When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's not on the road yet, we only recently fired it up on the bare chassis and it has some very nice crackle and snap to it. The L-82 cam with it's longer duration is more suited for the longer stroke of the 350 while the "151" has a few degrees less duration for the shorter stroke 327. I also advanced it 4 degrees for some more bottom end.
It's not on the road yet, we only recently fired it up on the bare chassis and it has some very nice crackle and snap to it. The L-82 cam with it's longer duration is more suited for the longer stroke of the 350 while the "151" has a few degrees less duration for the shorter stroke 327. I also advanced it 4 degrees for some more bottom end.
That helps a lot. I'm really partial to trying to use the components of the day.
Personally I would just use the L-82 cam and install it 2 degrees advanced. My 041's have all the holes drilled for accessories so I would think there is plenty of material there on yours.
Why? The stock cam will wimp out on you. Spend another 100 bucks and get some decent lift to take advantage of the heads. Airflow doesnt matter if your valves will not lift enough to take advantage of it.
Why, because it is dead on reliable with no wear issues associated with the higher, faster ramp rates of some of these aftermarket pieces and can make 350 HP+ at the crank. Agreed you could make a few more ponies with something else but at a cost.
IMHO, 224*/224*, vl .450”/.460”, icl 114*, ecl 114*, LSA 114 are not bad numbers for a basic warmed over 350. Another .020"-.030" of lift doesn't buy you a whole lot more for a street car.
Why, because it is dead on reliable with no wear issues associated with the higher, faster ramp rates of some of these aftermarket pieces and can make 350 HP+ at the crank. Agreed you could make a few more ponies with something else but at a cost.
IMHO, 224*/224*, vl .450”/.460”, icl 114*, ecl 114*, LSA 114 are not bad numbers for a basic warmed over 350. Another .020"-.030" of lift doesn't buy you a whole lot more for a street car.
I tend to agree. I'm not looking for absolute max performance, and I would gladly trade a bit of performance for some reliability. GM had to warranty the motors these cams came in, so they must have tried to strike some balance between performance and durability.
It would seem that if I was unhappy, I could always use 1.6 rockers, that would give me .480/.491 valve lift.
I'vr heard bad stories about people not breaking in the high ramp cams and then wiping a lobe at 2000 miles or something. I don't want that kind of trouble.
Just a note, I think that 262 comp has an ICL of 106 degrees which wouold make it 8 degrees advanced from the L-82 cam and that is why it builds a bunch of low end torque.