When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey norval been a long time since I was able to post. The GM 572 is not a 4.5 x 4.5. As far as building a 632 for the same money as a 540 it starts out as thinking it will be close to the same money but to build a 632 correctly versus a 540 you end up spending 3 times as much.Not to say a 540 is not more than enuff engine for most.
Long time since you have been around. Where were you when I needed help
If a 572 is not a 4.5 x 4.5 what is it then??
Block price for a merlin 3 doesn't change from tall deck to short deck, crank price for a 4.25 stroke or 4.75 doesn't change, bore size in the block also doesn't affect price.
Where is 3 times the cost come in??
I was given the option of any bore, stroke or compression I wanted and settled for the short block so I could use my existing intake, headers, oil pan and distributor.
572 in a short deck can be either 4.375 x 4.560 or 4.25 x 4.625.
John the 4.250 stroke puts the wrist pin right into the oil ring by going the extra amount you again make it even worse not to mention the bottom of the pistons need to be even shorter to clear the crank.
As for bore a 4.5 bore has no problems with getting head gaskets, even .030 over is no problem but if you go to the larger sizes you are stuck with copper and O ringing.
If you go to the 4.625 you are out of rebores and the block is finished if something goes wrong.
A short block is pushed to the limit if you go with 572. Choose the tall deck and you are just starting to bore and stroke the block. It is by far a better alternative if you really want more cubic inches.
Again what is a 4.5 x 4.5 if not a 572???
Long time since you have been around. Where were you when I needed help
If a 572 is not a 4.5 x 4.5 what is it then??
Block price for a merlin 3 doesn't change from tall deck to short deck, crank price for a 4.25 stroke or 4.75 doesn't change, bore size in the block also doesn't affect price.
Where is 3 times the cost come in??
I was given the option of any bore, stroke or compression I wanted and settled for the short block so I could use my existing intake, headers, oil pan and distributor.
The GM 572 is not square bore stroke. A 540 can do well with lesser crank and rods but a 632 you need to step up to way more expensive and better rods and crank. A bryant crank alone can cost 3500 dollars and rods can top 1500.You need a custom oil pan that can cost 6 to 800 dollars or a dry sump would be better. Dont even think about anything but shaft rockers and a small base circle cam.All these parts add up quickly not to say you cant use them on a 540 but they are really needed on the bigger engines.The GM 572 is 4.375 stroke by the way.A 4.5 x 4.5 is a 572 just not the only way to get there.
In order to take advantage of the 632's displacement, conventional heads are pretty much out of the question. IMHO, a 540/555/565 should be plenty unless you're doing some extreme drag racing in which case this may be the wrong site/forum for that type discussion. My CNC Bowtie came with a sonic test sheet, the thinnest cylinder wall will be .240 thick at 4.625 bore and that's pretty much the same with Dart and World blocks. Keep in mind as well that aftermarket blocks are cast with much harder iron and don't wear nearly as fast as production stuff. With production blocks getting 200,000 miles, chances are you'll never even need to bore an aftermarket block unless it's needed due to catastrophic damage.
Pef427, great pic, what are you planning for hood, cut out, do the valve covers clear, did you consider or did you install a dry sump, if so was lowering or otherwise repositioning the engine a consideration? It sure looks darn good
Norval, jusy FYI, I really appreciate your car and whats gone into it, she is a beauty.
I intend to modify the new L-88 hood just like the yellow Vette's. Also like Bullshark's. I set the engine in using the original motor mounts as a guide. 427Hotrod knew which Milodon pan would clear so I ordered it. I dropped the engine and T-56 in as a unit and built a new x-member and driveshaft. Then after some trial and error with waterpumps and pulleys, I bought the CSR pump and an alt. bracket from Summit. When we went to CF CI in Bowling Green this year we went to Holley and ordered a 1250 CFM 2 circuit with a power valve. They powder coated the carb and chromed the bowls. Makes for a nice center piece...hope it runs as good as it looks.
The engine plate was added, also welded the crossrods back in front of the radiator, and am currently thinking of something to use as a mid-plate around the bellhousing area. Suggestions welcomed.
-P
In order to take advantage of the 632's displacement, conventional heads are pretty much out of the question. IMHO, a 540/555/565 should be plenty unless you're doing some extreme drag racing in which case this may be the wrong site/forum for that type discussion. My CNC Bowtie came with a sonic test sheet, the thinnest cylinder wall will be .240 thick at 4.625 bore and that's pretty much the same with Dart and World blocks. Keep in mind as well that aftermarket blocks are cast with much harder iron and don't wear nearly as fast as production stuff. With production blocks getting 200,000 miles, chances are you'll never even need to bore an aftermarket block unless it's needed due to catastrophic damage.
With a 540 you can get by with 325-340 cc heads but the 572 would like the 360cc heads. Last winter I spent the time and the money for a great set of heads with 360cc intakes and with the aid of a blower they should not have a problem feeding a little 540.
With the 572 and up bores you need to sleeve the cam oil gallery, the block becomes so thin in this area that you could strick oil. The normal procedure is to ream the gallery and then drive a tube into this reamed passage that allows oil to the cam.
This is not needed with the 540
Oiling is very critical to these large engines in regard to the valvetrain. One member has done several tests (oil pressure at front and rear of block) and has recently ground a groove in his lifters to allow better oiling. Another reason the roller cammed motors kill lifters so quickly.
He also elected to run a Gerator (sp) type pump instead of a conventional one. These pumps are quite expensive but will not allow cavitation.
-P
Oiling is very critical to these large engines in regard to the valvetrain. One member has done several tests (oil pressure at front and rear of block) and has recently ground a groove in his lifters to allow better oiling. Another reason the roller cammed motors kill lifters so quickly.
He also elected to run a Gerator (sp) type pump instead of a conventional one. These pumps are quite expensive but will not allow cavitation.
-P
Funny you mentioned oiling? Jim PM'd me and asked to check out what happens when the lifters are up or down if they block off the oil passage.
You have a large oil passage running through the lifter bores. If your lifter blocks off this gallory how will the lifters behind get oil??
Once I get my red zone Isky rollers I will have to check this out. The lifters are suppose to have a groove to allow oil to flow down this gallery but if the groove is not right or the lifter rises with the cam lift it might block off the gallery. By the time the oil gets past 7 lifters on each side is their any oil left for the last or 8th one?
I will have to remove the oil gallery plug when I get the lifters and try to measure if there is still room left for the oil to flow or if I need to increase the size of groove passing the lifter.
A very good point to make
I saw one (I think it was a 67) at Carlisle,(It was inside one of the exhibit halls and I think the car was tilted up on its side so passerbys could see the engine.... anybody get a pic?? ) but I have to say I don't care for the valve covers that come on the crate engine 572.
Didn't know Rick Moroso took his out of his 68??
Yes thats the one. It's in my shop now. We did the front & rear coilover conversion on it as well as the whole chassis. It is a 67. We are fine tuning the coilovers now. I'll get some pics in a little bit here.
Dan, how does that rear coil over attach to the hub? Just w/ the 5/8th L bolt milled down to 1/2" for the shock eye or is it a new custom (stronger) bolt?
Dan, how does that rear coil over attach to the hub? Just w/ the 5/8th L bolt milled down to 1/2" for the shock eye or is it a new custom (stronger) bolt?
They are custom made shock mounts. $300 each. For our arms that we have going into production will be a little different. There is a bracket that will come off the t-arm for the lower mount of the coilover shock. New shock mounts will no longer be in a "L" shape. They will be straight and support the other side of the bracket that the coilovers sits in. I just sent out the bracket yesterday to get made up. I finally found someone that wants to work .
OK Dan, how much for that car after my 10% forum discount?
This is not my car. A guy by the name of Jerry Clark owns it and he did everything but the frame at his shop, Jerry's Vette Service. He'll be getting rid of it shortly, you can give him a call. In Corvette Enthuists Magazine, they did a whole write up on this car over 3 or 4 issues. It's a very impressive car inside & out.
Since you asked specifically about a 572, here are a couple of a 572 and notice the hood and air cleaner mods. The L-88 hood was cut and moved back and up to clear the taller engine assembly. This is what I plan to do. Megalodon said he can do it, I'll post pics when it's finished. Then to the paint booth!
This hood mod is what Bullshark has to clear his Ramjet 502 and it looks great.
-P
I LOVE the 572 on the hood 5 from a 454 I guess and 72 from the 427?