When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am in the market for another trans. I have been searching the forum and am a bit confused about which direction to go. I know there are going to be tons of opinions but in a 78 with a 350HP crate (or so they say...) which trans woud be the best way to go? What are the advantages of one over the other? Are there any recomendations on where to buy something dependable and well built? I bought a "Steeet Fighter" trans from Jegs several years ago for a Ford F100 project I was working on and all it has ever done is leak...
1) bolt in fit. Even the TH350 yoke and stock driveshaft can be used.
2) great gearing.. Big first gear but not too huge spacing between gears.
3) low drivetrain loss (less than TH700R4)
4) lower weight than TH00R4
5) can be built equally as strong as TH700R4 or even stronger.
6) biggest overdrive gear of any common GM OD automatic tranny (.67)
I have over 150 passes on my TH200R4 (built by CPT Transmission) in my 10 second '68 Vette and I haven't had any transmission issues yet!
For 350hp a 700R4 can handle that too. Either one will have to be built to handle it. I have a 700R4 in both my 'Vette and my '83 truck and am very happy with them.
My '95 Suburban has a 4L60E which shares some internals with the 700R4/4L60. I have towed many trailers and it is not a light vehicle. Turned over 200K miles the other day. It was serviced at 100K. Still shifts like it did 100K miles ago.
Which ever way you go, be sure to properly adjust the TV cable BEFORE you drive it.
Which ever way you go, be sure to properly adjust the TV cable BEFORE you drive it.
Can you explain this process a little? I too will be installing a 200R4 and will need to understand this as I'll be doing that part of the install. Thanks.
1) bolt in fit. Even the TH350 yoke and stock driveshaft can be used.
2) great gearing.. Big first gear but not too huge spacing between gears.
3) low drivetrain loss (less than TH700R4)
4) lower weight than TH00R4
5) can be built equally as strong as TH700R4 or even stronger.
6) biggest overdrive gear of any common GM OD automatic tranny (.67)
I have over 150 passes on my TH200R4 (built by CPT Transmission) in my 10 second '68 Vette and I haven't had any transmission issues yet!
There are two listed wirings for the 200, and some dozen for the 700 on converter lockup....but so it seems I have the more common version of either, and so in my switch from 700 to 200, I am using the same cable, and just plugged it in the other day...
looks as if it will work.....engine not finished assembling yet....
For a light car, like a Corvette, the 2004R is an excellent match in terms of reliability, economy, and fit, in my opinion.
The 700R4 is better suited for light to medium duty pick up trucks. The 2004R really isn't built for towing and carrying a large load, but how much weight are you honestly going to be dragging around in a Corvette? The gearing in the 2004R is more evenly spaced and easier on the tires, while the gearing on the 700 starts with like a 3.07 and then drops to like a 1.7, or somewhere around there. I had a '95 Camaro Z28 and a '94 Firebird with the 4L60E and 4L60. Both would shred tires with ease if you just floored it from a stop. This is with only ~300hp and a measily 160hp.
Yes, I had allways considered the first gear of my 700 to be completely useless with 336 rear end....allways shifted in about 2 seconds....then wound out 2nd forever it seemed, and 3/4 was a decent shift point so I left it alone...
wondering what that Trans Go kit will do for me in that 200 I have, cant' wait to get it going, but other issues with work being done are delaying getting there, maybe by Christmas...maybe....
Yes, I had allways considered the first gear of my 700 to be completely useless with 336 rear end....allways shifted in about 2 seconds....then wound out 2nd forever it seemed, and 3/4 was a decent shift point so I left it alone...
wondering what that Trans Go kit will do for me in that 200 I have, cant' wait to get it going, but other issues with work being done are delaying getting there, maybe by Christmas...maybe....
That's why cars equiped with them usually had gears in the high 2s. Had to put that short little bugger to some sort of use! The Grand National used a 2004R.
Besides the trans and T. Converter do I need anything else (for lock-up, ect...)?
I have a non-lockup converter as lockup converters aren't too well suited for racing...
The way I set up the TV cable is so that at WOT, the cable is fully pulled out!
From what I understand...the existing cross member from a TH400 will allow the TH200R4 to bolt right up. The TH350 cross member requires it to be moved back a little, or have the holes enlarged. I think a TH700R4 needs a new cross member all together.
1) bolt in fit. Even the TH350 yoke and stock driveshaft can be used.
2) great gearing.. Big first gear but not too huge spacing between gears.
3) low drivetrain loss (less than TH700R4)
4) lower weight than TH00R4
5) can be built equally as strong as TH700R4 or even stronger.
6) biggest overdrive gear of any common GM OD automatic tranny (.67)
I have over 150 passes on my TH200R4 (built by CPT Transmission) in my 10 second '68 Vette and I haven't had any transmission issues yet!
I have a 74 coupe with 454/TH-400/3.08 and am considering a swap to an OD trans. but have wondered which one would be best overall for my application in terms of fit, ease of installation, gearing, and reliability. I am also considering swapping out my tired 454 for a ZZ502 crate engine (502 hp, 567 torque).
So the 200R4 is a bolt-in for the TH-400? What about the cross member? What about the driveshaft? What are the ratios? Can both lock-up and non-lock-up converters be used?
Is the 4L80E or 4L85E better suited behind a big block? Thanks.
From what I understand...the existing cross member from a TH400 will allow the TH200R4 to bolt right up. The TH350 cross member requires it to be moved back a little, or have the holes enlarged. I think a TH700R4 needs a new cross member all together.
The 700R4 either needs a bracket for the exixting crossmember or a new crossmember. Bowtie discontinued selling the bracket as they can make more money on a crossmember..
The 700R4 either needs a bracket for the exixting crossmember or a new crossmember. Bowtie discontinued selling the bracket as they can make more money on a crossmember..
Is it true that when replacing a TH350 with a TH200R4, all you have to do is move the stock cross member back about two inches?
The 700R4 has a Tailhousing option that put's the mount roughly an inch farther back than the 400's, so you just have to drill a couple of holes is all (same as the 82 C3). You'll also need to move the Handbrake Cable Pulley over an inch or so most likely, shorten the Driveshaft (under $100), and everything else bolts up etc.
The 700R4 and 2004R are of equal strength when properly built, and deciding on one or the other should depend on your rear gears, with 3.08 and lower numerically using a 700R4, and 3.55 and higher numerically using a 2004R, with 3.2x - 3.3x kind of workable for either depending on usage and tire type etc.
On either the Governor can be adjusted to put the shiftpoints where you want them.
My 700R4 has lived for some 13 years behind the 406/375 in my 71 Coupe, which runs high 12's on street tires, with no problems.
Doug
Originally Posted by Durango_boy
From what I understand...the existing cross member from a TH400 will allow the TH200R4 to bolt right up. The TH350 cross member requires it to be moved back a little, or have the holes enlarged. I think a TH700R4 needs a new cross member all together.
Is it true that when replacing a TH350 with a TH200R4, all you have to do is move the stock cross member back about two inches?
Th350 and TH200R4 have identical mounting locations... With the 200R4 you should be able to use the stock location. Well, at least on earlier C3's it's that way..
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.