When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a fuel pump that also has a -10 fitting on its inlet. However, since I'm using the stock sending unit on my '79, I didn't see the point in running -10 line. The diamater of the large sending unit tube is slightly smaller than the diameter of a -6 line. Being the novice mechanic that I am, I would assume that since the diameter of the tube from the sending unit is smaller than a -6 line, fuel won't flow any faster through a -10 line than it would through a -6 line.
So what I'm saying is you probably are going to need to upgrade your sending unit somehow so that the tube drawing from the tank is no smaller than a -10 line. I think I would install a -10 bulkhead into the tank and draw from that if I needed that much fuel.
Since I'm running a fairly average 465 hp 383, I didn't think I would need enough fuel to warrant running a -10 line. I ran -6 line and used a fitting to reduce the -10 fitting on the pump to a -6. Somebody please let me know if I'm completely wrong with my logic and I messed this up!
Braided fuel lines can leave your garage smelling like fuel. If that doesn't bother you, go for it.
Why would braided fuel lines make your garage smell like gas, as compared to steel lines with rubber lines from the tank? I cannot believe that they would leak gas, unless you did not put the connections on correctly.
Why would braided fuel lines make your garage smell like gas, as compared to steel lines with rubber lines from the tank? I cannot believe that they would leak gas, unless you did not put the connections on correctly.
Me too, besides gas would actually improve the smell of my garage/tent/corvette restoration center.
Victor, what brand hose did you use? how did you attach it to the sending unit? and did you run a return line?
If your hp requirements need a -10 line then you might as well put a bulkhead in the lowest part of the tank with a -10 fitting. You've got to be running a high power electric fuel pump or high perf mechanical pump with hp requirement like that so I see no point in running a -10 line if you initially have to squeeze the fuel out of a sending unit that smaller than -6. There would be no benefit of the -10 line then.
If -10 is needed then do -10 all around.
good luck guru
As a temporary solution (well, it's been like this for over a year) I installed a fuel resistant hose between the tank and the passenger side rocker panel. From there to the fuel pump is normal steel fuel line...
The rear section was rusted and leaked, that's why I (again: temporarily) installed a hose..... it's been there long enough, time to get the "real" fuel line installed.
Aren't these SS braided hoses made for fuel ? There's not even pressure on that line - only between the pump and the carb.
That's 5/8! Hell, your bathtub faucet only uses 1/2! You should be able to pump 15 gallons per minute through that at less than 50 psi. Unless you are running alcohol and pushing serious HP, -10 is just overkill to the extreme. The L88 and ZL1 engines managed to lumber along with 3/8 (-6) line at 6 psi.
Originally my '79 had a 2" piece of rubber tubing running from the tank to the fuel line so I'm not worried about the safety of the setup. It worked like that for 27 years without a problem.
My original plan was to cut off the nipple from the sending unit, install a 3/8" to -6 AN flared fitting. However, after cutting off the nipple from the sending unit, I discovered that there isn't enough room to slide the flared fitting back down the sending unit tube to use a flaring tool. So in the end, I had to buy a new sending unit.
3) The mechanical fuel pump that I'm going to be using doesn't have provisions to install a return line so I just left the return line tube on my sending unit open.
That's 5/8! Hell, your bathtub faucet only uses 1/2! You should be able to pump 15 gallons per minute through that at less than 50 psi. Unless you are running alcohol and pushing serious HP, -10 is just overkill to the extreme. The L88 and ZL1 engines managed to lumber along with 3/8 (-6) line at 6 psi.
I'm making around 600hp +/- and never miss a beat even at 6800rpms...
That's 5/8! Hell, your bathtub faucet only uses 1/2! You should be able to pump 15 gallons per minute through that at less than 50 psi. Unless you are running alcohol and pushing serious HP, -10 is just overkill to the extreme. The L88 and ZL1 engines managed to lumber along with 3/8 (-6) line at 6 psi.
-10 would really be pushing it. I ran -8 all the way from the tank to the engine and back through a return line. There were some places where it *just* fit. -10 would be a tight squeeze unless you didn't run the line in the stock locations. Here's how I ran mine...
By the way, there is absolutely no gas smell associated with my setup.
I've seen members squeeze -6 to carb and return line along passenger side frame? Can you squeeze -8 same way? I'd like to avoid running hose down pass side then back along driver.
Also, can you run -8 to carb and -6 return line? since you won't be returning as much fuel as you pump to the carb.
Last edited by 68 NJConv 454; Jun 21, 2006 at 11:40 AM.