When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK. I did the ride height/spindle angle measurement. Both are about 2 degrees in at the top at ride height which I estimated at 27" to the fender lip (so 13.5" from lip to spindle centerline). Now I'm puzzled by something else. At ride height, the rubber bump stops are just touching the frame. Is this right?
So, with everything assembled and the tires on, the bump stop is touching? Sounds like you would get suspension travel in one direction only. Shouldn't the control arms be more or less in the middle position between upper and lower limits?
I can't put the wheels on yet (give me another year)! However the spindle and arms are in the position they would be if the car were on the ground. You would think there would be some travel before hitting the bumpers.
I see something in that pic that I never noticed before, not even on a buddies car that has the same setup....the bumpstop is in a different position and not lined up with the dimple in the frame. You loose about 1/2 an inch of clearance (judging by the pic) because of that. I don't see why VB&P couldn't have left the bumpstop in the original position.
Yeah. They relocated the bumper from the original because the attachment for the spring is there now. Looks like I need a shorter bumper. Seems like I should have 2 inches of wheel travel before the bumper hits.
I can't put the wheels on yet (give me another year)! However the spindle and arms are in the position they would be if the car were on the ground. You would think there would be some travel before hitting the bumpers.
That does not look right to me. Not only is the lower bump stop touching the frame the lower control arm itself is almost touching the frame. The upper control arm looks to be on an upward angle as well. The hole in the top of the frame under the upper ball joint in the pic is for the upper bump stop. There is way too much distance between the stop and the underside of the upper arm. I understand your measurement but something is wrong with it. The suspension as seen in your pic has to be in a "compressed position", not "at rest". Stick the shock in. I bet you will see it is substantially compressed.
That does not look right to me. Not only is the lower bump stop touching the frame the lower control arm itself is almost touching the frame. The upper control arm looks to be on an upward angle as well. The hole in the top of the frame under the upper ball joint in the pic is for the upper bump stop. There is way too much distance between the stop and the underside of the upper arm. I understand your measurement but something is wrong with it. The suspension as seen in your pic has to be in a "compressed position", not "at rest". Stick the shock in. I bet you will see it is substantially compressed.
You are right. My calculation method is flawed. I recalculated with tire "squat" using my daily driver as a model. I was surprised to see that a properly inflated radial will squish 1.5 inches. I thought maybe an inch. So if I look at the bump stop with the spindle at 15 inches (instead of 13.5), I have some space in between the bumper and frame and the bottom arms are flat.
Offset ca shafts are nothing unique ... MOOG has been marketing them for years within their "problem solver" line. Same line of parts for many problem cars/trucks.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.