C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Balanced or Unbalanced Stroker Kit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #1  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default Balanced or Unbalanced Stroker Kit?

Shopping for a 383 stroker kit, lots of choices. I am considering buying a balanced ready to assemble kit vs one you have to get balanced. There is a little savings verses getting it done locally.
Wondering if this is a good idea? How reliable or accurate the factory balance is compared an engine builders balance....Mark

Last edited by mbeeman350; Oct 20, 2006 at 09:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
79VetteMike's Avatar
79VetteMike
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 1
From: OKC Oklahoma
Default

Get it done locally by someone you know and trust knows what they are doing. A GOOD balance job needs to be done by a pro.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2006 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
ratflinger's Avatar
ratflinger
NCM Grand Opening Veteran
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,979
Likes: 384
From: South of giving a damn
St. Jude Donor '11, '17
Default

Here's my $.02. I bought a forged & balanced Eagle kit. My machinist had installed & balanced plenty of Eagle kits & this was the 1st one he had seen that was factory balanced. He was dubious about the claimed balance, as was I. He took the balance card & said he would personally check the balance & only charge me if re-balance was necessary. I did not have to pay for a re-balance as the Eagle kit was spot on with the balance card & my machinist was satisfied. So yes, the factory balance can be spot on, however I feel much better that my local machinist also agrees. I think Eagle charges $150 extra to balance the kit, if your machinist is in the ball park it might give you piece of mind to have him do it.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 08:36 AM
  #4  
norvalwilhelm's Avatar
norvalwilhelm
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11,872
Likes: 12
From: Waterloo ontario Canada
Default

I would put more trust a company like Eagle then a local balancer. I feel a company like eagle who does thousands a these assemblies will have the best equipment and hopefully a man who knows how to do it right. A local machine shop might have old equipment and not always the experienced help to do the job.
I went with a factory balance with my 540
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 09:04 AM
  #5  
ratflinger's Avatar
ratflinger
NCM Grand Opening Veteran
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,979
Likes: 384
From: South of giving a damn
St. Jude Donor '11, '17
Default

Norval has a point. It makes a difference on the type of machinist you frequent. Mine happens to build high endurance race engines and has his own Bonneville car. I might have more faith if this wasn't the first balanced rotating assembly I had purchased.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #6  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default

Norval and Ratflinger you make a good point. On one side I would have more piece of mind with the balance done locally. But Eagle and Scat should have state of the art balancing equipment...that should yield a more precise balance job..thanks ...Mark
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
Ironcross's Avatar
Ironcross
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,142
Likes: 54
From: Taylor Michigan
Default

One less problem to deal with, let the company that built the kit balance it.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 07:05 PM
  #8  
ratflinger's Avatar
ratflinger
NCM Grand Opening Veteran
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,979
Likes: 384
From: South of giving a damn
St. Jude Donor '11, '17
Default

Originally Posted by Ironcross
One less problem to deal with, let the company that built the kit balance it.


And my machinist would agree too. Like I said, my rotating assembly proved to be balanced from Eagle. I had not done this before & neither had my machinist, so we were both curious as to the accuracy of the Eagel techs. Apparently they know what they are doing.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 10:05 PM
  #9  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default

Seems like Scat and Eagle own the stroker market. Looking at both and each has its merits....Scat with its 9000 series crank, Eagle seems to offer more internally balanced kits.....way too many decisions.....Both seem good though
Just need to decide, still have some questions though. Do I need a smaller base circle cam? Different oil pan (than the stock)....
Mark
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2006 | 10:46 PM
  #10  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by mbeeman350
Seems like Scat and Eagle own the stroker market. Looking at both and each has its merits....Scat with its 9000 series crank, Eagle seems to offer more internally balanced kits.....way too many decisions.....Both seem good though
Just need to decide, still have some questions though. Do I need a smaller base circle cam? Different oil pan (than the stock)....
Mark
Lots of choices. Get stroker clearanced rods and you should be fine on cam clearance with a 383 unless your going with a really extreme lift. Internal balance is a much better option. The Scat 9000 crank is cast, Forged is better, cast is more economical. Oil pan should be fine but the block will have to be clearanced for the new assembly and the pan rails may or may not have to be clearanced. I like the Eagle forged, internally balanced rotating assembly with stroker H beams W/7/16 cap screws. It is a little more $ but will allow future upgrades (Nitrous) and is pretty much bulletproof. It is a +700 HP bottom end that won't come apart on a full throttle 7000 RPM powershift missed gear.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #11  
bluegtp's Avatar
bluegtp
Drifting
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 293
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Default

I 2nd mako.....if you have the money, go with h beams and forged crank etc.......


As in my case....I just want the car to stick up for itself (it's a 79 turd)....and it'll be driven mostly on street with the occassional romp of course....and I'm not looking to make over 500hp.....so I went with the scat 9000 crank...I'm getting my machine shop to check it and make sure it's balanced....through my research I've found some cases where some of scat's products weren't to spec.....I'm getting the rods balanced anyways cause I chose the 5.7 rods that weren't clearanced for a 383.......I got a great deal on the stuff though...


yeah do make sure you get the rods clearanced for the 383....it's a little bit of work putting together, taking apart, etc. to make sure it clearances the cam.....I have an extreme energy cam with a .507 and .510 lift and it's fine...so yeah, you should be good on the cam unless you go pretty big...


I'm in the process of building this thing, that's why I'm typing alot!...and just trying to share what I've learned....hope it helps ya!



ryan
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #12  
ratflinger's Avatar
ratflinger
NCM Grand Opening Veteran
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,979
Likes: 384
From: South of giving a damn
St. Jude Donor '11, '17
Default

The bottom end of my 396 is built. It's the Eagle forged kit & the pan rails took a lot of clearancing (and this block came clearanced for 3.80 from GM), but maybe my machinist perferred max clearance instead of minimum. Normal base circle cam is fine, my lift is under .600. I'll test fit my Hamburger pan today, to make sure it fits. Now if AFR would just kick some heads free.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #13  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default

Originally Posted by bluegtp
I 2nd mako.....if you have the money, go with h beams and forged crank etc.......


As in my case....I just want the car to stick up for itself (it's a 79 turd)....and it'll be driven mostly on street with the occassional romp of course....and I'm not looking to make over 500hp.....so I went with the scat 9000 crank...I'm getting my machine shop to check it and make sure it's balanced....through my research I've found some cases where some of scat's products weren't to spec.....I'm getting the rods balanced anyways cause I chose the 5.7 rods that weren't clearanced for a 383.......I got a great deal on the stuff though...

ryan
Ryan that's what I am trying to do. This 72, base engine, TH400 with 308 gears can't spin the tires!!!
This car is all matching numbers with original maifolds, carb, starter tranny etc. I need a rebuild, so I am doing a few mods and figure if I need a crank, pistons, etc might as well go for the 383. Do not plan on twisting it past 5,500 rpm (have a rev limiter) to protect the block...
Mark
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 09:53 AM
  #14  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by mbeeman350
Ryan that's what I am trying to do. This 72, base engine, TH400 with 308 gears can't spin the tires!!!
This car is all matching numbers with original maifolds, carb, starter tranny etc. I need a rebuild, so I am doing a few mods and figure if I need a crank, pistons, etc might as well go for the 383. Do not plan on twisting it past 5,500 rpm (have a rev limiter) to protect the block...
Mark
The cast crank should be fine for your application. 6" rods would be a good idea also. Doesn't change the kit price but better angle on the rotation to reduce side loading of the cylinder wall. A scat rotating assembly would be fine and probably save you $400 to $500 vs the forged kit.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
mandm1200's Avatar
mandm1200
Melting Slicks
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 1
From: New Cumberland PA
Default

Originally Posted by bluegtp
yeah do make sure you get the rods clearanced for the 383....it's a little bit of work putting together, taking apart, etc. to make sure it clearances the cam.....
My machine shop clipped (ground) 2 rod bolts prior to balancing. I believe it was rods 2 and 6. I checked rod to cam clearance prior to assembly. The cam I have is .460" lift. I thinking of going to something bigger. Is the issuse of clearance with a lobe or is it the base circle? If its on the base circle, then changing cam should not create any clearance problem.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 10:49 PM
  #16  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default

Originally Posted by 63mako
The cast crank should be fine for your application. 6" rods would be a good idea also. Doesn't change the kit price but better angle on the rotation to reduce side loading of the cylinder wall. A scat rotating assembly would be fine and probably save you $400 to $500 vs the forged kit.
Thanks 63mako for your comments and advice....
I hear both good and bad on Eagle and Scat???? Hard to choose

What happens when a balanced set up is bought...are the rods clearanced? If not the factory balancing would be for nothing!!!
Mark
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 11:18 PM
  #17  
ratflinger's Avatar
ratflinger
NCM Grand Opening Veteran
Supporting Lifetime Gold
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 20,979
Likes: 384
From: South of giving a damn
St. Jude Donor '11, '17
Default

You have to check the kit specs. I believe that Eagle only clearances their H-beam rods, which only come in their forged kit. Of course I could be wrong. Call Scat or Eagle up & see if they have cast kits that include stroker rods. BTW-stroker rods are clearanced for the cam, not the block. The block still needs clearanced.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Balanced or Unbalanced Stroker Kit?

Old Oct 23, 2006 | 12:34 AM
  #18  
bluegtp's Avatar
bluegtp
Drifting
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 293
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Default

I would definatley call eagle or scat to double check thing before you purchase......and make sure you understand everything on it and what you are buying......I made the mistake of not looking all the way into it and bought the 5.7 rods that weren't clearanced for the cam....it's really no big deal as long as you konw what you are doing and have some feeler gauges....


2 & 6 were the ones to hit.....I believe the minimum clearance between the cam and rod is .040....I thought it was .050...so mine have .050....ha, oh well!


for you mark I believe the cast set up should be fine....if you're only going to run on the street and reving to 5500.....Mine will rev to about 6000-6500 with the cast crank.....everyone I've talked with about this says it should be fine with the little blips of 6000-6500....it's not gonna be a roadcourse car...seeing high rpms all the time for a long period of time....and will prob rarely get up there anyways....the compression ratio will be around 10.4:1 or less.....I have a few write-ups I've found on the net I can email you if you want....there was two that I found very helpful.....just let me know!

mandm1200:
if I remember right they were hitting the lobes of the cam, not the base circle....someone correct me though if I'm wrong.......





ryan

Last edited by bluegtp; Oct 23, 2006 at 12:50 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #19  
bluegtp's Avatar
bluegtp
Drifting
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 293
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
Default

oh yeah, my car's a numbers mathcing too...stock tranny too...little bit of an age difference though!....I would get some headers to go with it.....


.I was in the same boat you are....my motor had been rebuilt, but never bored over.....the crank was scared too bad to reuse from no oil pressure and 6 of the rods matched and the other 2 were misc. rods......the oil had gas in it somehow....so I'm like you I figured what the heck, I'm buying a new crank and rods anyways, why not new pistons....oh, why not a stoker kit....and then I went, well, why not some heads and a new cam....so on, it just kept going....the motor will be brand new except for the aftermarket dist. that was already on it and rocker arms..........



ryan
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 11:38 PM
  #20  
mbeeman350's Avatar
mbeeman350
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 27
From: Auburndale Florida
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
St. Jude Donor '03-'05-'06-'07-'09
Default

Originally Posted by bluegtp
oh yeah, my car's a numbers mathcing too...stock tranny too...little bit of an age difference though!....I would get some headers to go with it.....


.I was in the same boat you are....my motor had been rebuilt, but never bored over.....the crank was scared too bad to reuse from no oil pressure and 6 of the rods matched and the other 2 were misc. rods......the oil had gas in it somehow....so I'm like you I figured what the heck, I'm buying a new crank and rods anyways, why not new pistons....oh, why not a stoker kit....and then I went, well, why not some heads and a new cam....so on, it just kept going....the motor will be brand new except for the aftermarket dist. that was already on it and rocker arms..........ryan
bluegtp thanks for the comments....I have a 05 GP for a daily driver, not a GTP though. Any issues with the supercharged 3.8 ?
Mark
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-1
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE