em!!
Well 2th, those of us here in the oil patch vote for the twin 4 barrels too GPM vs. MPG. Though personally, I am looking for a TPI and 700R4 for my 71.
I'm not talking about MPG, but since ya all brung it up...teh MPG will suck an' to boot, teh Holley will run circles around the Quads...that's what I means 'bout efficient...the dual quad intake is no match for one of the newer single quad intakes.
Now if you run a forced induction or tunnel ram, that's a complete different ball game...
I would put it on even if it cost me a couple of HP it looks sooo I was contemplating put one of those on mine not long ago and would have if I had the setup sitting on a shelf
Looks So what if it cost a few HP, you got plenty. I think if it is properly jetted and tuned It will run with the Holley if not stronger! With the engine you have I think it can handle some extra carburation. I am building a 383 forged stroker for mine now and it's getting the tripower I got now. Had recomendations for 750 to 825 CFM on it. Might cost me some HP too but it's fast enough. Your probably not worried about 1/10 at the dragstrip, The look and the sound of the dual quads kicking in will be worth it.
He was. That was Merlin522's car. A lot of controversy on this forum. The car was sold a little while back at Barrett-Jackson. I don't think the engine ever got sorted out 100%.
Here's my 2 cents...I have a dual Edelbrock setup...but nothing (I'm finding out) under it to make it go (I will adress that in another thread)....YES, it looks very, VERY COOL ...but I am deciding on swapping for a single quad...MPG (GPM )?...it's a hog, the guys all smile at the pump when they see me coming..fast?...NO, at least not what I would expect anyway....but you sound like you have what it takes under the intake to make it work...for looks, you can't beat 'em...and when you open them both up, the sound is intoxicating...
Thanks for the input guys.I plan on getting the bugs out for a week or two and then trying the dual quad. If it stinks then off it comes. I am not worried about loosing a couple of HP though since this car will never see the track and should have more than enough to hold it's own with the local rustangs and ricers.
Brent... Obviously I'm biased in favor of the dual AFBs, since I bought them for that car, but you have to put them on!! There's nothing more awesome on a big torque motor than having 8 barrels of vacuum operated carb. It'll just keep on coming on from 2500 to 6000 RPM when you nail it. I had the same setup on a '62 Impala SS with a 409/425, (yes, it was a '65 motor). That thing was scary fast, even in a big Impala body.
The motor you're building is going to be an under-6000 RPM torquer, much like the old 409 was, and that's perfect for the "low efficiency" dual quads. The manifold doesn't flow all that well, but they're so big that it won't matter. The carbs are 600s, so you have 1200 cfm available!! If you get them set up right with the correct metering rods that Edelbrock has for dual quad operation, and then get them fine tuned by someone with experience, you won't regret it. You'll need the throttle solenoid for A/C operation, but Edelbrock sells them.
ANd then, there's the factor that others have mentioned. Lots of the guys with BBs at Pigeon Forge and other rod gatherings have them, and they definitely get the looks over the boring single Holley setups.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.