When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Lake Arrowhead - Georgia > 72 Base Coupe & 74 BB Roadster
74 BB - rods ?
Actually two questions on 74 LS4
1. See the number(s) 7 stamped into the rod...??? All of my rods are stamped according to their location in the block. I have never seen this before. This motor has never been "opened" til now.
2. On the front of each cylinder is stamped ... a VERY small diamond with a 5 in the center....any idea what this meant, if anything?
1. See the number(s) 7 stamped into the rod...??? All of my rods are stamped according to their location in the block. I have never seen this before. This motor has never been "opened" til now.
2. On the front of each cylinder is stamped ... a VERY small diamond with a 5 in the center....any idea what this meant, if anything?
Answer to #1...It's common for piston/rod assy.'s to be stamped, even at the factory. In this case it was probably for the rod caps, they are matched to the rods. Besides that, how sure are you the engine has never been apart? It may have had a problem in the past that did not require a full rebuild.
This question has been posted about rod markings from the factory many times on this and other Chevrolet forums...The responce is always with documentation , that the rods ''were not, and never were labeled for factory assembly..The motor has been apart before ..IMHO
This question has been posted about rod markings from the factory many times on this and other Chevrolet forums...The responce is always with documentation , that the rods ''were not, and never were labeled for factory assembly..The motor has been apart before ..IMHO
Thanks for the heads up on the "official response". I've never paid a lot of attention to the resto stuff. I know that some factories do and was going on that.
This question has been posted about rod markings from the factory many times on this and other Chevrolet forums...The responce is always with documentation , that the rods ''were not, and never were labeled for factory assembly..The motor has been apart before ..IMHO
It does not make any sence to me. I have torn down bbc engines that have the original bearings with date stamps(in the bearings) indicating that they have never been opened up before.( some within a year of being built) also the stamp markings have been the same size & depth.( indicating the same die, they are alot of different stamp makers out there & I dont believe that everyone that owns a bbc are buying thier stamps from the same manufacture) The mains on a bbc are also factory stamped, where the sbc are never stamped (mains or rods) Starting in 1987 when GM went to the one piece rear main seal they started casting the numbers on the main caps of the sbc, but still no numbers on the rods.
At times I questioned it also , so I ask the question ..If the crank is factory fresh...why label connecting rods..??
Your kidding! One important obvious issue for sure is so the caps do not get crossed, as for example 1 on 4, or whatever. They do have to come apart to hang them dont they? The people doing the assembly are not exactly rocket scientists. But hopefully they most likely can count and read numbers.
I've torn down hundreds and it's very rare when I find one that doesn't have the rods marked. PM rods in the late 90's stuff seem to be a hit and miss but big blocks are marked 99% of the time. Same with main caps, if you get 'em clean, most have marks.