C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Engine builders please step inside.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
1Z87L8's Avatar
1Z87L8
Thread Starter
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 1
Default Engine builders please step inside.

OK here is a little background on what i have.
i have a 78 with a 78-350 non numbers matched engine to my car that i
bought last year.
PO knew nothing about the engine but when i had the drivers door apart
last year i found a 4sale sign that said rebuilt engine, new cam and lifters, new clutch.

although it does run like a fairly new engine with the exception of a puff of smoke at start up, i recently had it apart to verify that it really did have at least some work done to it.
what i found was steel timing chain gears so at least that part was true
very clean oil pan inside and just one small piece of rubber in the oil pump screen.
the clutch does feel like a new and has plenty of adjustment left
also the car has a very slight lope at idle as in extremely mild cam is probably installed.
the heads were very clean inside and it does have stock valve springs in place.

i am gong to REDO the valve seals with the viton replacements as
recommended here on the forum.

and now for the questions, while the rockers are off

what are the benefits of replacing the rockers with roller tip style?

if i did go with roller tipped should i increase to 1.6 ratio?

could i increase to 1.6 without knowing current cam lift?

if i did go with the 1.6 ratios how much more lift does that equate to
and is it actually worth it performance wise?


as always any and all answers you guys provide is
GREATLY APPRECIATED
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 10:20 AM
  #2  
Gordonm's Avatar
Gordonm
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 19,610
Likes: 778
From: Forked River NJ
Default

Sent you a PM
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #3  
MotorHead's Avatar
MotorHead
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 17,673
Likes: 199
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Default

Your car might go faster but this would only be as a result of a lighter wallet.

Seriously don't waste your money on roller tip rockers on a mild motor. Especially 1.6 ratio unless you know the specs on the springs and cam. You could get into coil bind and one thing commonly overlooked is the fact that 1.6 rockers will bring the pushrods in towards the valves more than 1.5 rockers and they could rub on the heads.

Just for info 1.6 rockers will get you about .300-.400 more lift depending on the original lift of the cam
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2006 | 04:12 PM
  #4  
Edzred72's Avatar
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 3
From: Wildwood IL
Default

Originally Posted by MotorHead

Just for info 1.6 rockers will get you about .300-.400 more lift
I think Motorhead accidentally typed the wrong numbers. Honest mistake. He means to say .030-.040 extra lift. (30 thousands-40 thousands) not 300 thousands to 400 thousands.
He probably types as fast as his car goes!!!
Eddie
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #5  
coupeguy2001's Avatar
coupeguy2001
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,050
Likes: 147
From: Phoenix AZ
2021 C4 of the Year - Modified Finalist
Default rockers

1.6 are ok, and, any thing you can do to cut friction is in your benefit.
If it's a stock engine,(just a rering or a bore job with stock pistons)you will be ok.
If it lopes at idle, and it's not severe, to see in your garage b 4 you spend money on a set of rockers you can't use, add a .045 feeler gauge to one intake and one exhaust valve between the rocker and the valve, adjust the valves with the engine off, and by hand, pull it through till both valves operate and go back down on their seats. if no binding, or thunk, 1.6's are probably going to be ok.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Engine builders please step inside.





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE