When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have an 81 vette th350 and wish for a 4speed with od, the clear to most would be the 700r4 for the thirilling 1st gear but from speaking with chris at bowtie overdrives the 200 is a more sound choice for my applications my question is if I went with the 700r4 you have to have the drive shaft shaved and re balanced would it be possible just to purchase a drive shaft from an 82 vette that came with a 700r4 or would i still need to have it balanced?? if this has been asked before I apolgize and please help would you go wtih the 2004r or the 700r4
the use of my car is a cruiser but every now and then or kinda offen I like to put my foot down and enjoy the rush but I relax drive quiet often really need help figuring this one out either trans mission would be a stage 3 from bow tie over drive?? help me please?
I have an 81 vette th350 and wish for a 4speed with od, the clear to most would be the 700r4 for the thirilling 1st gear but from speaking with chris at bowtie overdrives the 200 is a more sound choice for my applications my question is if I went with the 700r4 you have to have the drive shaft shaved and re balanced would it be possible just to purchase a drive shaft from an 82 vette that came with a 700r4 or would i still need to have it balanced?? if this has been asked before I apolgize and please help would you go wtih the 2004r or the 700r4
the use of my car is a cruiser but every now and then or kinda offen I like to put my foot down and enjoy the rush but I relax drive quiet often really need help figuring this one out either trans mission would be a stage 3 from bow tie over drive?? help me please?
I have an 81 and went with the 200-4r. The 200 has a slightly higher first gear than the 350 but not as much as the 700. Frankly, i can't notice the difference. The OD is definately nice.
I always wondered about the 82 drive shaft idea. Certainly, the length should be fine but I'm not sure if the rear U-joint size is the same. Otherwise, I think that it should work but have never heard anyone that tried it.
The 700 is better for rear gears of 3.08 or higher (lower numerically), while the 200 is better with 3.36 or lower (higher numerically).
Getting a direshaft shortened and balanced should cost only $100 or less...
Doug
Originally Posted by CA-Legal-Vette
I have an 81 and went with the 200-4r. The 200 has a slightly higher first gear than the 350 but not as much as the 700. Frankly, i can't notice the difference. The OD is definately nice.
I always wondered about the 82 drive shaft idea. Certainly, the length should be fine but I'm not sure if the rear U-joint size is the same. Otherwise, I think that it should work but have never heard anyone that tried it.
I am a fan of the 700r4. I like the 3.06 first gear ratio. It allows for great accelleration with a 3.08 axle. You do not "need" alot of rear gear to make them work. When properly built, they are reliable, at a reasonable cost. I have one in my own car that runs high 10 sec et's and has been reliable.
I replaced the TH350 on my 79 with Bowtie's 2004R. I reused the stock shaft and u-joint no problem. My 79 has the 355 rear so the 1st gear in the 2004R is plenty low enough. Shift RPM with the stage 3 the way my TV cable is adjusted is 6100 RPM behind my slightly modified engine and the shifts are very firm and crisp with the stage 3.
i have the 700r4.......... dougs point is RIGHT ON TARGET......pay attention to this
IF I keep the 700, replacing parts yet again.....I will ditch my 336 ratio and go for a 308 rear at least that nearly useless first gear may not shift so fast, as it is the thing shifts in about 2 seconds in normal driving, IF that....engine doing maybe 2500 rpm.....even if it tip the can a bit, thing shifts well before 4000 rpms......useless first gear, why bother with it....
frankly I dunno why a 4 speed automatic anyway....hell a .7 overdrive in a th 350 would be fine, with any normal lockup converter....2.0, to 1.0 to .7 or even .6 overdrive would be a wonderful gearset, with a 336 rear, not much for trucks but a 3300 lbs vette with any 350 engine, perfect....maybe not for 60' times, but as a street driver with decent rubber....hell, any automatic with any V8 can break the street tires loose no sweat....more than that seems a bit of a waste, no??
IF I keep the 700, replacing parts yet again.....I will ditch my 336 ratio and go for a 308 rear at least that nearly useless first gear may not shift so fast, as it is the thing shifts in about 2 seconds in normal driving, IF that....engine doing maybe 2500 rpm.....even if it tip the can a bit, thing shifts well before 4000 rpms......useless first gear, why bother with it....
frankly I dunno why a 4 speed automatic anyway....hell a .7 overdrive in a th 350 would be fine, with any normal lockup converter....2.0, to 1.0 to .7 or even .6 overdrive would be a wonderful gearset, with a 336 rear, not much for trucks but a 3300 lbs vette with any 350 engine, perfect....maybe not for 60' times, but as a street driver with decent rubber....hell, any automatic with any V8 can break the street tires loose no sweat....more than that seems a bit of a waste, no??
The 3.06 first gear does become a disadvantage when there is a bit of rear gear in the car. It isn't fun if you cannot hook it up.
From a dollar and cents point of view, you may very well be better off with a well built 2004r. It will save the expense of changing rear gears.
You can adjust the governor to have them shift where ever you want.
B&M sells a kit with various weight and springs etc, likely others as well. My 700 WOT 1-2 shifts at 6K RPM, and 2-3/3-4 at 5.5K RPM (have to let off a little at top of 3 to get it to shift), with one spring removed (I think, it's been a while?). TV Cable adjustment infuences this as well.
The 700's 3.06 first gear was designed for a 3.08 performance rear gear, and works great with one (that's what I have in my C3, and it's what was available in C4's too). If you have a lower rear gear you'll never hook in first with street tires...
Doug
Originally Posted by mrvette
IF I keep the 700, replacing parts yet again.....I will ditch my 336 ratio and go for a 308 rear at least that nearly useless first gear may not shift so fast, as it is the thing shifts in about 2 seconds in normal driving, IF that....engine doing maybe 2500 rpm.....even if it tip the can a bit, thing shifts well before 4000 rpms......useless first gear, why bother with it....
frankly I dunno why a 4 speed automatic anyway....hell a .7 overdrive in a th 350 would be fine, with any normal lockup converter....2.0, to 1.0 to .7 or even .6 overdrive would be a wonderful gearset, with a 336 rear, not much for trucks but a 3300 lbs vette with any 350 engine, perfect....maybe not for 60' times, but as a street driver with decent rubber....hell, any automatic with any V8 can break the street tires loose no sweat....more than that seems a bit of a waste, no??
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.