350 or 400 shortblock
Since I initially wanted a 383 stroker would a 400 shortblock get me similar performance? I have read that a 400 will provide really good torque at low rpms.
This will be going in a 77 with a THD 350 and 3:08 gears. I already have 186 heads w/ 64cc chambers. I was told these could be used with a gasket that blocks the steam holes.
Any opinions would be appreciated.
It was my understanding that a smaller intake runner was better for low end torque. Since this will be a weekend street driver I want all the torque possible. Not so concerned with the top end. Will never go to the track. Just want a good launch.
Do I really need to ditch these heads if I go with the 400 block? Does the 400 block offer enough additional performance / torque to justify selling the current heads and buying others?
Last edited by myc3; Mar 1, 2007 at 03:34 PM.
If you are commited to these heads they will work and provide good torque but will not produce the HP that a 400 is capable of making.





Here is the low down on GM 400 blocks. Best casting number (last 3 #'s top or rear block) is 509, next 511, and last is 817 (soft). An 010 or 020 in the front timing cover denotes a higher nickle content which is good. You will want a 2 bolt main in a 400, the main webs are stronger than the 4 bolt blocks (prone to crack). If you are not making much over 400HP and keep RPM's around 5500 then a 4 bolt can be ok.
Inspect the block and look at the area around the front and rear cam hole. There will be a raised area around this hole that looks like a washer, you want this "washer" to be even all the way around. there is no hole but the rear of the block has the same raised area. If it is thicker on one side than the other then there was significant core shift when the block was made. You can also look in the lifter valley and see if all the lifter bores are centered down the valley front to rear. If these are off the wall thickness will vary from one side of the cylinder wall to the other (not good). If these look good then the next thing is have the cylinder walls sonic tested for thickness.
On the heads...DO NOT block the steam holes with the gasket!!! Have steam holes drilled in the heads to match the gasket in whatever heads you decide to use. With 64 cc combustion chambers you will want to run a pretty good size dish piston to keep compression in the pump gas friendly area. I also recommend using head studs as the decks on 400's sometimes crack around the head bolt holes. inpect that area too. Would do well to have deck and main web areas mag checked.
The heads you have are outdated but you could use them IMHO. As you stated you want torque so those heads would keep the powerband lower in the RPM range. Your heads with 202 valves will flow better on the 400 due to the larger bore size. There will be less restriction and increased flow around the valve closest to the cylinder wall. If the car will not see track time you may not notice the difference. You could sell your heads and get some better ones though. A set of late model vortec heads should be considered and will work nicely on the 400 and are affordable, but you have to get a new intake to match them. if you go with 195 or 210 CC heads you will gain HP in the upper RPM range but your torque curve will also move up.
Also agree with above posts, if you have to buy a crank kit go internal balance and step up the stroke to 3.8. I would not go more than that on a GM block. Lots of people do YMMV. Get some 5.7" rods and the lightest forged pistons you can afford. 6" rods and pistons are more $$$ and not necessary IMO.
You will be much happier with a good 400 than with the 383 I think.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
But, I would go with the 400 with the 3.08. I built a 400 for a Jeep in '76 for off-road use. I had a mild cam, with 64cc angle plug heads, 500cfm 2brl holley, headers, close-ratio 4 speed, aluminum fly wheel, 3.73 gears. Peaked out by 5000, but it was a stump-puller from 800 to 5000 rpm.
Here is the low down on GM 400 blocks. Best casting number (last 3 #'s top or rear block) is 509, next 511, and last is 817 (soft). An 010 or 020 in the front timing cover denotes a higher nickle content which is good. You will want a 2 bolt main in a 400, the main webs are stronger than the 4 bolt blocks (prone to crack). If you are not making much over 400HP and keep RPM's around 5500 then a 4 bolt can be ok.
Do your homework around cam selection too. 400s exhibit behavior closer to a big block. They can take more duration.
Thanks for the complements guys!
nice to hear those kind words. Yes do drill whatever heads you choose for steam holes
! very important! I post again "DO NOT BLOCK STEAM HOLES!!!"
Wish I had a 509 2-bolt... I have a 511 and an 817, both have little to no core shift and are std bore :-)
If I can get away with it I will be using std pistons and internal balance on both with 5.7" rods.
BLACKHORSEVET
If you can I would save those 40 over pistons for a down the road rebuild when nessasary. No need to waist the bores! "One other thing I am going to do is tap the large water jacket holes on the deck,and install those plugs to stiffen up the deck." good plan there, I forgot to mention that...but for his stated purpose not critical. Actually you want to restrict some of the water passages and enlarge others to promote even cooling. I will have to look that up again to tell you wich ones to modify. And an aluminum radiator is always good insurance.
509 2-bolts are the mac daddy's, but as long as everything mag checks and you are careful in selecting parts and operating range I think its all good.





MotorHead, I hope mine turns out that good too! They are out there you just have to look. I found a few 509's for sale after buying my 511 and 817. As I posted above "509 2-bolts are the mac daddy's, but as long as everything mag checks and you are careful in selecting parts and operating range I think its all good."
Starting off with a good core is the key IMHO. Then taking the proper precautions should prevent or limit most problems. My point is that 400's can be tempermental and you should know the ins and outs are before building one.
Since I initially wanted a 383 stroker would a 400 shortblock get me similar performance? I have read that a 400 will provide really good torque at low rpms.
This will be going in a 77 with a THD 350 and 3:08 gears. I already have 186 heads w/ 64cc chambers. I was told these could be used with a gasket that blocks the steam holes.
Any opinions would be appreciated.
Check my site if you want to see what I did.
The only problem is you butt will clinch up as the $$$ is ripped out of it.
I am always on the hunt for a good 509. Have been looking for over one yr. VERY hard to find now-a-days. Had to buy an entire engine in one case...block questionable.
Bad core shift on another....
Damaged cylinder on another...
Bored to .060 on another....
ARGGGGGG....
Plenty of good 817's out there however.
Eddie














