C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #1  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default New Camshaft

Hello. Had the engine in my 1980 L-82 Vette rebuilt: bored 30 over, heads milled, new valves (1.94 intake/1.50 exhaust), everything else is stock (q-jet, auto tranny, 3.07 rear.) The shop that rebuilt it put in a "mild cam" with these numbers: 214-224 443-465. Has anyone else used this cam set up? Is it appropriate for this car? What did I have originally? I'm getting a lot of detonation under load, and have to turn the timing back to 8* (from 12*) just to minimize it. Could this cam be the problem? A novice to these things, but I'm learning! Thanks for any help. JG700
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #2  
Glensgages's Avatar
Glensgages
Race Director
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 90
From: State of Confusion
Default

Originally Posted by jtg700
The shop that rebuilt it put in a "mild cam" with these numbers: 214-224 443-465. Has anyone else used this cam set up? Is it appropriate for this car? What did I have originally?
I'll 'assume' (and I hate using that word..... ) those numbers refer to duration @ .050" valve-lift (214* intake and 224* exhaust ), while the 2nd set of numbers are the amount of valve-lift with the stock rocker arms (.443" intake, and .465" exhaust ):
I am not-sure of the specs for an '80 L-82 cam, but it isn't much bigger or longer (if-ANY ) than this cam, I wouldn't imagine.....


I don't think that cam would cause pre-detonation by-itself..... when the motor was over-bored, what pistons did the shop use (flat-tops, pop-ups, dished? ), and/or how-much did they whack-off of the cylinder-heads?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #3  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

Flat top pistons with 4 "eyebrows." Heads milled .010. Does this help?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #4  
my mach 5's Avatar
my mach 5
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: South Elgin IL
Default

These are the specs for the L-82 cam:

Intake duration @ .050- 222
Exhaust Duration @ .050- 222
Intake Lift- .450"
Exhaust Lift- .450"
Lobe Centerline- 114
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #5  
big_G's Avatar
big_G
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 5
From: Austin Texas
Default

You have an L-82 with 1.94/1.50 valves? The correct valve size for an L-82 is 2.02/1.60. Sumthin's wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

Would this cause my detonation problem?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
my mach 5's Avatar
my mach 5
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: South Elgin IL
Default

I am not sure why it would. This engine uses the same cam and has the same valves as what you have:

http://paceperformance.com/index.asp...D&ProdID=84482
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #8  
Scott Marzahl's Avatar
Scott Marzahl
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,363
Likes: 429
From: Seattle Area WA
Default

Did you try disconnecting and plug the vacum advance to the distributor yet and see how it runs? This still sounds like timing/distributor issue to me.

What is the intake center line on that cam, (point of max lift on the intake, 106 or 107 degrees? Also, what does it tell you the exhaust closing at .004" is? Next question, did the shop install it straight up or even bother to degree it when installed.

Good comment on the valve sizes too, did they swap out your heads or were they changed at one time, basically what chamber size do you have?

Last edited by Scott Marzahl; Jul 15, 2007 at 06:25 PM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 First Look: Everything You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

5 Best & 5 Worst Corvette Daily Drivers

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

The Headlights of Every Corvette Generation Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-8

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 07:25 PM
  #9  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

Disconnected and plugged vacuum. It ran better (fewer knocks) but not completely eliminated under load. I even tried it after turning the distributor back to 8*, but still had detonation under load. I'll check on the other stuff you asked. Thanks for the help everyone!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #10  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

Cam centerline is 112* (107/117). Does this help?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:21 PM
  #11  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

You have increased compression and reduced the cam duration. You need 100 octane to run it without detonation or change the cam as the L82 was originally designed to run premium. The L82 cam also had a late intake valve closing to help prevent detonation. I would change the cam to something with around 224 int duration and 230 exhaust duration, Dial your timing in good and run premium fuel. You will destroy your motor if you don't resolve the detonation problem.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #12  
MYBAD79's Avatar
MYBAD79
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 54
From: Orlando Florida
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

First off, make sure the balancer hasn't slipped. Should be new after a rebuild but you never know...

The cam is mild, about what I'd pick for a stock rebuild... not too crazy, should have really good manners on the road...

Check your timing and vacuum advance again, the engine should run fine anywhere between 4 and 12 degrees advanced at idle (vacuum hose plugged).... you should see around 30-36 degrees total timing at 2500-3000rpm.

Check one more time if the plug wires are connected correctly.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #13  
MYBAD79's Avatar
MYBAD79
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 54
From: Orlando Florida
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

Originally Posted by 63mako
You have increased compression and reduced the cam duration. You need 100 octane to run it without detonation or change the cam as the L82 was originally designed to run premium. The L82 cam also had a late intake valve closing to help prevent detonation. I would change the cam to something with around 224 int duration and 230 exhaust duration, Dial your timing in good and run premium fuel. You will destroy your motor if you don't resolve the detonation problem.
I used to run flat tops (didn't even know, the p.o. installed them), 64cc aluminum heads with a edelbrock Performer cam (204-214)..... no detonation problems with 93octane fuel but low end power like a truck...LOL

Yes, with low grade fuel you'll have detonation, especially with iron heads....
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #14  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

I like the XE268H From Comp cams for your application. It has 224 int and 230 ex duration. Intake lift is .477 and exhaust lift is .480. It comes with a 110 LSA. A 112 LSA would be a better match for you. a custom grind cost a couple bucks extra and adds 2 days to your delivery time but will give you a better idle and a little better power under the curve with your high gear rear end. Your motor would love a 3.55 gear in the back. That is a lot of the reason for the detonation. Your lugging the motor a little with the 3.07 rear. You probably wouldn't have an issue with aluminum heads with your combination but between the small duration cam, high rear gear, iron heads and the compression bumped up they all combine to cause your detonation problem.

Last edited by 63mako; Jul 15, 2007 at 10:00 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #15  
Glensgages's Avatar
Glensgages
Race Director
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,177
Likes: 90
From: State of Confusion
Default

Originally Posted by MYBAD79
I used to run flat tops (didn't even know, the p.o. installed them), 64cc aluminum heads with a edelbrock Performer cam (204-214)..... no detonation problems with 93octane fuel but low end power like a truck...LOL

Yes, with low grade fuel you'll have detonation, especially with iron heads....
I did about the same to the LM-1 in my '79 Z28 a few years after it was new, adding 64cc iron heads, and a cam with 218* @ .050" with a 114* LSA, and never had pinging on good-grade of gas (higher-octane SUNOCO or GULF )
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2007 | 10:29 PM
  #16  
Scott Marzahl's Avatar
Scott Marzahl
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,363
Likes: 429
From: Seattle Area WA
Default

As already stated by 63mako, you do not have a matched build. That is an early closing inlet cam with 7 degrees of advance ground into it over what your stock cam had. IMHO, these types of cams are made for 8:1motors. Not knowing what the rest of your build is, that cam is suspect for causing too much dynamic compression. Myself, I would yank it out and install a new L-82 replacement from Crane or Sealed Power. With it's late closing inlet valve, it should resolve your detonation problems with any pump gas.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #17  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

72 cc heads, if that is important.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To New Camshaft

Old Jul 16, 2007 | 05:20 PM
  #18  
LeMans Pete's Avatar
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 41
From: Raleigh NC
St. Jude Donor '13-'14
Default

Originally Posted by jtg700
72 cc heads, if that is important.
I'm sorry I'm suspect of a shop that increases the SCR then puts in a milder cam. Why would you put in a milder cam than the original with a rebuild?

If they can't even properly match a cam, I'd be affraid of what else they did.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #19  
jtg700's Avatar
jtg700
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Rochester New York
Default

Why is it milder? I don't really understand the numbers.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #20  
Scott Marzahl's Avatar
Scott Marzahl
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,363
Likes: 429
From: Seattle Area WA
Default

It has a bit lower lift and a shorter intake duaration. This cam has 214 degrees of intake and 224 degrees of duration while the L-82 cam has 224 degrees of intake and 224 exhaust so it is not terrible different in those regards but it is ground advanced as indicated by the Intake Center line points, 107 for this cam and 114 for the L-82 cam. For reference, your new cam's intake valve closes at 63 degrees ABDC as opposed to the L-82 cam's closing point of 79 degrees ABDC, it closes 16 degrees sooner creating more compression.

With 72 cc heads and flat tops it is pretty hard to believe that you have too much compression. I ran a quick SCR/DCR calculation using www.empirenet.com , assuming you did not mill the block with a standard deck height of .025", and you have true 72 cc heads, flat tops with a piston volume of -7 CCs for the eyebrows, and you used a standard thickness head gasket of .039", you are just shy of 9:1 static compression (SCR) which is about the same as your original L-82. The resultant DCR from this program shows you at 7.2:1 so in theory you should be OK compression wise ASSUMING that nothing is way out of bed here.

Did anyone bother to degree that cam when they installed it. Many an aftermarket cam requires some adjustment during install. Did the the cam get installed straight up or advanced a few degrees which would be hurting you.

You are going to have to investigate the timing and the distributor and possibly back off your timing more.

You need to pull a plug and see if it is the correct tan color, if not address any carb issues such as possibly installing bigger main jets.

You need to mark off your balancer either with a degree tape or measure it out. Hookup a timing light with the vacum advance hooked up, and see how much total advance you are running.

If you haven't read Barry's sticky on timing and carb set up, please do so, it explains this in detail.

Last edited by Scott Marzahl; Jul 16, 2007 at 06:36 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.

story-0
2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 First Look: Everything You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Is the 2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 the best Silverado yet?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-16 08:01:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
5 Best & 5 Worst Corvette Daily Drivers

Slideshow: 5 best and 5 worst Corvette daily drivers

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 10:32:13


VIEW MORE
story-2
The Headlights of Every Corvette Generation Explained

Slideshow: The headlights of every Corvette generation explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 10:17:14


VIEW MORE
story-3
5 Best & 5 Most Overrated Corvette Track Packages of All Time!

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 most overrated Corvette track packages ever.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:46:45


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2027 Corvette Engine Explained

Slideshow: Every 2027 Corvette engine explained

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 12:16:31


VIEW MORE
story-5
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette

Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-08 19:53:43


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE