When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK....my 81 is all non emission, but I just found a two wire sensor on the exhaust system, driver side, just below the header connection, tip of sensor facing mostly rearward. Can someone comment on what type of sensor this is. I would assume I can remove at this point.
Thats what I thought....thanks. Odd they would want to just sense 1/2 the engine.....but if true dual system....guess it's that, or use and take the average of two sensors.
Thats what I thought....thanks. Odd they would want to just sense 1/2 the engine.....but if true dual system....guess it's that, or use and take the average of two sensors.
The computer was too primitive to know what to do with 2 sensors, basically. Plus, theoretically, it should read the same on both sides.
The computer was too primitive to know what to do with 2 sensors, basically. Plus, theoretically, it should read the same on both sides.
Right on both counts. It's much harder to set algorithms to deal with differences in two sensor readings. The computer version of my favorite sying: "Never ask a question that you can't accept the answer of."
Right on both counts. It's much harder to set algorithms to deal with differences in two sensor readings. The computer version of my favorite sying: "Never ask a question that you can't accept the answer of."
Well a more advanced computer could use two O2 sensors. It could adjust each side of the carburetor based on the readings of that side. If one side were to send a lean signal it could richen it up and so forth. Would be a rather waste of programming effort, though.
Well a more advanced computer could use two O2 sensors. It could adjust each side of the carburetor based on the readings of that side. If one side were to send a lean signal it could richen it up and so forth. Would be a rather waste of programming effort, though.
You're right. An even bigger waste when you consider the barrels of the carb share an open space below the butterflys.
You're right. An even bigger waste when you consider the barrels of the carb share an open space below the butterflys.
Heh well imagine having a fuel injection system with 8 O2 sensors that read each cylinder and each changing the mixture of each cylinder depending on need. Wiring harness headache!
You're right. An even bigger waste when you consider the barrels of the carb share an open space below the butterflys.
Plus the "dancing needle" is controlled by a single solenoid. The carb would need to be modified to have two independant solenoids, etc, etc, etc, and mechanics trained in how to set it up. Probably be easier to fit FI! Oh, they did that the following year I don't think the computer would have a problem monitoring 2 O2 sensors (you wouldn't believe what we managed to get even more primitive processors to do 25 years back!). It only reads the sensors every 100msecs so there's plenty of time to process & act on the info recieved. But who cares? As long as mine keeps doing its thing then I'm happy (if it fails then the cost of another carb & dist will take a huge chunk out of my cylinder head fund ).