When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Nobody "needs" aluminum heads. The advantages are: they weigh less, they allow you to run a bit more compression, and they are much easier to repair. But there are less expensive cast iron heads that make equivalent power.
My thoughts too. Unfortunately, aluminum seems to equate with "maximum performance" for many guys, and $$$ is wasted on them.
I'd never use an open plenum on the street...just my pref. It's got a 25-2800 stall convertor in it ... but still. No open plenums for me.
Well, you are giving away HP... It's one of the biggest myths that open plenum intakes will cost you streetability. Sure.. if you go with a Super Victor, you will lose streetability but with a I mild open plenum intake like the old torker intake it will not cost you anything. The TM-1 Torker intake on my old 383 outperformed the Performer RPM THROUGHOUT THE RPM BAND on the dyno.. I gained a total of 30 HP just by changing from vacuum secondaries carb to mechanical secondaries carb + from Performer RPM to Torker TM-1 intake. 335 vs. 365 RWHP... As I said, even at lower RPM, the ported TM-1 outperformed the Performer RPM..
Well, you are giving away HP... It's one of the biggest myths that open plenum intakes will cost you streetability. Sure.. if you go with a Super Victor, you will lose streetability but with a I mild open plenum intake like the old torker intake it will not cost you anything. The TM-1 Torker intake on my old 383 outperformed the Performer RPM THROUGHOUT THE RPM BAND on the dyno.. I gained a total of 30 HP just by changing from vacuum secondaries carb to mechanical secondaries carb + from Performer RPM to Torker TM-1 intake. 335 vs. 365 RWHP... As I said, even at lower RPM, the ported TM-1 outperformed the Performer RPM..
Be careful about recommending the earlier manifolds. The TM-1 was also a Tarantula manifold and was more suited to the strip than street.
If you buy an early Torker manifold make sure it SAYS "TORKER" somewhere on the top of the manifold. Here's a TORKER marking ...
Many manifolds are sold on E-bay as Torker manifolds and they are actually Tarantula manifolds. Olivier...if yours said TM-1 and didn't have TORKER in a rectangle, it was a Tarantula manifold.
Be careful about recommending the earlier manifolds. The TM-1 was also a Tarantula manifold and was more suited to the strip than street.
If you buy an early Torker manifold make sure it SAYS "TORKER" somewhere on the top of the manifold. Here's a TORKER marking ...
Many manifolds are sold on E-bay as Torker manifolds and they are actually Tarantula manifolds. Olivier...if yours said TM-1 and didn't have TORKER in a rectangle, it was a Tarantula manifold.
Dep
I had the Tarantula.. It looked identical to the Torker.. Don't really know what the difference is.. Like I said, my TM-1 Tarantula outperformed the Performer RPM thoughout the RPM range for HP and torque. I do have the dyno sheets..
I had the Tarantula.. It looked identical to the Torker.. Don't really know what the difference is.. Like I said, my TM-1 Tarantula outperformed the Performer RPM thoughout the RPM range for HP and torque. I do have the dyno sheets..
Oh I don't doubt for a second it did better than the Performer. It's actually made for high RPM applications...from 2500-7500 if I remember right. The Torker was made more for street use...1500-5500 RPM. Again...I'm depending on my often faulty memory for the RPM ranges
Oh I don't doubt for a second it did better than the Performer. It's actually made for high RPM applications...from 2500-7500 if I remember right. The Torker was made more for street use...1500-5500 RPM. Again...I'm depending on my often faulty memory for the RPM ranges
Dep
The TM-1 was 2500 - 6500 and the Torker was 1500 - 5500.. The TM-1 would've KILLED the regular Performer as it even beat the much better Performer RPM... I personally would never put a dual plane intake on any of my vehicles. I do have a Performer on the yellow '68 as it came like that and I'm not looking to make any more power on that car at this point. If I'd want more performance, the carb (Edelbrock q-jet) as also the intake would be the first items to go..
Some dual planes I like a lot. The factory dual plane high rise for the rectangular port big block works pretty good. Ditto for the Z-28/LT-1 aluminum high rise. The single planes work well if you are running a double pumper. The extra squirts of gas make up for the lack of vacuum at low RPMs.
Some dual planes I like a lot. The factory dual plane high rise for the rectangular port big block works pretty good. Ditto for the Z-28/LT-1 aluminum high rise. The single planes work well if you are running a double pumper. The extra squirts of gas make up for the lack of vacuum at low RPMs.
Dep
Well, I always run double pumpers on any performance engine anyways.. I also run mech. secondaries on the carb.. I don't like anything vacuum operated on the car as it adds another variable which I don't like. I don't know about big blocks and big block dual plane intakes as I've never had a vehicle with a big block..
We've got a Tarantula on a .060 over 327, small solid flat tappet and some iron SR Torquer heads. The little sucker is sweet..runs 12.70's on BFG street tires and will pull 7500 rpm if you want to. It drives pretty sweet with the old style intake. I ran it on a 350 with both stock heads and mega bad boy ported aluminum ones....loved it!
Thos early single planes were pretty small..even the Tarantula. When the Street and Strip Dominators came out from Holley,..things started getting pretty big.
Huh? On a Holley, how can you run one and not the other?
BigBlockk
Later.....
That you are running a double pumper doesn't mean that you have to run mech. secondaries...
You can run a double pumper with vacuum secondaries..
Re-read what I wrote (you even quoted it). If I would've said it the other way (that I'm running mech. secondaries but also run a double pumper), then your statement would be true as there are no single pumper mech. secondaries carb. However, the way I stated it, it is true. You can have a double pumper with vacuum secondaries so it doesn't automatically mean that a double pumper is also a mech. secondaries carb.
Hmm... I didn't know Holley made a vacuum secondary carburetor that had double accelerator pumps.
As a matter of fact I didn't think the extra accelerator pump was needed on a vacuum secondary carburetor.
Oh well.
BigBlockk
Later.....
All the Street Avenger carbs are double pumper carbs and the secondary pump is operated by vacuum...
There are also vacuum secondaries 4150 series (double pumper) carbs.
The 4160 series are all single pumpers with vacuum secondaries. The 4150 series are all double pumpers, available with vacuum or mech. secondaries operated secondary pump..
IMHO, a vaccum secondaries carb has no business being on a performance engine.. I initially ran a "built" vacuum secondaries carb (with proform main body) on my old 383 but the secondaries would never open up completely with the vacuum, so I went with the HP series mech. secondaries carb.. What a difference!!
Hmm... I didn't know Holley made a vacuum secondary carburetor that had double accelerator pumps.
As a matter of fact I didn't think the extra accelerator pump was needed on a vacuum secondary carburetor.
Oh well.
BigBlockk
Later.....
Big: They DON'T!!!! Olivier is a bit confused. The first two carbs he linked to do NOT have double accelerator pumps. They have DUAL FEED! That means they get gas to both floats. Dual feed does not mean "double pumper". There is only one pump on vacuum secondary carbs. There is a kit that will add a second set of squirters for the secondaries on a single pump carb if you've done the old "sheet metal screw through the vacuum linkage" trick.. But it is using the single pump to squirt to all four holes.
Again...dual inlet/dual feed does not mean two accelerator pumps
A second accelerator pump on a vacuum secondary carb would be worthless. It would be squirting gas into closed throttle plates!!!
My dyno guy found 75 rwhp in my combo. I now have 280 rwhp/315 rwtq. I still have stk smog rams horns. They are costing me big hp/tq till I get headers. 300 rwhp has a nice ring to it.
Big: They DON'T!!!! Olivier is a bit confused. The first two carbs he linked to do NOT have double accelerator pumps. They have DUAL FEED! That means they get gas to both floats. Dual feed does not mean "double pumper". There is only one pump on vacuum secondary carbs. There is a kit that will add a second set of squirters for the secondaries on a single pump carb if you've done the old "sheet metal screw through the vacuum linkage" trick.. But it is using the single pump to squirt to all four holes.
Again...dual inlet/dual feed does not mean two accelerator pumps
A second accelerator pump on a vacuum secondary carb would be worthless. It would be squirting gas into closed throttle plates!!!
From: San Diego - Deep Within The State of CONFUSION!
Originally Posted by Taijutsu
My dyno guy found 75 rwhp in my combo. I now have 280 rwhp/315 rwtq. I still have stk smog rams horns. They are costing me big hp/tq till I get headers. 300 rwhp has a nice ring to it.
Ricisan
your engine's running a bit better than mine, with Ram Horn manifolds? WOW that's good.
On the other hand the Ram Horns are good manifolds. They're as good as cast iron manifolds get and arguably as good as cheap headers.
I'm enjoying the discussion on this subject. as always I'm learning from those who have been there/done that. I understand that dual plane intakes are good for low and mid range rpm's, and single for high rpm's.
I have heard that if you remove some material from the dividing plenum, you can even the playing field and have the best of both worlds. is this one of those urban legends, or is it fact ? if true, how do you remove the metal ? is it notched or evenly removed across the whole divider ? how much material is removed ? thanks, Rich
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.