When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What if any advantage/disadvantage is there to running a solid roller cam besides the obvious need to occasionaly adjust the lash. I'm debating on using a retro roller cam instead of a solid flat tappet cam in a 383 build for my '67. Since it is going in a midyear, I would like to keep the sound of mechanical lifters and adjusting them a few times a year is no big deal for me.
Crane cams has solid street rollers with cast iron cam gear on them,
keeps you from having to buy an expensive dist. gear, they are the only cam company that goes to the trouble. If your engine will be running low RPM you
may want to go Hydraulic. I would run a solid street roller in a heartbeat but
thats just me. I trhink MOTORHEAD has went to a solid roller. have fun
Last edited by Little Mouse; May 27, 2006 at 02:29 AM.
You probably didn`t want to hear this or read. But personally, I think they are a waste of money and work for almost zero benefits except in a race car.
Actually Wally, I appreciate the honest feedback. Going to a roller setup is pretty spendy for the extra ponies one gets in return. I may just stay with a flat tappet and spend the money elsewhere.
Both of your opinions are sound. Rev kits, extra junk in the valley, and increased spring pressure to keep those tiny rollers on the cam profile are a few of the problems besides the constant up keep. I only use them in the race cars and they are continually torn down. Just put a good solid lifter cam in the 383 an enjoy the sucker instead of working on it. And a hydraulic anything would only defeat the purpose of the 383. And we know the purpose of that change
Last edited by Ironcross; May 27, 2006 at 03:24 AM.
If hydraulic rollers weren't an improvement over flat tappets, GM would save a bunch of manufacturing money and use flat tappet cams in their modern engines. The fact that they don't says a lot.
If hydraulic rollers weren't an improvement over flat tappets, GM would save a bunch of manufacturing money and use flat tappet cams in their modern engines. The fact that they don't says a lot.
The proven longevity and power of hyd. rollers says a lot, and there are plenty 500+ HP street reliable small blocks running around there.
The day you die it's best to have a "Zero" balance! I put 20,000 miles on my 383 with a solid roller before I had some bad luck. Without a doubt solid rollers in sub 7000 rpm motor could feasably last 50K miles. H-rollers are probably good for 100K
im new to this i just bought my first corvette im 35 i wish i would have bought one a whole lot sooner. my question is how do you fill the power steering fluid with the alt. bracket in the way , is there a different bracket that i can put on to make it easier. my vette is a 1978 25 ann.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
I would use a solid flat tappet over a hydraulic roller any day, equal or better performance and lower cost.
I use a Comp Cams solid street roller, it has reduced spring pressures and it is designed for the street with at cast distributor gear so you don't have to change that. I have over 10,000 trouble free miles on my 550 HP 406ci and I would not build another motor with anything but a solid roller cam in it
im new to this i just bought my first corvette im 35 i wish i would have bought one a whole lot sooner. my question is how do you fill the power steering fluid with the alt. bracket in the way , is there a different bracket that i can put on to make it easier. my vette is a 1978 25 ann.
Welcome to the forum.....GM didn't make it easy to reach the PS fluid on any C3 it seems.....I just use a funnel that extends into the reservoir and pour slowly.
MOTORHEAD, every mag I have looked at compairing hydraulic,
soild rollers, and this at less then 7000rpm ( street motor )
big block and small block the soild roller just eats the hydraulics
lunch. and compaired to a solid flat tappit there is no contest.
40 hp more. I see a radical crane street roller in my crystal ball
for me if I can get the lobe lift adjusted a little.
From: Pettis Performance 565 with two stages of Nitrous Supply nitrous 1.082, 4.61 at 155, 7.17 at 192
Originally Posted by Little Mouse
MOTORHEAD, every mag I have looked at compairing hydraulic,
soild rollers, and this at less then 7000rpm ( street motor )
big block and small block the soild roller just eats the hydraulics
lunch. and compaired to a solid flat tappit there is no contest.
40 hp more. I see a radical crane street roller in my crystal ball
for me if I can get the lobe lift adjusted a little.
With good heads they will make more power, no doubt. However unless you are willing to live with the risk of a lifter failure, they may not be worth it. I have to agree, unless you are trying to get every extra pony the motor can produce a solid flat tappet / hydraulic roller is the way to go.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by Little Mouse
MOTORHEAD, every mag I have looked at compairing hydraulic,
soild rollers, and this at less then 7000rpm ( street motor )
big block and small block the soild roller just eats the hydraulics
lunch. and compaired to a solid flat tappit there is no contest.
40 hp more. I see a radical crane street roller in my crystal ball
for me if I can get the lobe lift adjusted a little.
Not sure if you are agreeing with me or not ?
Anyway if you look at the lift at a certain duration for street cams the hydraulic roller and solid flat tappet are very similar and if I can the same performance out of a cam with 1/4 the price tag then I go with the solid flat tappet. No contest when comparing the solid roller to anything, it wins hands down.
Hey guys I just finished with my 454 engine rebuild....not having the experience I asked the tech. from jegs which cam I should use n he advised me to use comps XE268H....n after reading this thread n others I think I was wrongly advised...will I be ok or not.....I would appreciate your input...thanx....Jerrylee///
A 454 is a good sized engine If you have a 3 speed
automatic 3.08 rear you may like that cam. if its a 4 speed stick
I would have to have a little more duration, even if it only had the
308 rear, guess it comes down to what rpm range you want your car
to perform in, and how much hp you want. most people are not
interested in adjusting valves and if you can afford one I would go
with a Hydraulic roller, I would not even use a hydraulic flat tappit
in a pickup truck unless I had to money wise. For me I'm for a
solid anything for performance. Just my O2 have fun
Last edited by Little Mouse; May 27, 2006 at 08:33 PM.
thanx mouse...my tranny is auto with a overdrive my gears are the 3:08's...as 4 the rpm's....I don't think I will be going that high in the rpm range....when I had the guy build her I basically wanted a torque monster......something with a good burst off the line..........