C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Desktop Dyno: Seat to Seat or @ .050

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2007, 04:45 PM
  #1  
nastee383
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
nastee383's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Ft. Walton Beach, Fl USA
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Desktop Dyno: Seat to Seat or @ .050

Why does Desktop Dyno show significantly different numbers for the same cam at .050 vs seat to seat in a given combination? I understand its two different methods but its still the same cam. AND which are more accurate?
Old 02-04-2007, 05:09 PM
  #2  
dgruenke
Drifting
 
dgruenke's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: New Baden Illinois
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You use the different points of measurement depending on what brand cam you are using. For example, the Crane and Summit cams give their measurements at .050. However, for a Comp cam, Comp gives their numbers at .006. Therefore, for the Comp cam, you use the seat-to-seat.

It gives you the choice of using either because cam companies don't feel like giving measurements at the same point.
Old 02-04-2007, 10:09 PM
  #3  
stingr69
Le Mans Master
 
stingr69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock AR
Posts: 6,612
Received 1,043 Likes on 808 Posts

Default

Seat to seat is more accurate with that program. It even says that in the documentation. If you input .050" numbers it will back out to some assumed seat to seat numbers when it does the calculations.

-Mark.
Old 02-04-2007, 11:11 PM
  #4  
nastee383
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
nastee383's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Ft. Walton Beach, Fl USA
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think I understand where you are coming from but if you put in the timing at .050 for THAT cam and then you put in the timing seat to seat for THAT cam shouldn't it be virtually the same? Some cam manufacturers give timing at .050 AND seat and it still shows different #'s. I know they say seat is more accurate but it would seem .050 is the same point for every cam and some measure their seat timing at different points. So I don't understand why seat timing would be more accurate.
Old 02-05-2007, 08:12 AM
  #5  
stingr69
Le Mans Master
 
stingr69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock AR
Posts: 6,612
Received 1,043 Likes on 808 Posts

Default

The program makes some assumptions based on seat to seat timing and an assumed ramp rate. If your lobe profile is different from what it assumed and you use .050 numbers in the program, you have introduced a discrepancy. Garbage in - Garbage out.

Solid lifter cams require special care when inputting the data as your cam card info does not reflect net lift due to lash. The cam card spec numbers are for cam checking and assume zero lash.

Play with it until you get the biggest horsepower -JK

-Mark.
Old 02-05-2007, 05:02 PM
  #6  
BigBlockk
Drifting
 
BigBlockk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: North Bend Ohio
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Seat to seat timing gives you the exact ramp intensity. Using .050 numbers forces the software to estimate ramp intensity. This is the reason for the differences in output.

BigBlockk

Later.....

Get notified of new replies

To Desktop Dyno: Seat to Seat or @ .050




Quick Reply: Desktop Dyno: Seat to Seat or @ .050



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 AM.